Ga naar de hoofdinhoud
Top

Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the national eye institute visual-function questionnaire-25 for utility estimation

  • 01-03-2012
Gepubliceerd in:

Abstract

Purpose

Preference-based health measures value how people feel about the desirability of a health state. Generic measures may not effectively capture the impact of vision loss from ocular diseases. Disease-targeted measures could address this limitation. This study developed a vision-targeted health state classification system based on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25).

Methods

Secondary analysis of NEI VFQ-25 data from studies of patients with central (n = 932)- and peripheral-vision loss (n = 2,451) were used to develop a health state classification system. Classical test theory and Rasch analyses were used to identify a smaller set of NEI VFQ-25 items suitable for the central- and peripheral-vision-loss groups.

Results

Rasch analysis of the NEI VFQ-25 items using the peripheral vision–loss data indicated that 11 items fit a unidimensional model, while 14 NEI VFQ-25 items fit using the central-vision-loss data. Combining peripheral-vision-loss data and central-vision-loss data resulted in 9 items fitting a unidimensional model. Six items covering near vision, distance vision, social vision, role difficulties, vision dependency, and vision-related mental health were selected for the health-state classification.

Conclusions

The derived health-state classification system covers relevant domains of vision-related functioning and well-being.
Titel
Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the national eye institute visual-function questionnaire-25 for utility estimation
Auteurs
Jonathan W. Kowalski
Anne M. Rentz
John G. Walt
Andrew Lloyd
Jeff Lee
Tracey A. Young
Wen-Hung Chen
Neil M. Bressler
Paul Lee
John E. Brazier
Ron D. Hays
Dennis A. Revicki
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9938-z
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.