Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Urologie 6/2011

01-10-2011 | Robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie in een perifeer ziekenhuis

Robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie in een perifeer ziekenhuis: perioperatieve parameters en korte termijn functionele en oncologische resultaten bij de eerste 400 patiënten

Auteurs: S.S. Rambaran, D. van den Ouden, M. Kliffen, D.C.D. de Lange, O.S. Klaver

Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Urologie | Uitgave 6/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Doelstelling:

Rapportage van de eerste 400 robotgeassisteerde radicale prostatectomieën (RALP), uitgevoerd in een perifeer ziekenhuis van januari 2009 tot en met januari 2011.

Methoden:

Pre- en postoperatieve oncologische parameters, operatieve karakteristieken en functionele en oncologische resultaten werden prospectief in een database verzameld. PSA-stijging (PSA ≥ 0,2) werd gebruikt als surrogaateindpunt voor progressie. Continentie en potentie werden geëvalueerd met behulp van gevalideerde vragenlijsten. Alle ingrepen werden uitgevoerd door 1 chirurg.

Resultaten:

De gemiddelde operatietijd bedroeg 125 minuten, het gemiddeld bloedverlies 329 ml en de gemiddelde opnameduur was 3,7 dagen. Complicaties traden op bij 5,8% van de patiënten. Een positief snijvlak werd gezien bij 77 van de 400 patiënten (19,2%). Het percentage positieve snijvlakken in de pT2- en de pT3-groep bedroeg respectievelijk 13,4% en 34,5%. Bij 73,5% van de patiënten werd een intermediair of hoogoncologisch risicoprofiel (Risicoclassificatie van D’Amico) vastgesteld. Na 12 maanden follow-up (n = 130) werd PSA-progressie vastgesteld bij 13,1% van de patiënten, was 90,2% van de patiënten continent en 60,7% van de preoperatief potente patiënten potent.

Conclusie:

RALP uitgevoerd in een hoogvolumekliniek gaat gepaard met zeer acceptabele morbiditeit en mortaliteit en met goede oncologische en functionele resultaten in een groep met een hoog percentage oncologisch intermediaire en hoogrisicopatiënten.
Literatuur
1.
2.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS, et al. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). J Urol. 2003;170:S21–25; discussion S26–27. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS, et al. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE). J Urol. 2003;170:S21–25; discussion S26–27.
3.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53:68–80.PubMedCrossRef Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53:68–80.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1144–1154.PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1144–1154.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Scandinavian prostate cancer group study no. 4. Radival prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–1984.PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Scandinavian prostate cancer group study no. 4. Radival prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–1984.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1708–1772.PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1708–1772.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R, et al. A competing-risk analysis of survival after alternative treatment modalities for prostate cancer patients: 1988–2006. Eur Urol. 2010;59:88–95.PubMedCrossRef Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R, et al. A competing-risk analysis of survival after alternative treatment modalities for prostate cancer patients: 1988–2006. Eur Urol. 2010;59:88–95.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference González-San Segundo C, Herranz-Amo F, Alvarez-González A, et al. Radical Prostatectomy Versus External-Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Effect on Biochemical Control-In Search of the Optimal Treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 2011 Mar 23. González-San Segundo C, Herranz-Amo F, Alvarez-González A, et al. Radical Prostatectomy Versus External-Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Effect on Biochemical Control-In Search of the Optimal Treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
10.
go back to reference Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J. Urol. 1982;128:492–497.PubMed Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J. Urol. 1982;128:492–497.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Guillonneau B, Catelineau X, Barret E, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assesment of 40 operations. Eur Urol. 1999;36:14–20.PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Catelineau X, Barret E, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assesment of 40 operations. Eur Urol. 1999;36:14–20.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, et al. Vattikutti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radicale prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31:701–717.PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, et al. Vattikutti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radicale prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31:701–717.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learningcurve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475–480.PubMedCrossRef Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learningcurve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475–480.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Da Vinci Prostatectomy. Full-Length Procedure da Vinci Prostatectomy with the 4th arm, Patel VR, MD. DVD-ROM. PN 871489 Rev. B 4/07. Da Vinci Prostatectomy. Full-Length Procedure da Vinci Prostatectomy with the 4th arm, Patel VR, MD. DVD-ROM. PN 871489 Rev. B 4/07.
15.
go back to reference Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol. 2007;52:376–383.PubMedCrossRef Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol. 2007;52:376–383.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):472–478.PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):472–478.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference D’Amico A, Altschuler M, Whittington R, et al. The use of clinical parameters in an interactive statistical package to predict pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1993;1:219–222.PubMed D’Amico A, Altschuler M, Whittington R, et al. The use of clinical parameters in an interactive statistical package to predict pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1993;1:219–222.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th edn. New York: Springer; 2002. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th edn. New York: Springer; 2002.
20.
go back to reference Vainer B, Toft BG, Olsen KE, et al. Handeling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding? Histopathology. 2011;58(2):211–216.PubMedCrossRef Vainer B, Toft BG, Olsen KE, et al. Handeling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding? Histopathology. 2011;58(2):211–216.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;244:931–937. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;244:931–937.
22.
go back to reference Bianco FJ Jr., Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (trifecta). Urology. 2005;66(Suppl.):83–94.PubMedCrossRef Bianco FJ Jr., Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (trifecta). Urology. 2005;66(Suppl.):83–94.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009;103:448–453.PubMedCrossRef Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009;103:448–453.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178:2385–9; discussion 2389–90. Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178:2385–9; discussion 2389–90.
25.
go back to reference Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92:205–210.PubMedCrossRef Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92:205–210.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kasraeian A, Barret E, Chan J, et al. Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2011; Mar 10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464–410X.2010.10077.x. Kasraeian A, Barret E, Chan J, et al. Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2011; Mar 10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464–410X.2010.10077.x.
27.
go back to reference Giberti C, Schenone M, Gallo F, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): the ‘real’ learning curve. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10(2):125.CrossRef Giberti C, Schenone M, Gallo F, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): the ‘real’ learning curve. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10(2):125.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sooriakumaran P, John M, Leung R, et al. A multi-institutional study of 3794 patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy shows the learning curve is not as short as previously thought. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10(2):127.CrossRef Sooriakumaran P, John M, Leung R, et al. A multi-institutional study of 3794 patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy shows the learning curve is not as short as previously thought. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10(2):127.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pthological outcomes with interfacial nerve preservation. Eur Urol. 2007;99:1171–1177. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pthological outcomes with interfacial nerve preservation. Eur Urol. 2007;99:1171–1177.
30.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, nonrandomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009;104:534–539.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, nonrandomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009;104:534–539.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Carsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology. 2010;75:1092–1097.CrossRef Carsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology. 2010;75:1092–1097.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and cumulative analysis of comparitive studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037–1063.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and cumulative analysis of comparitive studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037–1063.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1138–1144.PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1138–1144.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM, et al. Comparitive effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol. 2010;183:1366–1372.PubMedCrossRef Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM, et al. Comparitive effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol. 2010;183:1366–1372.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, et al. Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med; 2011. Feb 16. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02215.x Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, et al. Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med; 2011. Feb 16. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02215.x
36.
go back to reference Nielsen ME, Schaeffer EM, Marschke P, et al. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180:2557–64, discussion 2564. Nielsen ME, Schaeffer EM, Marschke P, et al. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180:2557–64, discussion 2564.
37.
go back to reference Hong YM, Sutherland DE, Linder B, et al. ‘Learning curve’ may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010;Mar;24(3):473–477.PubMedCrossRef Hong YM, Sutherland DE, Linder B, et al. ‘Learning curve’ may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010;Mar;24(3):473–477.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Vis A, Basten JP van, Beerlage H, et al. Landelijke database robot gassisteerde laparoscopische prostatectomie (RALP). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Urologie 2010;6-2010: 164. Vis A, Basten JP van, Beerlage H, et al. Landelijke database robot gassisteerde laparoscopische prostatectomie (RALP). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Urologie 2010;6-2010: 164.
Metagegevens
Titel
Robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie in een perifeer ziekenhuis: perioperatieve parameters en korte termijn functionele en oncologische resultaten bij de eerste 400 patiënten
Auteurs
S.S. Rambaran
D. van den Ouden
M. Kliffen
D.C.D. de Lange
O.S. Klaver
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2011
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Tijdschrift voor Urologie / Uitgave 6/2011
Print ISSN: 2211-3037
Elektronisch ISSN: 2211-4718
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-011-0058-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2011

Tijdschrift voor Urologie 6/2011 Naar de uitgave

Mictiegerelateerde zwelling van het scrotum

Mictiegerelateerde zwelling van het scrotum: een casus

Editorial

Editorial

Noodzaak tot zelfkatheterisatie na intravesicale botulinetoxine-A-injecties

Noodzaak tot zelfkatheterisatie na intravesicale botulinetoxine-A-injecties

Een ulcus op de penis als eerste manifestatie van morbus Wegener

Een ulcus op de penis als eerste manifestatie van morbus Wegener

Sentinel-nodebiopsie bij peniscarcinoom na eerdere primaire tumorbehandeling

Sentinel-nodebiopsie voor stadiëring van de lies bij peniscarcinoom na eerdere primaire tumorbehandeling