Ga naar de hoofdinhoud
Top

Intersectionality does not equal intersectional stigma: reply to Lett (2022)

  • 12-11-2022
  • Letter to Editor
Gepubliceerd in:
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Extract

We appreciate the opportunity to reply to Lett’s (2022) passionate letter on our approach to measuring intersectional stigma (Kalichman et al., 2022a, 2022b). Unfortunately, Lett fundamentally misunderstood the conceptualization of our scale development. Lett misinterpreted our research as being grounded in intersectionality, perhaps because of the imprecision and ambiguity of the term intersectionality itself (Davis, 2008). Although we acknowledge the rich tradition of the Black feminist framework of intersectionality and we understand that there is a significant amount of phenomenological work on intersectionality in social justice movements, our aim is not to test or articulate theories and philosophies of intersectionality. While the notion of intersectionality has influenced our thinking, intersectional stigma and intersectionality are not the same. Our research is actually grounded in theories of stigma (Goffman, 1963), particularly contemporary frameworks of HIV stigma (Earnshaw & Chaudoir, 2009; Earnshaw & Kalichman, 2013; Turan et al., 2017, 2019). …
Titel
Intersectionality does not equal intersectional stigma: reply to Lett (2022)
Auteur
Seth C. Kalichman
Publicatiedatum
12-11-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00376-5
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.