Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2020

05-05-2020 | Original Article

Psychometric Properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Sample of Canadian Children

Auteurs: Vivian Huang, Julia DiMillo, Diana Koszycki

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 5/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The parental bonding instrument (PBI) is a self-report questionnaire that was initially designed to retrospectively assess perceived parenting style during childhood in adult respondents. Recent studies have used the PBI to assess current perception of parenting in children. However, few studies have evaluated the psychometric properties of the PBI in children. This study examined the factor structure and reliability of the PBI in a sample of Canadian children aged 7–18 years (n = 257). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted separately for the mother and father form of the PBI and composite reliability was used to determine internal consistency of the PBI. A four-factor model (care, overprotection, autonomy, indifference) showed the best fit to the data. The PBI exhibited good internal consistency but poor convergent validity. Configural invariance was not found for the PBI between two age groups (7–12 and 13–18 years), however these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size in each age group. This study suggests the PBI may be a valid and reliable self-report measure of parental bonding in children but further research is needed.
vorige artikel Adaptation of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders in Spanish with Nonspecific Intellectual Disability
volgende artikel InterRAI Child and Youth Mental Health-Screener (ChYMH-S): A Psychometric Evaluation and Validation Study
Literatuur
1.
Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB (1979) A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol 52:1–10
2.
Wilhelm K, Niven H, Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D (2005) The stability of the parentalbonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychol Med 35:387–393PubMed
3.
Tsaousis I, Mascha K, Giovazolias T (2012) Can parental bonding be assessed in children? Factor structure and factorial invariance of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) between adults and children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 43:238–253PubMed
4.
Parker G (1990) The parental bonding instrument: a decade of research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 25:281–282PubMed
5.
Stafford M, Kuh DL, Gale CR, Mishra G, Richards M (2016) Parent–child relationships and offspring’s positive mental wellbeing from adolescence to early older age. J Posit Psychol 11:326–337PubMed
6.
Fendrich M, Warner V, Weissman MM (1990) Family risk factors, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring. Dev Psychol 26:40–50
7.
Koszycki D, Bilodeau C, Zwanzger P, Schneider BH, Flament MF, Bradwejn J (2013) Parental bonds of children at high and low familial risk for panic disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44:278–289PubMed
8.
Mitsopoulou E, Giovazolias T (2013) The relationship between perceived parental bonding and bullying: the mediating role of empathy. Eur J Counsel Psychol 2:1–16
9.
Li C (2016) Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods 48:936–949PubMed
10.
Reuterskiöld L (2009) Fears, anxieties and cognitive behavioral treatment of specific phobias in youth. University of Stockholm, Stockholm
11.
Stein D, Williamson DE, Birmaher B, Brent DA, Kaufman J, Dahl RE et al (2000) Parent–child bonding and family functioning in depressed children and children at high risk and low risk for future depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:1387–1395PubMed
12.
Martin G, Bergen HA, Roeger L, Allison S (2004) Depression in young adolescents: investigations using 2 and 3 factor versions of the parental bonding instrument. J Nerv Ment Dis 192:650–657PubMed
13.
Canetti L, Bachar E (1997) Parental bonding and mental health in adolescence. Adolescence 32:381–394PubMed
14.
Young R, Lennie S, Minnis H (2011) Children’s perceptions of parental emotional neglect and control and psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:889–897PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Ong MY, Eilander J, Saw SM, Xie Y, Meaney MJ, Broekman BF (2018) The influence of perceived parenting styles on socio-emotional development from pre-puberty into puberty. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:1–10
16.
Mannarini S, Balottin L, Palmieri A, Carotenuto F (2018) Emotion regulation and parental bonding in families of adolescents with internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Front Psychol 9:1–9
17.
Cubis J, Lewin T, Dawes F (1989) Australian adolescents’ perceptions of their parents. Aust NZ J Psychiat 23:35–47
18.
Sato T, Narita T, Hirano S, Kusunoki K, Sakado K, Uehara T (1999) Confirmatory factor analysis of the parental bonding instrument in a Japanese population. Psychol Med 29:127–133PubMed
