Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 3/2021

02-01-2021 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Investigating Psychometric Properties of the Self-Compassion Scale Using Rasch Methodology

Auteurs: Kalolaine P. Finaulahi, Alexander Sumich, Nadja Heym, Oleg N. Medvedev

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 3/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objectives

The 26-item Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and its short 12-item version (SCS-SF) were reported to have acceptable psychometric properties, and both scales are widely used to assess self-compassion in individuals. However, recent investigations were inconsistent regarding factor structure of the SCS, and psychometric properties of the scale were not tested for consistency with principles of fundamental measurement using appropriate methodology such as Rasch analysis.

Methods

A partial credit Rasch model was used to evaluate psychometric properties of the SCS and SCS-SF with the sample of 743 respondents randomly divided into two equal subsamples (A and B) to replicate the results for the purpose of robustness.

Results

Initially, there were no misfitting items but the local dependency between various items affected Rasch model fit. This issue was resolved by combining locally dependent items into four super-items resulting in the best fit to the Rasch model of both SCS and SCS-SF, with evidence of unidimensionality and an excellent sample targeting. Although both scale versions had strong reliability satisfactory for individual and group assessment, the original SCS demonstrated superior psychometric properties reflected by higher reliability indicated by Person Separation Index (PSI) of 0.90 compared to the SCS-SF (PSI = 0.85). These analyses were replicated with the sample B for both scale versions, resulting in equally good fit. This permitted generating ordinal-to-interval conversion tables based on Rasch model estimates.

