Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The objectives of this study were to investigate the psychometric properties of the SF-36 in a sample of older adults with chronic conditions and to test whether measurement bias exists based on the levels of comorbidity.
Participants included were 979 cognitively intact older adults with comorbidities who were interviewed at their homes. We examined the psychometric properties of the SF-36 and conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to investigate the assumption of measurement invariance by the levels of comorbidity.
Overall data quality was high and scaling assumptions were generally met with few exceptions. Floor and ceiling effects were present for the role-physical and role-emotional subscales. Using CFA, we found that a three-factor measurement model fits the data well. We identified two violations of measurement invariance. Results showed that participants with high comorbidity level place more emphasis on social functioning (SF) and bodily pain (BP) in relation to physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than those with low comorbidity level.
Measurement bias was present for the SF and BP components of the SF-36 physical HRQoL measure. Researchers should be cautious when considering the use of SF-36 in clinical studies among older adults with comorbidities.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Rothrock, N. E., Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K., et al. (2010). Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1195–1204. PubMedCrossRef
Hill, S., Harries, U., & Popay, J. (1996). Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 50, 94–98. PubMedCrossRef
Reuben, D. B., Valle, L. A., Hays, R. D., et al. (1995). Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: A comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43, 17–23. PubMed
Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Mehr, D. R., et al. (1994). MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. The Journal of Gerontology, 49, M174–M182. CrossRef
Cureton, E. E. (1966). Corrected item-test correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 93–96. CrossRef
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. CrossRef
Keller, S. D., Ware, J. E., Jr, Bentler, P. M., et al. (1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–1188. PubMedCrossRef
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. CrossRef
Millsap, R. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge.
Holms, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
Ware, J., & Kosinski, M. (2001). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A manual for users of version 1 (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.
Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Kosinski, M., et al. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care. Health Care Financing Review, 25, 5–25. PubMed
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc.
Banks, P., Martin, C. R., & Petty, R. K. (2012). The factor structure of the SF-36 in adults with progressive neuromuscular disorders. Journal of Evaluation Clinical Practice, 18, 32–36. CrossRef
- Measurement bias of the SF-36 Health Survey in older adults with chronic conditions
Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis
- Springer Netherlands