Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 8/2022

Open Access 31-01-2022

Time to deterioration of patient-reported outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: exploring different definitions

Auteurs: Andrew Walding, Konstantina Skaltsa, Montserrat Casamayor, Anna Rydén

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical relevance of different time-to-deterioration (TTD) definitions for patient-reported outcomes were explored.

Methods

TTD definitions differing by reference score and deterioration event were used to analyse data from the phase 3 FLAURA trial of first-line osimertinib versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Pre-specified key symptoms were fatigue, appetite loss, cough, chest pain and dyspnoea, scored using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires (≥ 10-point difference = clinically relevant).

Results

No significant treatment differences in TTD (distributions) were observed using definitions based on transient or definitive deterioration alone. TTD definitions based on definitive, sustained deterioration, with death not included as an event, yielded a significant treatment difference for dyspnoea (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; P = 0.034) when baseline was the reference, and for cough (HR 0.70; P = 0.009) and dyspnoea (HR 0.71; P = 0.004) when best previous score was the reference. With death included as an event, treatment differences were significant for dyspnoea (HR 0.70; P = 0.025) when baseline was the reference, and for cough (HR 0.70; P = 0.011), dyspnoea (HR 0.71; P = 0.003) and chest pain (HR 0.71; P = 0.038) when best previous score was the reference. Irrespective of definition, TTD for appetite loss and fatigue did not differ significantly between arms.

