Top

Quality of Life Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

21-05-2018 | Brief Communication

The modified Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form: a modified response format and rational scoring rules

Auteurs: J. L. Sharp, K. Gough, M. C. Pascoe, A. Drosdowsky, V. T. Chang, P. Schofield

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2018

Abstract

Purpose

The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) is a widely used symptom assessment instrument. Patients who self-complete the MSAS-SF have difficulty following the two-part response format, resulting in incorrectly completed responses. We describe modifications to the response format to improve useability, and rational scoring rules for incorrectly completed items.

Methods

The modified MSAS-SF was completed by 311 women in our Peer and Nurse support Trial to Assist women in Gynaecological Oncology; the PeNTAGOn study. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise completion of the modified MSAS-SF, and provide symptom statistics before and after applying the rational scoring rules. Spearman’s correlations with the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were assessed.

Results

Correct completion of the modified MSAS-SF items ranged from 91.5 to 98.7%. The rational scoring rules increased the percentage of useable responses on average 4% across all symptoms. MSAS-SF item statistics were similar with and without the scoring rules. The pattern of correlations with FACT-G and HADS was compatible with prior research.

Conclusion

The modified MSAS-SF was useable for self-completion and responses demonstrated validity. The rational scoring rules can minimise loss of data from incorrectly completed responses. Further investigation is recommended.

vorige artikel The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL)

volgende artikel Validation of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks in Dutch adolescents

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Portenoy, R. K., Thaler, H. T., Kornblith, A. B., Lepore, J. M., Friedlander-Klar, H., Kiyasu, E., et al. (1994). The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: An instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. European Journal of Cancer, 30A(9), 1326–1336. CrossRefPubMed

Chang, V. T., Hwang, S. S., Feuerman, M., Kasimis, B. S., & Thaler, H. T. (2000). The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF). Cancer, 89(5), 1162–1171. CrossRefPubMed

Kirkova, J., Davis, M. P., Walsh, D., Tiernan, E., O’Leary, N., LeGrand, S. B., et al. (2006). Cancer symptom assessment instruments: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(9), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8332. CrossRefPubMed

Schofield, P., Juraskova, I., Bergin, R., Gough, K., Mileshkin, L., Krishnaswamy, M., et al. (2013). A nurse- and peer-led support program to assist women in gynaecological oncology receiving curative radiotherapy, the PeNTAGOn study (peer and nurse support trial to assist women in gynaecological oncology): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-39. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lam, W. W., Law, C. C., Fu, Y. T., Wong, K. H., Chang, V. T., & Fielding, R. (2008). New insights in symptom assessment: The Chinese Versions of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) and the Condensed MSAS (CMSAS). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(6), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.008. CrossRefPubMed

Webber, K., & Davies, A. N. (2011). Validity of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form psychological subscales in advanced cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(5), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.007. CrossRefPubMed

Dapueto, J. J., Abreu Mdel, C., Francolino, C., & Levin, R. (2014). Psychometric assessment of the MSAS-SF and the FACIT-Fatigue Scale in Spanish-speaking patients with cancer in Uruguay. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(5), 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.020. CrossRefPubMed

Hwang, S. S., Chang, V. T., Fairclough, D. L., Cogswell, J., & Kasimis, B. (2003). Longitudinal quality of life in advanced cancer patients: Pilot study results from a VA medical cancer center. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(3), 225–235. CrossRefPubMed

Dong, Y., & Peng, C. Y. (2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-222. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570. CrossRefPubMed

12.

Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741. CrossRef

13.

Spinhoven, P., Ormel, J., Sloekers, P. P., Kempen, G. I., Speckens, A. E., & Van Hemert, A. M. (1997). A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychological Medicine, 27(2), 363–370. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Rodgers, J., Martin, C. R., Morse, R. C., Kendell, K., & Verrill, M. (2005). An investigation into the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with breast cancer. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-41. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Espie, C. A., Fleming, L., Cassidy, J., Samuel, L., Taylor, L. M., White, C. A., et al. (2008). Randomized controlled clinical effectiveness trial of cognitive behavior therapy compared with treatment as usual for persistent insomnia in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(28), 4651–4658. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9006. CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kornblith, A. B., Dowell, J. M., Herndon, J. E. 2nd, Engelman, B. J., Bauer-Wu, S., Small, E. J., et al. (2006). Telephone monitoring of distress in patients aged 65 years or older with advanced stage cancer: A cancer and leukemia group B study. Cancer, 107(11), 2706–2714. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22296. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Winstead-Fry, P., & Schultz, A. (1997). Psychometric analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale in a rural sample. Cancer, 79(12), 2446–2452. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Smith, A. B., Wright, P., Selby, P. J., & Velikova, G. (2007). A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-19. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Cella, D., Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Peterman, A. H., & Merkel, D. E. (2002). Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24(6), 547–561. CrossRefPubMed

20.

Nho, J. H., Kim, S. R., Chang, V. T., & Nam, J. H. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Korean Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form in gynecological cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.023. PubMedCrossRef

21.

Fayers, P. M., Curran, D., & Machin, D. (1998). Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials: Missing items. Statistics in Medicine, 17(5–7), 679–696. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9549816.

22.

Bell, M. L., Butow, P. N., & Goldstein, D. (2013). Informatively missing quality of life and unmet needs sex data for immigrant and Anglo-Australian cancer patients and survivors. Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2757–2760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0392-y. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The modified Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form: a modified response format and rational scoring rules
Auteurs: J. L. Sharp
K. Gough
M. C. Pascoe
A. Drosdowsky
V. T. Chang
P. Schofield
Publicatiedatum: 21-05-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1855-y

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

The modified Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form: a modified response format and rational scoring rules

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2018

Measurement invariance, the lack thereof, and modeling change

Health state utility values of high prevalence mental disorders in Australia: results from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing

The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction

A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration

Preference-based measures to obtain health state utility values for use in economic evaluations with child-based populations: a review and UK-based focus group assessment of patient and parent choices

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D-CHN): a school-based study in China