Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development 5/2020

05-05-2020 | Original Article

Psychometric Properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Sample of Canadian Children

Auteurs: Vivian Huang, Julia DiMillo, Diana Koszycki

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 5/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The parental bonding instrument (PBI) is a self-report questionnaire that was initially designed to retrospectively assess perceived parenting style during childhood in adult respondents. Recent studies have used the PBI to assess current perception of parenting in children. However, few studies have evaluated the psychometric properties of the PBI in children. This study examined the factor structure and reliability of the PBI in a sample of Canadian children aged 7–18 years (n = 257). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted separately for the mother and father form of the PBI and composite reliability was used to determine internal consistency of the PBI. A four-factor model (care, overprotection, autonomy, indifference) showed the best fit to the data. The PBI exhibited good internal consistency but poor convergent validity. Configural invariance was not found for the PBI between two age groups (7–12 and 13–18 years), however these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size in each age group. This study suggests the PBI may be a valid and reliable self-report measure of parental bonding in children but further research is needed.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB (1979) A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol 52:1–10 Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB (1979) A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol 52:1–10
2.
go back to reference Wilhelm K, Niven H, Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D (2005) The stability of the parentalbonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychol Med 35:387–393 PubMed Wilhelm K, Niven H, Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D (2005) The stability of the parentalbonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychol Med 35:387–393 PubMed
3.
go back to reference Tsaousis I, Mascha K, Giovazolias T (2012) Can parental bonding be assessed in children? Factor structure and factorial invariance of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) between adults and children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 43:238–253 PubMed Tsaousis I, Mascha K, Giovazolias T (2012) Can parental bonding be assessed in children? Factor structure and factorial invariance of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) between adults and children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 43:238–253 PubMed
4.
go back to reference Parker G (1990) The parental bonding instrument: a decade of research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 25:281–282 PubMed Parker G (1990) The parental bonding instrument: a decade of research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 25:281–282 PubMed
5.
go back to reference Stafford M, Kuh DL, Gale CR, Mishra G, Richards M (2016) Parent–child relationships and offspring’s positive mental wellbeing from adolescence to early older age. J Posit Psychol 11:326–337 PubMed Stafford M, Kuh DL, Gale CR, Mishra G, Richards M (2016) Parent–child relationships and offspring’s positive mental wellbeing from adolescence to early older age. J Posit Psychol 11:326–337 PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fendrich M, Warner V, Weissman MM (1990) Family risk factors, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring. Dev Psychol 26:40–50 Fendrich M, Warner V, Weissman MM (1990) Family risk factors, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring. Dev Psychol 26:40–50
7.
go back to reference Koszycki D, Bilodeau C, Zwanzger P, Schneider BH, Flament MF, Bradwejn J (2013) Parental bonds of children at high and low familial risk for panic disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44:278–289 PubMed Koszycki D, Bilodeau C, Zwanzger P, Schneider BH, Flament MF, Bradwejn J (2013) Parental bonds of children at high and low familial risk for panic disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44:278–289 PubMed
8.
go back to reference Mitsopoulou E, Giovazolias T (2013) The relationship between perceived parental bonding and bullying: the mediating role of empathy. Eur J Counsel Psychol 2:1–16 Mitsopoulou E, Giovazolias T (2013) The relationship between perceived parental bonding and bullying: the mediating role of empathy. Eur J Counsel Psychol 2:1–16
9.
go back to reference Li C (2016) Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods 48:936–949 PubMed Li C (2016) Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods 48:936–949 PubMed
10.
go back to reference Reuterskiöld L (2009) Fears, anxieties and cognitive behavioral treatment of specific phobias in youth. University of Stockholm, Stockholm Reuterskiöld L (2009) Fears, anxieties and cognitive behavioral treatment of specific phobias in youth. University of Stockholm, Stockholm
11.
go back to reference Stein D, Williamson DE, Birmaher B, Brent DA, Kaufman J, Dahl RE et al (2000) Parent–child bonding and family functioning in depressed children and children at high risk and low risk for future depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:1387–1395 PubMed Stein D, Williamson DE, Birmaher B, Brent DA, Kaufman J, Dahl RE et al (2000) Parent–child bonding and family functioning in depressed children and children at high risk and low risk for future depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:1387–1395 PubMed
12.
