Top

Quality of Life Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

05-05-2018

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D-CHN): a school-based study in China

Auteurs: Peirong Yang, Gang Chen, Peng Wang, Kejian Zhang, Feng Deng, Haifeng Yang, Guihua Zhuang

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2018

Abstract

Purpose

The Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D), a new generic preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, was developed specifically for the application in cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments and interventions for children and adolescents. The main objective of this study was to examine the psychometric property of the Chinese version of CHU9D (CHU9D-CHN) in a large school-based sample in China.

Methods

Data were collected using a multi-stage sampling method from third-to-ninth-grade students in Shaanxi Province, China. Participants self-completed a hard-copy questionnaire including the CHU9D-CHN instrument, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), information on socio-demographic characteristics and self-reported health status. The psychometric properties of the CHU9D-CHN, including the internal consistency, 2-week test–retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity were studied.

Results

A total of 1912 students participated in the survey. The CHU9D-CHN internal consistency and test–retest reliability were good to excellent with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.77 and an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.65, respectively. The CHU9D utility scores moderately correlated with the PedsQL total scores (r = .57, P < .001), demonstrating good convergent validity. Difference of the CHU9D utility scores among the different participants with levels of self-reported general health, health services utilisation and left-behind status demonstrated good construct validity.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrated adequate psychometric performance for the CHU9D-CHN. The CHU9D-CHN was a satisfactory, reliable and valid instrument to measure and value HRQoL for children and adolescents in China.

vorige artikel Validation of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks in Dutch adolescents

volgende artikel Activity pacing: moving beyond taking breaks and slowing down

Williams, P. G., Holmbeck, G. N., & Greenley, R. N. (2002). Adolescent health psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 828–842. CrossRefPubMed

Sawyer, S. M., Afifi, R. A., Bearinger, L. H., Blakemore, S. J., Dick, B., Ezeh, A. C., & Patton, G. C. (2012). Adolescence: A foundation for future health. Lancet, 379, 1630–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60072-5. CrossRefPubMed

Kleinert, S. (2007). Adolescent health: An opportunity not to be missed. Lancet, 369, 1057–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60374-2. CrossRefPubMed

Morris, J., Perez, D., & McNoe, B. (1998). The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 7, 85–91. CrossRefPubMed

Lehnert, T., Sonntag, D., Konnopka, A., Riedel-Heller, S., & Konig, H. H. (2012). The long-term cost-effectiveness of obesity prevention interventions: Systematic literature review. Obesity Reviews, 13, 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00980.x. CrossRefPubMed

Chen, G., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015). A review of the development and application of generic multi-attribute utility instruments for paediatric populations. Pharmacoeconomics, 33, 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0286-7. CrossRefPubMed

Stevens, K. J. (2010). Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference-based, generic, pediatric, health-related quality-of-life measure. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309358328. CrossRefPubMed

Stevens, K. (2009). Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9524-9. CrossRefPubMed

Ratcliffe, J., Flynn, T., Terlich, F., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., & Sawyer, M. (2012). Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: An application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Pharmacoeconomics, 30, 713–727. https://doi.org/10.2165/11597900-000000000-00000. CrossRefPubMed

10.

Stevens, K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2012). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: An assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. Value Health, 15, 1092–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.07.011. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Chen, G., Flynn, T., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., Huynh, E., Sawyer, M., Roberts, R., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015). Assessing the health-related quality of life of Australian adolescents: An empirical comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y instruments. Value Health, 18, 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.014. CrossRefPubMed

12.

Blake, H., Quirk, H., Leighton, P., Randell, T., Greening, J., Guo, B., et al. (2016). Feasibility of an online intervention (STAK-D) to promote physical activity in children with type 1 diabetes: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 17(1), 583. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1719-0. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

13.

Furber, G., & Segal, L. (2015). The validity of the Child Health Utility instrument (CHU9D) as a routine outcome measure for use in child and adolescent mental health services. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0218-4. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

14.

Frew, E. J., Pallan, M., Lancashire, E., Hemming, K., & Adab, P. (2015). Is utility-based quality of life associated with overweight in children? Evidence from the UK WAVES randomised controlled study. BMC Pediatrics, 15(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0526-1. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

15.

Xu, F., Chen, G., Stevens, K., Zhou, H., Qi, S., Wang, Z., Hong, X., Chen, X., Yang, H., Wang, C., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014). Measuring and valuing health-related quality of life among children and adolescents in mainland China—A pilot study. PLoS ONE, 9, e89222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089222. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

16.

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ratcliffe, J., Huynh, E., Chen, G., Stevens, K., Swait, J., Brazier, J., Sawyer, M., Roberts, R., & Flynn, T. (2016). Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm. Social Science and Medicine, 157, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.042. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Chen, G., Xu, F., Huynh, E., Wang, Z., Li, C., Stevens, K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2016). Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Estimation of a Chinese adolescent-specific tariff. Quality of Life Research, 25(S1), 23–24.

