Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

24-05-2018 | Uitgave 9/2018

Quality of Life Research 9/2018

SF-6D population norms for the Hong Kong Chinese general population

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 9/2018
Auteurs:
Carlos K. H. Wong, Brendan Mulhern, Garvin H. L. Cheng, Cindy L. K. Lam
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-018-1887-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate population norms for the SF-6D health preference (utility) scores derived from the MOS SF-36 version 1 (SF-36v1), SF-36 version 2 (SF-36v2), and (SF-12v2) health surveys collected from a representative adult sample in Hong Kong, and to assess differences in SF-6D scores across sociodemographic subgroups.

Methods

A random telephone survey of 2410 Chinese adults was conducted. All respondents completed questionnaires on sociodemographics and presence of chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, chronic rheumatism, chronic lung diseases, stroke, and mental illness), and the short-form 36-item health survey (SF-36) version 1, and selected items of the SF-36v2 that were different from those of SF-36v1. Responses of short-form 12-item health survey (SF-12) were extracted from responses of the SF-36 items. SF-6D health utility scores were derived from SF-36 version 1 (SF-6DSF-36v1), SF-36 version 2 (SF-6DSF-36v2), and SF-12 version 2 (SF-6DSF-12v2) using Hong Kong SF-6D value set.

Results

Population norms of SF-6DSF-36v1, SF-6DSF-36v2, and SF-6DSF-12v2 for the Hong Kong Chinese were 0.7947 (± 0.0048), 0.7862 (± 0.0049), and 0.8147 (± 0.0050), respectively. Three SF-6D scores were highly correlated (0.861–0.954), and had a high degree of reliability and absolute agreement. Males had higher health utility scores (SF-6DSF-36v1: 0.0025; SF-6DSF-36v2: 0.025; SF-6DSF-12v2: 0.018) but reported less problems in all the dimensions than women. Respondents with a higher number of chronic diseases had lower SF-6D scores. Among all respondents with one or more chronic diseases, those with hypertension scored the highest whereby those with mental illness scored the least.

Conclusions

The SF-6D utility scores derived from different SF-36 or SF-12 health surveys were different. The population norms based on these three health surveys enable the normative comparisons of health utility scores from specific population or patient groups, and provide estimates of age–gender adjusted health utility scores for health economic evaluations.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 53 KB)
11136_2018_1887_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 57 KB)
11136_2018_1887_MOESM2_ESM.doc
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 58 KB)
11136_2018_1887_MOESM3_ESM.doc
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2018

Quality of Life Research 9/2018 Naar de uitgave