Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology 1/2021

05-01-2021

Intersectionality Research in Psychological Science: Resisting the Tendency to Disconnect, Dilute, and Depoliticize

Auteurs: NiCole T. Buchanan, Lauren O. Wiklund

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 1/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Psychological science has been slow to incorporate intersectionality as a concept and as a framework for conducting research. This limits not only the potential for intersectionality theory, but also limits the potential impact of the research claiming to use it. Mennies and colleagues conducted a study of psychopathology and treatment utilization using a large racially diverse sample of youth and frame their work as intersectional because they compare across three social categories (race, sex, and social class) and consider social issues that may impact the groups studied. We argue that while this represents a preliminary step, it does not represent intersectionality theory and praxis. In this article we review intersectional theory and praxis, examine psychological science and its resistance to fully incorporating intersectionality, and highlight how research must shift to be truly intersectional. Finally, we issue a call to the field to integrate intersectionality theory and praxis and to resist the tendency to dilute and depoliticize intersectionality theory and disconnect from its social justice frame.
Voetnoten
1
The term redlining refers to the color that banks and financial lenders coded predominantly Black neighborhoods as least desirable when conducting appraisals for community development. This institutionalized practice translated into denying Black individuals mortgage loans or only lending predatory and sub-par loans as a way of systemically segregating neighborhoods in relations to resources (Mendez, 2014).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Brooks, V. R. (1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington Books. Brooks, V. R. (1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington Books.
go back to reference Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
go back to reference Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Polity Press. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
go back to reference Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
go back to reference Mennies, R. J., Birk, S. L., Norris, L. A., & Olino, T. M. (2020). The Main and Interactive Associations between Demographic Factors and Psychopathology and Treatment Utilization in Youth: A Test of Intersectionality in the ABCD Study Mennies, R. J., Birk, S. L., Norris, L. A., & Olino, T. M. (2020). The Main and Interactive Associations between Demographic Factors and Psychopathology and Treatment Utilization in Youth: A Test of Intersectionality in the ABCD Study
go back to reference Settles, I. H., Warner, L., Buchanan, N. T., & Jones, M. K. (2020). Understanding Psychology’s Resistance to Intersectionality Theory using a Framework of Invisibility and Epistemic Exclusion. Journal of Social Issues. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josi.12403. Settles, I. H., Warner, L., Buchanan, N. T., & Jones, M. K. (2020). Understanding Psychology’s Resistance to Intersectionality Theory using a Framework of Invisibility and Epistemic Exclusion. Journal of Social Issues. Advance online publication. https://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​josi.​12403.
Metagegevens
Titel
Intersectionality Research in Psychological Science: Resisting the Tendency to Disconnect, Dilute, and Depoliticize
Auteurs
NiCole T. Buchanan
Lauren O. Wiklund
Publicatiedatum
05-01-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00748-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology 1/2021 Naar de uitgave