Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2004

01-08-2004 | Original Article

Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli

Auteurs: Stefanie Richter, Petra Jansen-Osmann, Jürgen Konczak, Karl-Theodor Kalveram

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2004

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

When humans are exposed to external forces while performing arm movements, they adapt by compensating for these novel forces. The basis of this learning process is thought to be a neural representation that models the relation between all forces acting upon the system and the kinematic effects they produce, called inverse dynamic model (IDM). The present study investigated whether and how the predictability of a given external force affects the selection of an appropriate motor response to compensate for such force. Adult human subjects (N=32) held a handle that could rotate around the elbow joint and learned to perform goal-directed forearm flexion movements, while an external velocity-dependent negative damping force was applied that assisted forearm movement. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. In the associative group, the applied damping force was always associated with a specific initial position. Thus, after initial learning, the force application became predictable. In the non-associative group, where the same movements were performed, the applied force was independent of the initial position, so that no association between force and location could be formed. We found that only the associative group significantly reduced target error when damping was present. That is, the location cue aided these subjects in generating dynamic responses in the appropriate limb. Our results indicate that motor adaptation to different dynamic environments can be facilitated by indicative stimuli.
Literatuur
go back to reference Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1997). The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 554–560.PubMed Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1997). The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 554–560.PubMed
go back to reference Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Bizzi, E. (1996). Motor learning by field approximation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 3843–3846.CrossRef Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Bizzi, E. (1996). Motor learning by field approximation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 3843–3846.CrossRef
go back to reference Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Sciences, 16, 307–354. Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Sciences, 16, 307–354.
go back to reference Kalveram, K. T. (1991). Pattern generating and reflex-like processes controlling aiming movements in the presence of inertia, damping and gravity. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 413–419.PubMed Kalveram, K. T. (1991). Pattern generating and reflex-like processes controlling aiming movements in the presence of inertia, damping and gravity. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 413–419.PubMed
go back to reference Kalveram, K. T. (1998). Wie das Individuum mit seiner Umwelt interagiert. Lengerich, Germany: Papst. Kalveram, K. T. (1998). Wie das Individuum mit seiner Umwelt interagiert. Lengerich, Germany: Papst.
go back to reference Kalveram, K. T. (2000). Sensorimotor sequential learning by a neural network based on redefined Hebbian Learning. In Malmgren, H., Borga, M., & Niklasson, L. (Eds). Artificial Neural Networks in Medicine and Biology (pp. 271–276). London: Springer. Kalveram, K. T. (2000). Sensorimotor sequential learning by a neural network based on redefined Hebbian Learning. In Malmgren, H., Borga, M., & Niklasson, L. (Eds). Artificial Neural Networks in Medicine and Biology (pp. 271–276). London: Springer.
go back to reference Karniel, A., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2002). Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Experimental Brain Research, 143, 520–524.CrossRef Karniel, A., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2002). Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Experimental Brain Research, 143, 520–524.CrossRef
go back to reference Konczak, J., Jansen-Osmann, P., & Kalveram, K. T. (2003). The development of force adaptation during childhood. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 41–52.PubMed Konczak, J., Jansen-Osmann, P., & Kalveram, K. T. (2003). The development of force adaptation during childhood. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 41–52.PubMed
go back to reference Rao, A. K., & Shadmehr, R. (2001). Contextual cues facilitate learning of multiple models of arm dynamics. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 302, 4. Rao, A. K., & Shadmehr, R. (2001). Contextual cues facilitate learning of multiple models of arm dynamics. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 302, 4.
go back to reference Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1997). Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science, 277, 821–825.PubMed Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1997). Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science, 277, 821–825.PubMed
go back to reference Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1999). Inhibitory control of competing motor memories. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 235–251.CrossRef Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1999). Inhibitory control of competing motor memories. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 235–251.CrossRef
go back to reference Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3208–3224.PubMed Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3208–3224.PubMed
go back to reference Vetter, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Context estimation for sensorimotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1026–1034.PubMed Vetter, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Context estimation for sensorimotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1026–1034.PubMed
go back to reference Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317–1329.CrossRef Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317–1329.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–1882.PubMed Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–1882.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli
Auteurs
Stefanie Richter
Petra Jansen-Osmann
Jürgen Konczak
Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2004
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0140-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2004

Psychological Research 4/2004 Naar de uitgave