19.
Heider D, Matschinger H, Bernert S, Vilagut G, Martınez-Alonso M, Dietrich S et al (2005) Empirical evidence for an invariant three-factor structure of the parental bonding instrument in six European countries. Psychiatry Res 135:237–247PubMed
20.
Behzadi B, Parker G (2015) A Persian version of the parental bonding instrument: factor structure and psychometric properties. Psychiatry Res 225:580–587PubMed
21.
Liu J, Li L, Fang F (2011) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the parental bonding instrument. Int J Nurs Stud 48:582–589PubMed
22.
Cappelli L, Verrastro V, Petruccelli I, Diotaiuti P, Petruccelli F, Dentale F et al (2015) Factor structure and criterion validity of an enlarged version of the parental bonding instrument. Int J Psychol Psychologic T 15:219–228
23.
Uji M, Tanaka N, Shono M, Kitamura T (2006) Factorial structure of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) in Japan: a study of cultural, developmental, and gender influences. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:115–132PubMed
24.
25.
Hein D, Matzner F, First M, Spitzer R, Williams J, Gibbon M (1998) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV childhood diagnoses, KID-SCID. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical School, New York
26.
Silverman WK, Albano AM (1996) Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM- IV: parent interview schedule. Oxford University Press, San Antonio
27.
Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Zararsiz G (2014) MVN: an R package for assessing multivariate normality. R J 6:151–162
28.
29.
Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55
30.
Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edn. Guilford Press, New York
31.
Raykov T (1997) Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl Psychol Meas 21:173–184
32.
33.
Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
34.
Byrne BM (2004) Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: a road less traveled. Struct Equ Modeling 11:272–300
35.
Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 14:464–504
36.
Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36
37.
38.
Browne MW (1984) Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. Brit J Math Stat Psy 37(1):62–83
39.
40.
Choi J, Peters M, Mueller RO (2010) Correlational analysis of ordinal data: from Pearson’s r to Bayesian polychoric correlation. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 11:459–466
41.
Gómez-Beneyto M, Pedrós A, Tomás A, Aguilar K, Leal C (1993) Psychometric properties of the parental bonding instrument in a spanish sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 28:252–255PubMed
42.
Kendler KS (1996) Parenting: a genetic-epidemiologic perspective. Am J Psychiatry 153:11–20PubMed
43.
Qadir F, Stewart R, Khan M, Prince M (2005) The validity of the parental bonding instrument as a measure of maternal bonding among young Pakistani women. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:276–282PubMed
44.
Mohr S, Preisig M, Fenton BT, Ferrero F (1999) Validation of the French version of the parental bonding instrument in adults. Pers Individ Differ 26:1065–1074
45.
Murphy E, Brewin CR, Silka L (1997) The assessment of parenting using the parental bonding instrument: two or three factors? Psychol Med 27:333–342PubMed
46.
Huang C-Y, Lamb ME (2014) Acculturation and parenting in first-generation Chinese imigrants in the United Kingdom. J Cross-Cult Psychol 46:150–167
47.
Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253
48.
Markus HR, Kitayama S (2010) Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect on Psychol Sci 5:420–430
49.
50.
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric Properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Sample of Canadian Children
Auteurs
Vivian Huang
Julia DiMillo
Diana Koszycki
Publicatiedatum
05-05-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-00999-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2020

Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2020 Naar de uitgave

Original Article

Adaptation of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders in Spanish with Nonspecific Intellectual Disability

Correction

Correction to: Retrospective Assessment of Behavioral Inhibition in Infants and Toddlers: Development of a Parent Report Questionnaire

Original Article

Initial Challenges of Caregiving During COVID-19: Caregiver Burden, Mental Health, and the Parent–Child Relationship

Original Article

Parent Management Training Oregon Model and Family-Based Services as Usual for Behavioral Problems in Youth: A National Randomized Controlled Trial in Denmark

Original Article

Behavioural Problems in a Nationally Representative Sample of Uruguay. Characterisation of Latent Profiles by Socioeconomic Status, Maternal Depression and Family Violence

Original Article

The Temporal Precedence of Peer Rejection, Rejection Sensitivity, Depression, and Aggression Across Adolescence