Conclusion

This exploratory work showed that different TTD definitions yield different magnitudes of treatment difference, highlighting the importance of pre-specifying TTD definitions upfront in clinical trials.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02296125.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Anota, A., Hamidou, Z., Paget-Bailly, S., Chibaudel, B., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Auquier, P., Westeel, V., Fiteni, F., Borg, C., & Bonnetain, F. (2015). Time to health-related quality of life score deterioration as a modality of longitudinal analysis for health-related quality of life studies in oncology: Do we need RECIST for quality of life to achieve standardization? Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0583-6CrossRefPubMed Anota, A., Hamidou, Z., Paget-Bailly, S., Chibaudel, B., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., Auquier, P., Westeel, V., Fiteni, F., Borg, C., & Bonnetain, F. (2015). Time to health-related quality of life score deterioration as a modality of longitudinal analysis for health-related quality of life studies in oncology: Do we need RECIST for quality of life to achieve standardization? Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 5–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-013-0583-6CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Charton, E., Cuer, B., Cottone, F., Efficace, F., Touraine, C., Hamidou, Z., Fiteni, F., Bonnetain, F., Woronoff-Lemsi, M. C., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., & Anota, A. (2020). Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 29(4), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02367-7CrossRefPubMed Charton, E., Cuer, B., Cottone, F., Efficace, F., Touraine, C., Hamidou, Z., Fiteni, F., Bonnetain, F., Woronoff-Lemsi, M. C., Bascoul-Mollevi, C., & Anota, A. (2020). Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 29(4), 867–878. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-019-02367-7CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Coens, C., Pe, M., Dueck, A. C., Sloan, J., Basch, E., Calvert, M., Campbell, A., Cleeland, C., Cocks, K., Collette, L., Devlin, N., Dorme, L., Flechtner, H. H., Gotay, C., Griebsch, I., Groenvold, M., King, M., Kluetz, P. G., Koller, M., … Bottomley, A. (2020). International standards for the analysis of quality-of-life and patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials: recommendations of the SISAQOL Consortium. Lancet Oncology, 21(2), e83–e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30790-9CrossRefPubMed Coens, C., Pe, M., Dueck, A. C., Sloan, J., Basch, E., Calvert, M., Campbell, A., Cleeland, C., Cocks, K., Collette, L., Devlin, N., Dorme, L., Flechtner, H. H., Gotay, C., Griebsch, I., Groenvold, M., King, M., Kluetz, P. G., Koller, M., … Bottomley, A. (2020). International standards for the analysis of quality-of-life and patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials: recommendations of the SISAQOL Consortium. Lancet Oncology, 21(2), e83–e96. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s1470-2045(19)30790-9CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Soria, J. C., Ohe, Y., Vansteenkiste, J., Reungwetwattana, T., Chewaskulyong, B., Lee, K. H., Dechaphunkul, A., Imamura, F., Nogami, N., Kurata, T., Okamoto, I., Zhou, C., Cho, B. C., Cheng, Y., Cho, E. K., Voon, P. J., Planchard, D., Su, W. C., Gray, J. E., Lee, S.-M., Hodge, R., Marotti, M., Rukazenkov, Y., Ramalingam, S. S. for the FLAURA Investigators (2018). Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713137CrossRefPubMed Soria, J. C., Ohe, Y., Vansteenkiste, J., Reungwetwattana, T., Chewaskulyong, B., Lee, K. H., Dechaphunkul, A., Imamura, F., Nogami, N., Kurata, T., Okamoto, I., Zhou, C., Cho, B. C., Cheng, Y., Cho, E. K., Voon, P. J., Planchard, D., Su, W. C., Gray, J. E., Lee, S.-M., Hodge, R., Marotti, M., Rukazenkov, Y., Ramalingam, S. S. for the FLAURA Investigators (2018). Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(2), 113–125. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1713137CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Kaasa, S., Klee, M., Osoba, D., Razavi, D., Rofe, P. B., Schraub, S., Sneeuw, K., Sullivan, M., & Takeda, F. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Kaasa, S., Klee, M., Osoba, D., Razavi, D., Rofe, P. B., Schraub, S., Sneeuw, K., Sullivan, M., & Takeda, F. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bergman, B., Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Kaasa, S., & Sullivan, M. (1994). The EORTC QLQ-LC13: A modular supplement to the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC study group on quality of life. European Journal of Cancer, 30A(5), 635–642.CrossRef Bergman, B., Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Kaasa, S., & Sullivan, M. (1994). The EORTC QLQ-LC13: A modular supplement to the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC study group on quality of life. European Journal of Cancer, 30A(5), 635–642.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Efron, B. (1977). The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 72(359), 557–565.CrossRef Efron, B. (1977). The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 72(359), 557–565.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rufibach, K. (2019). Treatment effect quantification for time-to-event endpoints-estimands, analysis strategies, and beyond. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 18(2), 145–165.CrossRef Rufibach, K. (2019). Treatment effect quantification for time-to-event endpoints-estimands, analysis strategies, and beyond. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 18(2), 145–165.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., de Castro, G., Martyn St-James, M., Fayers, P. M., & Brown, J. M. (2012). Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. European Journal of Cancer, 48(11), 1713–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059CrossRefPubMed Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., de Castro, G., Martyn St-James, M., Fayers, P. M., & Brown, J. M. (2012). Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. European Journal of Cancer, 48(11), 1713–1721. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2012.​02.​059CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., Martyn St-James, M., Fayers, P. M., & Brown, J. M. (2011). Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.28.0107CrossRefPubMed Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., Martyn St-James, M., Fayers, P. M., & Brown, J. M. (2011). Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(1), 89–96. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2010.​28.​0107CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Musoro, Z. J., Hamel, J. F., Ediebah, D. E., Cocks, K., King, M. T., Groenvold, M., Sprangers, M. A. G., Brandberg, Y., Velikova, G., Maringwa, J., Flechtner, H. H., Bottomley, A., & Coens, C. (2018). Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), e019117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019117CrossRef Musoro, Z. J., Hamel, J. F., Ediebah, D. E., Cocks, K., King, M. T., Groenvold, M., Sprangers, M. A. G., Brandberg, Y., Velikova, G., Maringwa, J., Flechtner, H. H., Bottomley, A., & Coens, C. (2018). Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences (MID) with the EORTC quality-of-life measures: a meta-analysis protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 8(1), e019117. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2017-019117CrossRef
21.
Metagegevens
Titel
Time to deterioration of patient-reported outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: exploring different definitions
Auteurs
Andrew Walding
Konstantina Skaltsa
Montserrat Casamayor
Anna Rydén
Publicatiedatum
31-01-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03088-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2022

Quality of Life Research 8/2022 Naar de uitgave