go back to reference Martin G, Bergen HA, Roeger L, Allison S (2004) Depression in young adolescents: investigations using 2 and 3 factor versions of the parental bonding instrument. J Nerv Ment Dis 192:650–657 PubMed Martin G, Bergen HA, Roeger L, Allison S (2004) Depression in young adolescents: investigations using 2 and 3 factor versions of the parental bonding instrument. J Nerv Ment Dis 192:650–657 PubMed
13.
go back to reference Canetti L, Bachar E (1997) Parental bonding and mental health in adolescence. Adolescence 32:381–394 PubMed Canetti L, Bachar E (1997) Parental bonding and mental health in adolescence. Adolescence 32:381–394 PubMed
14.
go back to reference Young R, Lennie S, Minnis H (2011) Children’s perceptions of parental emotional neglect and control and psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:889–897 PubMedPubMedCentral Young R, Lennie S, Minnis H (2011) Children’s perceptions of parental emotional neglect and control and psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:889–897 PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Ong MY, Eilander J, Saw SM, Xie Y, Meaney MJ, Broekman BF (2018) The influence of perceived parenting styles on socio-emotional development from pre-puberty into puberty. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:1–10 Ong MY, Eilander J, Saw SM, Xie Y, Meaney MJ, Broekman BF (2018) The influence of perceived parenting styles on socio-emotional development from pre-puberty into puberty. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:1–10
16.
go back to reference Mannarini S, Balottin L, Palmieri A, Carotenuto F (2018) Emotion regulation and parental bonding in families of adolescents with internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Front Psychol 9:1–9 Mannarini S, Balottin L, Palmieri A, Carotenuto F (2018) Emotion regulation and parental bonding in families of adolescents with internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Front Psychol 9:1–9
17.
go back to reference Cubis J, Lewin T, Dawes F (1989) Australian adolescents’ perceptions of their parents. Aust NZ J Psychiat 23:35–47 Cubis J, Lewin T, Dawes F (1989) Australian adolescents’ perceptions of their parents. Aust NZ J Psychiat 23:35–47
18.
go back to reference Sato T, Narita T, Hirano S, Kusunoki K, Sakado K, Uehara T (1999) Confirmatory factor analysis of the parental bonding instrument in a Japanese population. Psychol Med 29:127–133 PubMed Sato T, Narita T, Hirano S, Kusunoki K, Sakado K, Uehara T (1999) Confirmatory factor analysis of the parental bonding instrument in a Japanese population. Psychol Med 29:127–133 PubMed
19.
go back to reference Heider D, Matschinger H, Bernert S, Vilagut G, Martınez-Alonso M, Dietrich S et al (2005) Empirical evidence for an invariant three-factor structure of the parental bonding instrument in six European countries. Psychiatry Res 135:237–247 PubMed Heider D, Matschinger H, Bernert S, Vilagut G, Martınez-Alonso M, Dietrich S et al (2005) Empirical evidence for an invariant three-factor structure of the parental bonding instrument in six European countries. Psychiatry Res 135:237–247 PubMed
20.
go back to reference Behzadi B, Parker G (2015) A Persian version of the parental bonding instrument: factor structure and psychometric properties. Psychiatry Res 225:580–587 PubMed Behzadi B, Parker G (2015) A Persian version of the parental bonding instrument: factor structure and psychometric properties. Psychiatry Res 225:580–587 PubMed
21.
go back to reference Liu J, Li L, Fang F (2011) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the parental bonding instrument. Int J Nurs Stud 48:582–589 PubMed Liu J, Li L, Fang F (2011) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the parental bonding instrument. Int J Nurs Stud 48:582–589 PubMed
22.
go back to reference Cappelli L, Verrastro V, Petruccelli I, Diotaiuti P, Petruccelli F, Dentale F et al (2015) Factor structure and criterion validity of an enlarged version of the parental bonding instrument. Int J Psychol Psychologic T 15:219–228 Cappelli L, Verrastro V, Petruccelli I, Diotaiuti P, Petruccelli F, Dentale F et al (2015) Factor structure and criterion validity of an enlarged version of the parental bonding instrument. Int J Psychol Psychologic T 15:219–228
23.
go back to reference Uji M, Tanaka N, Shono M, Kitamura T (2006) Factorial structure of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) in Japan: a study of cultural, developmental, and gender influences. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:115–132 PubMed Uji M, Tanaka N, Shono M, Kitamura T (2006) Factorial structure of the parental bonding instrument (PBI) in Japan: a study of cultural, developmental, and gender influences. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:115–132 PubMed
25.
