Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2010

Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

Auteurs: Keh-Chung Lin, Tiffany Fu, Ching-Yi Wu, Yu-Wei Hsieh, Chia-Ling Chen, Pei-Chin Lee

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the responsiveness and criterion-related validity of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) for patients after stroke rehabilitation.

Methods

The SIS and SS-QOL, along with five criterion measures—the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Motor Activity Log, the Functional Independence Measure, the Frenchay Activities Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale—were administered to 74 patients with stroke before and after a 3-week intervention. Responsiveness was examined using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and standardized response mean (SRM). Criterion-related validity was investigated using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ).

Results

Whereas the SS-QOL subscales were nonresponsive to changes, the SIS hand function showed medium responsiveness (SRM = .52, Wilcoxon Z = 4.24, P < .05). Responsiveness of the SIS total also was significantly larger than that of the SS-QOL total (SRM difference, .36; 95% confidence interval, .02–.71). Criterion validity of the SIS hand function was good (ρ = .51–.68; P < .01), but that of the SS-QOL was only fair (ρ = .25–.31; P < .05).

Conclusion

Because the SIS had better overall responsiveness and the SIS hand function showed medium responsiveness and good criterion validity, the SIS appears to be more suited for assessing changes after stroke rehabilitation.
vorige artikel Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in a study of people with mild to moderate dementia
volgende artikel Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale
Literatuur
1.
Saxena, S. K. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in stroke patients in a rehabilitation setting. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10, 37–47.
2.
Stephens, S., Kenny, R. A., Rowan, E., Kalaria, R. N., Bradbury, M., Pearce, R., et al. (2005). Association between mild vascular cognitive impairment and impaired activities of daily living in older stroke survivors without dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 103–107.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Salter, K. L., Moses, M. B., Foley, N. C., & Teasell, R. W. (2008). Health-related quality of life after stroke: What are we measuring? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31, 111–117.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Schepers, V. P. M., Ketelaar, M., van de Port, I. G. L., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., & Lindeman, E. (2007). Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 221–230.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Wu, C. Y., & Chen, Y. A. (2009). Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 441–448.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lin, K. C., Wu, C. Y., Liu, J. S., Chen, Y. T., & Hsu, C. J. (2009). Constraint-induced therapy versus dose-matched control intervention to improve motor ability, basic/extended daily functions and quality of life in stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 160–165.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Czechowsky, D., & Hill, M. D. (2002). Neurological outcome and quality of life after stroke due to vertebral artery dissection. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 13, 192–197.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Erban, P., Woertgen, C., Luerding, R., Bogdahn, U., Schlachetzki, F., & Horn, M. (2006). Long-term outcome after hemicraniectomy for space occupying right hemispheric MCA infarction. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 108, 384–387.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.PubMed
10.
Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 950–963.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Duncan, P. W., Jorgensen, H. S., & Wade, D. T. (2000). Outcome measures in acute stroke trials. A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke, 31, 1429–1438.PubMed
12.
Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30, 1362–1369.PubMed
13.
Carod-Artal, F. J., Coral, L. F., Trizotto, D. S., & Moreira, C. M. (2008). The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke, 39, 2477–2484.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Duncan, P., Reker, D., Kwon, S., Lai, S. M., Studenski, S., Perera, S., et al. (2005). Measuring stroke impact with the Stroke Impact Scale. Telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Medical Care, 43, 507–515.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kwon, S., Duncan, P., Studenski, S., Perera, S., Lai, S. M., & Reker, D. (2006). Measuring stroke impact with SIS: Construct validity of SIS telephone administration. Quality of Life Research, 15, 367–376.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Muus, I., Williams, L. S., & Ringsberg, K. C. (2007). Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL): Test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK). Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 620–627.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ewert, T., & Stucki, G. (2007). Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in survivors of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 161–168.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Shaikh, N., Marin, J. M., Casey, J. R., Pichichero, M. E., Wald, E. R., Colborn, D. K., et al. (2009). Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for children with streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatrics, 124, e557–e563.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life—the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. New York: Wiley.
20.
Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., 3rd, Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C. S., et al. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347–354.PubMed
21.
McCombe Waller, S., & Whitall, J. (2008). Bilateral arm training: Why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 29–41.PubMed
22.
Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., et al. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 296, 2095–2104.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Lin, K. C., Chen, Y. A., Chen, C. L., Wu, C. Y., & Chang, Y. A. (2010). The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24, 42–51.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Barnes, M. P., Dobkin, B. H., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2009). Recovery after stroke. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Brunnstrom, S. (1970). Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Bohannon, R., & Smith, M. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67, 206–207.PubMed
28.
Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The poststroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13–31.PubMed
29.
Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1993). The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1991. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 33–38.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166–170.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301–305.CrossRef
32.
Hays, R. D., Anderson, R., & Revicki, D. (1998). Chapter 10: Assessing Reliability and Validity of Measurement in Clinical Trials. In M. J. Staquet, R. D. Hays, & P. M. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessments in clinical trials (pp. 169–182). New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Kotsis, S. V., Chung, K. C., & Arbor, A. (2005). Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery, 30A, 81–86.
34.
Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
Yeo, D., Mantel, H., & Liu, T. P. (1999). Bootstrap variance estimation for the National Population Health Survey. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. Baltimore: American Statistical Association.
36.
Stratford, P. W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2004). Does parallel item content on WOMAC’s pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 5, 17.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
38.
Cano, S. J., O’Connor, R. J., Thompson, A. J., & Hobart, J. C. (2006). Exploring disability rating scale responsiveness II: Do more response options help? Neurology, 67, 2056–2059.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
40.
Hobart, J. C., Lamping, D. L., Freeman, J. A., Langdon, D. W., McLellan, D. L., Greenwood, R. J., et al. (2001). Evidence-based measurement. Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology, 57, 639–644.PubMed
41.
Moran, L. A., Guyatt, G. H., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Establishing the minimal number of items for a responsive, valid, health-related quality of life instrument. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 571–579.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Kong, K. H., & Yang, S. Y. (2006). Health-related quality of life among chronic stroke survivors attending a rehabilitation clinic. Singapore Medical Journal, 47, 213–218.PubMed
43.
Berg, A., Lonnqvist, J., Palomaki, H., & Kaste, M. (2009). Assessment of depression after stroke: A comparison of different screening instruments. Stroke, 40, 523–529.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale
Auteurs
Keh-Chung Lin
Tiffany Fu
Ching-Yi Wu
Yu-Wei Hsieh
Chia-Ling Chen
Pei-Chin Lee
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9597-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2010

Temporal changes in the causal foundations of palliative care symptoms

Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients

Are youth BMI and physical activity associated with better or worse than expected health-related quality of life in adulthood? The Physical Activity Longitudinal Study

Creating and using the CDC HRQOL healthy days index with fixed option survey responses

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale

Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in a study of people with mild to moderate dementia