Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

Phonotactic probability of brand names: I’d buy that!

Auteurs: Michael S. Vitevitch, Alexander J. Donoso

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Psycholinguistic research shows that word-characteristics influence the speed and accuracy of various language-related processes. Analogous characteristics of brand names influence the retrieval of product information and the perception of risks associated with that product. In the present experiment we examined how phonotactic probability—the frequency with which phonological segments and sequences of segments appear in a word—might influence consumer behavior. Participants rated brand names that varied in phonotactic probability on the likelihood that they would buy the product. Participants indicated that they were more likely to purchase a product if the brand name was comprised of common segments and sequences of segments rather than less common segments and sequences of segments. This result suggests that word-characteristics may influence higher-level cognitive processes, in addition to language-related processes. Furthermore, the benefits of using objective measures of word characteristics in the design of brand names are discussed.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Brand names themselves also warrant some attention from Psycholinguists and other Cognitive Scientists, because of the interesting ways in which they differ from more conventional words and proper names. For example, brand names, like real words and proper names, consist of a lexeme (i.e., the “word” or “name”) and a lemma (i.e., the referent, or the semantic or conceptual meaning). However, brand names also represent perceptions and opinions about the products they are associated with, have a “value” in the marketplace that can fluctuate over time, and can be used to indicate social status or affect one’s self-esteem. Furthermore, brand names not only differentiate one product from a similar product in the market, but they also can be used—in what appears to be circular logic—to justify a purchase decision (e.g., I bought this printer instead of that nearly identical printer because this printer is “Brand X” and that printer is not). Direct investigation of brand-names themselves is beyond the scope of the present investigation, however.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.CrossRef Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.CrossRef
go back to reference de Saussure, F. (1966). Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill. de Saussure, F. (1966). Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Ellis, A. W., Holmes, S. J., & Wright, R. L. (2010). Age of acquisition and the recognition of brand names: On the importance of being early. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 43–52.CrossRef Ellis, A. W., Holmes, S. J., & Wright, R. L. (2010). Age of acquisition and the recognition of brand names: On the importance of being early. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 43–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 515–523. Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 515–523.
go back to reference Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 84–95. Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 84–95.
go back to reference Hennessey, J. E., Bell, T. S., & Kwortnik, R. J. (2005). Lexical interference in semantic processing of simple words: Implications for brand names. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 51–69.CrossRef Hennessey, J. E., Bell, T. S., & Kwortnik, R. J. (2005). Lexical interference in semantic processing of simple words: Implications for brand names. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 51–69.CrossRef
go back to reference Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2009). The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science, 20, 231–237.CrossRefPubMed Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2009). The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science, 20, 231–237.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.CrossRef Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.CrossRef
go back to reference Lambert, B. L. (1997). Predicting look-alike and sound-alike medication errors. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 54, 1161–1171.PubMed Lambert, B. L. (1997). Predicting look-alike and sound-alike medication errors. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 54, 1161–1171.PubMed
go back to reference Lambert, B. L., Dickey, L. W., Fisher, W. M., Gibbons, R. D., Luce, P. A., McLennan, C. T., Senders, J. W., & Yu, C. T. (2010). Listen carefully: The risk of error in spoken medication orders. Social Science and Medicine, 70(10):1599–1608.CrossRefPubMed Lambert, B. L., Dickey, L. W., Fisher, W. M., Gibbons, R. D., Luce, P. A., McLennan, C. T., Senders, J. W., & Yu, C. T. (2010). Listen carefully: The risk of error in spoken medication orders. Social Science and Medicine, 70(10):1599–1608.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lambert, B. L., Lin, S. J., & Tan, H. K. (2005). Designing safe drug names. Drug Safety, 28, 495–512.CrossRefPubMed Lambert, B. L., Lin, S. J., & Tan, H. K. (2005). Designing safe drug names. Drug Safety, 28, 495–512.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273–281.CrossRefPubMed Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273–281.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Lethbridge, A., Hinton, M., & Nimmo, L. M. (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1019–1034.PubMed Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Lethbridge, A., Hinton, M., & Nimmo, L. M. (2002). Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1019–1034.PubMed
go back to reference Soloman, R. L., & Postman, L. (1952). Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 195–201.CrossRef Soloman, R. L., & Postman, L. (1952). Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 195–201.CrossRef
go back to reference Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135–138.CrossRefPubMed Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20, 135–138.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Storkel, H. L. (2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201–221.CrossRef Storkel, H. L. (2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2011). The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 38, 628–643.CrossRefPubMed Storkel, H. L., & Hoover, J. R. (2011). The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 38, 628–643.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 191–211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 191–211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735–747. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735–747.
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 514–529. Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 514–529.
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.CrossRef Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.CrossRef
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374–408.CrossRef Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481–487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481–487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 193–204.CrossRef Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 193–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Charles-Luce, J., & Kemmerer, D. (1997). Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech, 40, 47–62.CrossRefPubMed Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Charles-Luce, J., & Kemmerer, D. (1997). Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech, 40, 47–62.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306–311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306–311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Vitevitch, M. S., & Rodríguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 64–73.CrossRef Vitevitch, M. S., & Rodríguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 64–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2008). Measuring the crowd within: Probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science, 19, 645–647.CrossRefPubMed Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2008). Measuring the crowd within: Probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science, 19, 645–647.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Phonotactic probability of brand names: I’d buy that!
Auteurs
Michael S. Vitevitch
Alexander J. Donoso
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0374-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2012

Psychological Research 6/2012 Naar de uitgave