go back to reference Hein D, Matzner F, First M, Spitzer R, Williams J, Gibbon M (1998) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV childhood diagnoses, KID-SCID. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical School, New York Hein D, Matzner F, First M, Spitzer R, Williams J, Gibbon M (1998) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV childhood diagnoses, KID-SCID. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical School, New York
26.
go back to reference Silverman WK, Albano AM (1996) Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM- IV: parent interview schedule. Oxford University Press, San Antonio Silverman WK, Albano AM (1996) Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM- IV: parent interview schedule. Oxford University Press, San Antonio
27.
go back to reference Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Zararsiz G (2014) MVN: an R package for assessing multivariate normality. R J 6:151–162 Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Zararsiz G (2014) MVN: an R package for assessing multivariate normality. R J 6:151–162
29.
go back to reference Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55 Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55
30.
go back to reference Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edn. Guilford Press, New York Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edn. Guilford Press, New York
31.
go back to reference Raykov T (1997) Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl Psychol Meas 21:173–184 Raykov T (1997) Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl Psychol Meas 21:173–184
33.
go back to reference Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
34.
go back to reference Byrne BM (2004) Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: a road less traveled. Struct Equ Modeling 11:272–300 Byrne BM (2004) Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: a road less traveled. Struct Equ Modeling 11:272–300
35.
go back to reference Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 14:464–504 Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 14:464–504
36.
go back to reference Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36 Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36
38.
go back to reference Browne MW (1984) Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. Brit J Math Stat Psy 37(1):62–83 Browne MW (1984) Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. Brit J Math Stat Psy 37(1):62–83
40.
go back to reference Choi J, Peters M, Mueller RO (2010) Correlational analysis of ordinal data: from Pearson’s r to Bayesian polychoric correlation. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 11:459–466 Choi J, Peters M, Mueller RO (2010) Correlational analysis of ordinal data: from Pearson’s r to Bayesian polychoric correlation. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 11:459–466
41.
go back to reference Gómez-Beneyto M, Pedrós A, Tomás A, Aguilar K, Leal C (1993) Psychometric properties of the parental bonding instrument in a spanish sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 28:252–255 PubMed Gómez-Beneyto M, Pedrós A, Tomás A, Aguilar K, Leal C (1993) Psychometric properties of the parental bonding instrument in a spanish sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 28:252–255 PubMed
42.
go back to reference Kendler KS (1996) Parenting: a genetic-epidemiologic perspective. Am J Psychiatry 153:11–20 PubMed Kendler KS (1996) Parenting: a genetic-epidemiologic perspective. Am J Psychiatry 153:11–20 PubMed
43.
go back to reference Qadir F, Stewart R, Khan M, Prince M (2005) The validity of the parental bonding instrument as a measure of maternal bonding among young Pakistani women. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:276–282 PubMed Qadir F, Stewart R, Khan M, Prince M (2005) The validity of the parental bonding instrument as a measure of maternal bonding among young Pakistani women. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:276–282 PubMed
44.
go back to reference Mohr S, Preisig M, Fenton BT, Ferrero F (1999) Validation of the French version of the parental bonding instrument in adults. Pers Individ Differ 26:1065–1074 Mohr S, Preisig M, Fenton BT, Ferrero F (1999) Validation of the French version of the parental bonding instrument in adults. Pers Individ Differ 26:1065–1074
45.
go back to reference Murphy E, Brewin CR, Silka L (1997) The assessment of parenting using the parental bonding instrument: two or three factors? Psychol Med 27:333–342 PubMed Murphy E, Brewin CR, Silka L (1997) The assessment of parenting using the parental bonding instrument: two or three factors? Psychol Med 27:333–342 PubMed
46.
go back to reference Huang C-Y, Lamb ME (2014) Acculturation and parenting in first-generation Chinese imigrants in the United Kingdom. J Cross-Cult Psychol 46:150–167 Huang C-Y, Lamb ME (2014) Acculturation and parenting in first-generation Chinese imigrants in the United Kingdom. J Cross-Cult Psychol 46:150–167
47.
go back to reference Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253 Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253
48.
go back to reference Markus HR, Kitayama S (2010) Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect on Psychol Sci 5:420–430 Markus HR, Kitayama S (2010) Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect on Psychol Sci 5:420–430
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric Properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Sample of Canadian Children
Auteurs
Vivian Huang
Julia DiMillo
Diana Koszycki
Publicatiedatum
05-05-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-00999-2