Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2014

01-12-2014 | Review

Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review

Auteurs: Linda Rainey, Ruth van Nispen, Carlijn van der Zee, Ger van Rens

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To critically appraise the measurement properties of questionnaires measuring participation in children and adolescents (0–18 years) with a disability.

Methods

Bibliographic databases were searched for studies evaluating the measurement properties of self-report or parent-report questionnaires measuring participation in children and adolescents (0–18 years) with a disability. The methodological quality of the included studies and the results of the measurement properties were evaluated using a checklist developed on consensus-based standards.

Results

The search strategy identified 3,977 unique publications, of which 22 were selected; these articles evaluated the development and measurement properties of eight different questionnaires. The Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation was evaluated most extensively, generally showing moderate positive results on content validity, internal consistency, reliability and construct validity. The remaining questionnaires also demonstrated positive results. However, at least 50 % of the measurement properties per questionnaire were not (or only poorly) assessed.

Conclusions

Studies of high methodological quality, using modern statistical methods, are needed to accurately assess the measurement properties of currently available questionnaires. Moreover, consensus is required on the definition of the construct ‘participation’ to determine content validity and to enable meaningful interpretation of outcomes.
vorige artikel Measurement properties of rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: systematic review of the literature
volgende artikel Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Petrenchik, T. M., & King, G. A. (2011). Pathways to positive development: Childhood participation in everyday places and activities. In S. Bazyk (Ed.), Mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention in children and youth: A guiding framework for occupational therapy (pp. 71–94). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
2.
McManus, V., Corcoran, P., & Perry, I. J. (2008). Participation in everyday activities and quality of life in pre-teenage children living with cerebral palsy in south west Ireland. BMC Pediatrics, 8(50), 1–10.
3.
Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640–649.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Simpkins, S. D., Ripke, M., Huston, A. C., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Predicting participation and outcomes in out-of-school activities: Similarities and differences across social ecologies. New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 51–69.PubMedCrossRef
5.
King, G., Law, M., King, S., Rosenbaum, P., Kertoy, M. K., & Young, N. L. (2003). A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23, 63–90.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Coster, W., & Khetani, M. A. (2008). Measuring participation of children with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 639–648.PubMedCrossRef
7.
WHO. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health for children and youth (ICF-CY). Geneva: World Health Organization.
8.
Whiteneck, G., & Dijkers, M. P. (2009). Difficult to measure constructs: Conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(supplement), 1.
9.
Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 983–997.PubMedCrossRef
10.
McConachie, H., Colver, A. F., Forsyth, R. J., Jarvis, S. N., & Parkinson, K. N. (2006). Participation of disabled children: How should it be characterised and measured? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1157–1164.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Colver, A. (2005). A shared framework and language for childhood disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 780–784.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Hemmingsson, H., & Jonsson, H. (2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health—Some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 569–576.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Ueda, S., & Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 596–601.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Forsyth, R., & Jarvis, S. (2002). Participation in childhood. Child: Care, Health and Development, 28, 277–279.
15.
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. (2003). New wine in old bottles: The WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 349–354.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Morris, C., Kurinczuk, J. J., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Child or family assessed measures of activity performance and participation for children with cerebral palsy: A structured review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31, 397–407.
17.
Sakzewski, L., Boyd, R., & Ziviani, J. (2007). Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 232–240.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ziviani, J., Desha, L., Feeney, R., & Boyd, R. (2010). Measures of participation outcomes and environmental considerations for children with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Impairment, 11, 93–112.CrossRef
19.
Phillips, R. L., Olds, T., Boshoff, K., & Lane, A. E. (2013). Measuring activity and participation in children and adolescents with disabilities: A literature review of available instruments. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60, 288–300.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205.CrossRef
21.
Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendivil, J., Garin, O., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., et al. (2008). Development of EMPRO: A tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health, 11, 700–708.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(2), S15–S20.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., et al. (2009). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1–8.
24.
Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1115–1123.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Gibbons, E., et al. (2010). Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments) checklist. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1–11.CrossRef
27.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 737–745.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Law, M., King, G., Petrenchik, T., Kertoy, M., & Anaby, D. (2012). The Assessment of Preschool Children’s Participation: internal consistency and construct validity. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 32, 272–287.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Chen, C., Chen, C., Shen, I., Liu, I., Kang, L., & Wu, C. (2013). Clinimetric properties of the Assessment of Preschool Children’s Participation in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1528–1535.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Bult, M. K., Verschuren, O., Kertoy, M. K., Lindeman, E., Jongmans, M. J., & Ketelaar, M. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the dutch version of the Assessment of Preschool Children’s Participation (APCP): Construct validity and test–retest reliability. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 33, 372–383. PubMedCrossRef
32.