19.

Chen, G., Huynh, E., Xu, F., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., Swait, J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2017). OP55 Health technology assessment in children and adolescents: Adolescent preferences for Child Health Utility 9D health states. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 33(S1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646231700143x. CrossRef

20.

Chen, G., Xu, F., Huynh, E., Wang, Z., Li, C., Stevens, K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2018). Developing a Chinese-specific adolescent tariff for the Child Health Utility 9D instrument. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics Research Paper 96, Monash University.

21.

Hao, Y., Tian, Q., Lu, Y., Chai, Y., & Rao, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 generic core scales. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1229–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9672-y. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Huang, Y., Zhong, X. N., Li, Q. Y., Xu, D., Zhang, X. L., Feng, C., Yang, G. X., Bo, Y. Y., & Deng, B. (2015). Health-related quality of life of the rural-China left-behind children or adolescents and influential factors: A cross-sectional study. Health and Quality Life Outcomes, 13, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0220-x. CrossRef

23.

Wu, H. H., Li, H., & Gao, Q. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 generic core scales among children with short stature. Health and Quality Life Outcomes, 11, 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-87. CrossRef

24.

Hofsteenge, G. H., Weijs, P. J., Delemarre-van de Waal, H. A., de Wit, M., & Chinapaw, M. J. (2013). Effect of the Go4it multidisciplinary group treatment for obese adolescents on health related quality of life: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 13, 939. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-939. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

25.

Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Kurtin, P. S. (2001). PedsQL™ 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care, 39, 800–812. CrossRefPubMed

26.

Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309. CrossRef

27.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage. Publications Ltd.

28.

Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed). Chichester: Wiley. CrossRef

29.

Wang, H. M., Patrick, D. L., Edwards, T. C., Skalicky, A. M., Zeng, H. Y., & Gu, W. W. (2012). Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9915-6. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Conner-Spady, B. L., Marshall, D. A., Bohm, E., Dunbar, M. J., Loucks, L., Khudairy, A. A., et al. (2015). Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Quality of Life Research, 24(7), 1775–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0910-6. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Cheung, P. W. H., Wong, C. K. H., Samartzis, D., Luk, K. D. K., Lam, C. L. K., Cheung, K. M. C., et al. (2016). Psychometric validation of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) in Chinese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disorders, 11, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0083-x. CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

32.

Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220. CrossRefPubMed

33.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. CrossRefPubMed

34.

Anderson, T. W., & Finn, J. (1996). The new statistical analysis of data. New York: Springer. CrossRef

35.

Fan, F., Su, L. Y., Gill, M. K., & Birmaher, B. (2010). Emotional and behavioral problems of Chinese left-behind children: A preliminary study. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(6), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0107-4. CrossRefPubMed

36.

Ding, G., & Bao, Y. (2014). Editorial perspective: Assessing developmental risk in cultural context: The case of ‘left behind’ children in rural China. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(4), 411–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12228. CrossRefPubMed

37.

Man, Y., Mengmeng, L., Lezhi, L., Ting, M., & Jingping, Z. (2017). The psychological problems and related influential factors of left-behind adolescents (LBA) in Hunan, China: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Equity in Health, 16(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0639-2. CrossRef

38.

Qu, G. B., Wu, W., Wang, L. L., Tang, X., Sun, Y. H., Li, J., et al. (2017). Systematic review and meta-analysis found higher levels of behavioural problems in male left-behind children aged 6–11 years. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14199. CrossRef

39.

Xing, H., Yu, W., Xu, F., & Chen, S. (2017). Influence of social support and rearing behavior on psychosocial health in left-behind children. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 15(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0592-1. CrossRef

40.

Furber, G., & Segal, L. (2015). The validity of the Child Health Utility instrument (CHU9D) as a routine outcome measure for use in child and adolescent mental health services. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 13, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0218-4. CrossRef

41.

Canaway, A. G., & Frew, E. J. (2013). Measuring preference-based quality of life in children aged 6–7 years: A comparison of the performance of the CHU-9D and EQ-5D-Y—the WAVES pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 22(1), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0119-5. CrossRefPubMed

42.

Petersen, K. D., Chen, G., Mpundu-Kaambwa, C., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2018). Measuring health-related quality of life in adolescent populations: An empirical comparison of the CHU9D and the PedsQL™ 4.0 Short Form 15. Patient, 11(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0265-5. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D-CHN): a school-based study in China
Auteurs: Peirong Yang
Gang Chen
Peng Wang
Kejian Zhang
Feng Deng
Haifeng Yang
Guihua Zhuang
Publicatiedatum: 05-05-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1864-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2018

Quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal cancers undergoing chemotherapy

Scale development with small samples: a new application of longitudinal item response theory

PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores

Introduction to special section: test construction

Evaluation of options for presenting health-states from PROMIS® item banks for valuation exercises

Coping mediates the relationship between sense of coherence and mental quality of life in patients with chronic illness: a cross-sectional study