Conclusions

The current study supported the reliability and internal validity of both the SCS and SCS-SF. Accuracy of these assessment instruments can be further improved by using the ordinal-to-interval conversion tables published here.
Literatuur
go back to reference Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573.CrossRef Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573.CrossRef
go back to reference Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030 (beta version for Windows). Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030 (beta version for Windows). Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd.
go back to reference Apodaca, P., & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: Integration of uni- and multidimensional models. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 723–748.CrossRef Apodaca, P., & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: Integration of uni- and multidimensional models. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 723–748.CrossRef
go back to reference Balalla, S. K., Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2019). Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and shorter versions using Rasch analysis in traumatic brain injury and orthopedic populations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(10), 1853–1862.CrossRef Balalla, S. K., Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2019). Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and shorter versions using Rasch analysis in traumatic brain injury and orthopedic populations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(10), 1853–1862.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q. 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.CrossRef Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q. 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2016). Validation of the psychometric properties of the Self-Compassion Scale. Testing the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 23(5), 460–468.CrossRef Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2016). Validation of the psychometric properties of the Self-Compassion Scale. Testing the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 23(5), 460–468.CrossRef
go back to reference Cox, B. J., Parker, J. D. A., & Swinson, R. P. (1996). Anxiety sensitivity: Confirmatory evidence for a multidimensional construct. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(7), 591–598.CrossRef Cox, B. J., Parker, J. D. A., & Swinson, R. P. (1996). Anxiety sensitivity: Confirmatory evidence for a multidimensional construct. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(7), 591–598.CrossRef
go back to reference Durkin, M., Beaumont, E., Martin, C. J. H., & Carson, J. (2016). A pilot study exploring the relationship between self-compassion, self-judgement, self-kindness, compassion, professional quality of life and wellbeing among UK community nurses. Nurse Education Today, 46, 109–114.CrossRef Durkin, M., Beaumont, E., Martin, C. J. H., & Carson, J. (2016). A pilot study exploring the relationship between self-compassion, self-judgement, self-kindness, compassion, professional quality of life and wellbeing among UK community nurses. Nurse Education Today, 46, 109–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Fisher, W. P. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238. Fisher, W. P. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238.
go back to reference Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, M., & Rivis, A. (2011). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(3), 239–255.CrossRef Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, M., & Rivis, A. (2011). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(3), 239–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Hagell, P., & Westergren, A. (2016). Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the Rasch model according to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (RUMM) Program in health outcome measurement. Journal of Applied Measurement, 17(4), 416–431.PubMed Hagell, P., & Westergren, A. (2016). Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the Rasch model according to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (RUMM) Program in health outcome measurement. Journal of Applied Measurement, 17(4), 416–431.PubMed
go back to reference Heym, N., Heasman, B. C., Hunter, K., Blanco, S. R., Wang, G. Y., Siegert, R., Cleare, A., Gibson, G. R., Kumari, V., & Sumich, A. L. (2019). The role of microbiota and inflammation in self-judgement and empathy: Implications for understanding the brain-gut-microbiome axis in depression. Psychopharmacology, 236(5), 1459–1470.CrossRef Heym, N., Heasman, B. C., Hunter, K., Blanco, S. R., Wang, G. Y., Siegert, R., Cleare, A., Gibson, G. R., Kumari, V., & Sumich, A. L. (2019). The role of microbiota and inflammation in self-judgement and empathy: Implications for understanding the brain-gut-microbiome axis in depression. Psychopharmacology, 236(5), 1459–1470.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumlander, S., Lahtinen, O., Turunen, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Two is more valid than one, but is six even better? The factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). PLoS One, 13(12), e0207706.CrossRef Kumlander, S., Lahtinen, O., Turunen, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). Two is more valid than one, but is six even better? The factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). PLoS One, 13(12), e0207706.CrossRef
go back to reference Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., Shapiro, S., Carmody, J., Abbey, S., & Devins, G. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467.CrossRef Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., Shapiro, S., Carmody, J., Abbey, S., & Devins, G. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467.CrossRef
go back to reference Leung, Y.-Y., Png, M.-E., Conaghan, P., & Tennant, A. (2013). A systematic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease—A special interest group report of OMERACT 11. The Journal of Rheumatology, 41(1), 159–164.CrossRef Leung, Y.-Y., Png, M.-E., Conaghan, P., & Tennant, A. (2013). A systematic literature review on the application of Rasch analysis in musculoskeletal disease—A special interest group report of OMERACT 11. The Journal of Rheumatology, 41(1), 159–164.CrossRef
go back to reference López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015). A reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s total score: Self-compassion versus self-criticism. PLoS One, 10(7), e0132940.CrossRef López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015). A reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s total score: Self-compassion versus self-criticism. PLoS One, 10(7), e0132940.CrossRef
go back to reference Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., & Tennant, A. (2011). Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) revisited. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(10), 884–892.CrossRef Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., & Tennant, A. (2011). Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) revisited. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(10), 884–892.CrossRef
go back to reference Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Ahlborg, G., & Tennant, A. (2013). Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: a Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 2.CrossRef Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Ahlborg, G., & Tennant, A. (2013). Construct validity of the psychological general well being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: a Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 2.CrossRef
go back to reference Marais, I., & Andrich, D. (2008). Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of response dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(2), 105–124.PubMed Marais, I., & Andrich, D. (2008). Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of response dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(2), 105–124.PubMed
