Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 6/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Paper

Parent Involvement in Rural Elementary Schools in New Zealand: A Survey

Auteurs: Garry Hornby, Chrystal Witte

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 6/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We surveyed rural elementary schools in New Zealand regarding their practice of parent involvement (PI). Interviews were conducted at 22 schools using a schedule which focused on eleven aspects of PI: policy formation, acting as a resource, collaborating with teachers, sharing information on children, channels of communication, liaison with school staff, parent education, parent support, encouraging parents into school, involving diverse parents, and professional development for teachers. Analysis of data from the interviews identified several common weaknesses in PI provision: a lack of written school policies on PI; the ad hoc nature of the organization of PI; minimal parent education organized by schools; minimal focus on parent support; minimal use of home visits; limited ideas to involve diverse parents; a minimal focus on involving parents of children with special needs; and, limited professional development for teachers on working with parents. Implications for improving the practice of PI in rural elementary schools are discussed.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bauch, P. A. (2001). School-community partnerships in rural schools: Leadership, renewal, and a sense of place. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 204–221.CrossRef Bauch, P. A. (2001). School-community partnerships in rural schools: Leadership, renewal, and a sense of place. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 204–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Biddulph, F., Biddulph, J., & Biddulph, C. (2003). The complexity of community and family influences on children’s achievement in New Zealand: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Biddulph, F., Biddulph, J., & Biddulph, C. (2003). The complexity of community and family influences on children’s achievement in New Zealand: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
go back to reference Bull, A., Brooking, K., & Campbell, R. (2008). Successful home-school partnerships: Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Wellington: MoE. Bull, A., Brooking, K., & Campbell, R. (2008). Successful home-school partnerships: Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Wellington: MoE.
go back to reference Cox, D. D. (2005). Evidence-based interventions using home-school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 473–497.CrossRef Cox, D. D. (2005). Evidence-based interventions using home-school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 473–497.CrossRef
go back to reference Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: Research Report 433. London: Department for Education and Skills. Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: Research Report 433. London: Department for Education and Skills.
go back to reference Education Review Office. (2008). Partners in learning: Schools’ engagement with parents, whanau and communities. Wellington: Author. Education Review Office. (2008). Partners in learning: Schools’ engagement with parents, whanau and communities. Wellington: Author.
go back to reference Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
go back to reference Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (2004). Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 12–18. Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (2004). Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 12–18.
go back to reference Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parent involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.CrossRef Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parent involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Flanigan, C. B. (2007). Preparing pre-service teachers to partner with parents and communities: An analysis of college of education faculty focus groups. School Community Journal, 17, 89–109. Flanigan, C. B. (2007). Preparing pre-service teachers to partner with parents and communities: An analysis of college of education faculty focus groups. School Community Journal, 17, 89–109.
go back to reference Grant, K. B., & Ray, J. A. (2010). Home, school and community collaboration: Culturally responsive family involvement. Los Angeles: Sage. Grant, K. B., & Ray, J. A. (2010). Home, school and community collaboration: Culturally responsive family involvement. Los Angeles: Sage.
go back to reference Greenwood, G. E., & Hickman, C. W. (1991). Research and practice in parent involvement: Implications for teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 91, 279–288.CrossRef Greenwood, G. E., & Hickman, C. W. (1991). Research and practice in parent involvement: Implications for teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 91, 279–288.CrossRef
go back to reference Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
go back to reference Henderson, A. T., Mapp, K. L., Johnson, V. R., & Davies, D. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family-school partnerships. New York: New Press. Henderson, A. T., Mapp, K. L., Johnson, V. R., & Davies, D. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family-school partnerships. New York: New Press.
go back to reference Herzog, M. J. R., & Pittman, R. B. (1995). Home, family and community: Ingredients in the rural education equation. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 113–118. Herzog, M. J. R., & Pittman, R. B. (1995). Home, family and community: Ingredients in the rural education equation. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 113–118.
go back to reference Hornby, G. (2000). Improving parental involvement. London: Cassell. Hornby, G. (2000). Improving parental involvement. London: Cassell.
go back to reference Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 202–218.CrossRef Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 202–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269.CrossRef Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269.CrossRef
go back to reference MoE. (2005). The schooling strategy 2005–2010. Wellington: Ministry of Education. MoE. (2005). The schooling strategy 2005–2010. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
go back to reference Osborne, S., & deOnis, A. (1997). Parent involvement in rural schools: Implications for educators. Rural Educator, 19(2), 20–25, 29. Osborne, S., & deOnis, A. (1997). Parent involvement in rural schools: Implications for educators. Rural Educator, 19(2), 20–25, 29.
go back to reference Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410.CrossRef Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410.CrossRef
go back to reference Seligman, M., & Darling, R. (2007). Ordinary families: Special children: A systems approach to childhood disability (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford. Seligman, M., & Darling, R. (2007). Ordinary families: Special children: A systems approach to childhood disability (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Metagegevens
Titel
Parent Involvement in Rural Elementary Schools in New Zealand: A Survey
Auteurs
Garry Hornby
Chrystal Witte
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9368-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2010

Journal of Child and Family Studies 6/2010 Naar de uitgave