Anastasiadi, I., & Tzetzis, G. (2013). Construct validation of the children’s assessment participation and enjoyment (CAPE) and preferences for activities for children (PAC). Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 10, 523–532.PubMed
33.
Ullenhag, A., Almqvist, L., Granlund, M., & Krumlinde-Sundholm, L. (2012). Cultural validity of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment/preferences for activities of children (CAPE/PAC). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19, 428–438.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Nordtorp, H. L., Nyquist, A., Jahnsen, R., Moser, T., & Strand, L. I. (2013). Reliability of the Norwegian version of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and preferences for activities of children (PAC). Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 33, 199–212. PubMedCrossRef
35.
Colon, W. I., Rodriguez, C., Ito, M., & Reed, C. N. (2008). Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and preferences for activities of children. Occupational Therapy International, 15, 100–113.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Longo, E., Badia, M., Orgaz, B., & Verdugo, M. A. (2014). Cross-cultural validation of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) in Spain. Child: Care, Health And Development, 40, 231–241.
37.
Bult, M. K., Verschuren, O., Gorter, J. W., Jongmans, M. J., Piskur, B., & Ketelaar, M. (2010). Cross- cultural validation and psychometric evaluation of the Dutch language version of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) in children with and without physical disabilities. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24, 843–853.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Potvin, M. C., Snider, L., Prelock, P., Kehayia, E., & Wood-Dauphinee, S. (2013). Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment/preferences for activities of children: Psychometric properties in a population with high-functioning autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 209–217.PubMedCrossRef
39.
King, G. A., Law, M., King, S., et al. (2006). Measuring children’s participation in recreation and leisure activities: Construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33, 28–39.
40.
King, G., Law, M., King, S., Hurley, P., Rosenbaum, P., Hanna, S., et al. (2004). Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and preferences for activities of children. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
41.
Hwang, A., Liou, T., Bedell, G., et al. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation—Traditional Chinese version. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 36, 211–220.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Bedell, G. (2009). Further validation of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP). Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12, 342–351.PubMedCrossRef
43.
McDougall, J., Bedell, G., & Wright, V. (2013). The youth report version of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP): Assessment of psychometric properties and comparison with parent report. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 512–522.
44.
Bedell, G. (2004). Developing a follow-up survey focused on participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 191–205.PubMed
45.
Rosenberg, L., Jarus, T., & Bart, O. (2010). Development and initial validation of the children’s participation questionnaire (CPQ). Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 1633–1644.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Lepage, C., Noreau, L., Bernard, P., & Fougeyrollas, P. (1998). Profile of handicap situations in children with cerebral palsy. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 30, 263–272.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S. A., & St-Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 127–141.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Noreau, L., Lepage, C., & Boissiere, L. (2007). Measuring participation in children with disabilities using the Assessment of Life Habits. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 666–671.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Kemps, R. J. J. K., Siebes, R. C., Gorter, J. W., Ketelaar, M., & Jongmans, M. J. (2011). Parental perceptions of participation of preschool children with and without mobility limitations: Validity and reliability of the PART. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 1421–1432.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Coster, W., Law, M., Bedell, G., Khetani, M., Cousins, M., & Teplicky, R. (2012). Development of the participation and environment measure for children and youth: conceptual basis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 238–246.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Coster, W., Bedell, G., Law, M., et al. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(11), 1030–1037.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Tuffrey, C., Bateman, B. J., & Colver, A. C. (2013). The Questionnaire of Young People’s Participation (QYPP): A new measure of participation frequency for disabled young people. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 500–511.
53.
Dunn, L. (2004). Validation of the CHORES: A measure of school-aged children’s participation in household tasks. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11, 179–190.CrossRef
54.
Washington, L. A., Wilson, S., Engel, J. M., & Jensen, M. P. (2007). Development and preliminary evaluation of a pediatric measure of community integration: The Pediatric Community Participation Questionnaire (PCPQ). Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 241–245.CrossRef
55.
Merkies, I. S. J., Schmitz, P. I. M., van der Meché, F. G. A., Samijn, J. P. A., & van Doorn, P. A. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of a new handicap scale in immune-mediated polyneuropathies. Muscle and Nerve, 25, 370–377.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Angst, F. (2011). The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 1–6.CrossRef
57.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58.
Edwards, M. C. (2009). An introduction to item response theory using the need for cognition scale. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 507–529.CrossRef
59.
Pesudovs, K. (2006). Patient-centered measurement in ophthalmology: a paradigm shift. BMC Ophthalmology, 6, 1–4.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review
Auteurs
Linda Rainey
Ruth van Nispen
Carlijn van der Zee
Ger van Rens
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0743-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2014

Quality of Life Research 10/2014 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Health status profiles in community-dwelling elderly using self-reported health indicators: a latent class analysis

OriginalPaper

Factors associated with quality of life measured by EQ-5D in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease

OriginalPaper

Measurement properties of rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: systematic review of the literature

OriginalPaper

Physical activity and health-related quality of life: US adults with and without limitations

OriginalPaper

Cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients: factor mixture models with continuous non-normal distributions

OriginalPaper

Discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool: a cross-sectional survey of 251 cancer survivors