go back to reference Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.CrossRef Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Kersten, P., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2017a). Improving the precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using a Rasch approach. Mindfulness, 8(4), 995–1008.CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Kersten, P., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2017a). Improving the precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using a Rasch approach. Mindfulness, 8(4), 995–1008.CrossRef
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Mohamed, A. D., Shepherd, D., Landhuis, E., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2017b). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: Transformation from an ordinal to an interval measure using Rasch analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(5), 1425–1443.CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Mohamed, A. D., Shepherd, D., Landhuis, E., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2017b). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: Transformation from an ordinal to an interval measure using Rasch analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(5), 1425–1443.CrossRef
go back to reference Medvedev, O. N., Turner-Stokes, L., Ashford, S., & Siegert, R. J. (2018). Rasch analysis of the UK Functional Assessment Measure in patients with complex disability after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(5), 420–428.CrossRef Medvedev, O. N., Turner-Stokes, L., Ashford, S., & Siegert, R. J. (2018). Rasch analysis of the UK Functional Assessment Measure in patients with complex disability after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(5), 420–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell-Parker, K., Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., & Siegert, R. J. (2018). Rasch analysis of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(3), 258–268.CrossRef Mitchell-Parker, K., Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., & Siegert, R. J. (2018). Rasch analysis of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(3), 258–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Neff, K. D. (2003a). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250.CrossRef Neff, K. D. (2003a). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Neff, K. (2003b). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.CrossRef Neff, K. (2003b). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Neff, K. D. (2016). The Self-Compassion Scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274.CrossRef Neff, K. D. (2016). The Self-Compassion Scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274.CrossRef
go back to reference Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L. M., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., Guo, H. X., Hirsch, J. K., Hupfeld, J., Hutz, C. S., & Kotsou, I. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 27.CrossRef Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L. M., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., Guo, H. X., Hirsch, J. K., Hupfeld, J., Hutz, C. S., & Kotsou, I. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 27.CrossRef
go back to reference Nijsten, T., Unaeze, J., & Stern, R. S. (2006). Refinement and reduction of the Impact of Psoriasis Questionnaire: Classical test theory vs. Rasch analysis. British Journal of Dermatology, 154(4), 692–700.CrossRef Nijsten, T., Unaeze, J., & Stern, R. S. (2006). Refinement and reduction of the Impact of Psoriasis Questionnaire: Classical test theory vs. Rasch analysis. British Journal of Dermatology, 154(4), 692–700.CrossRef
go back to reference Norquist, J. M., Fitzpatrick, R., Dawson, J., & Jenkinson, C. (2004). Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Medical Care, 42(1 Suppl), I25–I36. Norquist, J. M., Fitzpatrick, R., Dawson, J., & Jenkinson, C. (2004). Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Medical Care, 42(1 Suppl), I25–I36.
go back to reference Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2019). Interpersonal mindfulness: Scale development and initial construct validation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1044–1061.CrossRef Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2019). Interpersonal mindfulness: Scale development and initial construct validation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1044–1061.CrossRef
go back to reference Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250–255.CrossRef Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Denmark, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Denmark, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
go back to reference Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Compare, A., Zangeneh, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Buddhist-derived loving-kindness and compassion meditation for the treatment of psychopathology: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1161–1180.CrossRef Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Compare, A., Zangeneh, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Buddhist-derived loving-kindness and compassion meditation for the treatment of psychopathology: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1161–1180.CrossRef
go back to reference Shrestha, A. K. (2016). Positive psychology: Evolution, philosophical foundations, and present growth. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 460. Shrestha, A. K. (2016). Positive psychology: Evolution, philosophical foundations, and present growth. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 460.
go back to reference Sinclair, S., Kondejewski, J., Raffin-Bouchal, S., King-Shier, K. M., & Singh, P. (2017). Can self-compassion promote healthcare provider well-being and compassionate care to others? Results of a systematic review. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9(2), 168–206. Sinclair, S., Kondejewski, J., Raffin-Bouchal, S., King-Shier, K. M., & Singh, P. (2017). Can self-compassion promote healthcare provider well-being and compassionate care to others? Results of a systematic review. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9(2), 168–206.
go back to reference Smith Jr., E. V. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(2), 205-231. Smith Jr., E. V. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(2), 205-231.
go back to reference Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358–1362.CrossRef Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358–1362.CrossRef
go back to reference Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters! (A tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20(1), 1048–1051. Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters! (A tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20(1), 1048–1051.
go back to reference Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26(3), 249.CrossRef Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26(3), 249.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, M. (2004). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach (1st ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRef Wilson, M. (2004). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach (1st ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. San Diego: Mesa Press. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. San Diego: Mesa Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Investigating Psychometric Properties of the Self-Compassion Scale Using Rasch Methodology
Auteurs
Kalolaine P. Finaulahi
Alexander Sumich
Nadja Heym
Oleg N. Medvedev
Publicatiedatum
02-01-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01539-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2021

Mindfulness 3/2021 Naar de uitgave

ORTHOGONAL ROTATION IN CONSCIOUSNESS

Meditation Is Not What you Think