Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2012

01-11-2012 | Commentary

Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6

Auteur: Cameron N. McIntosh

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This article is a brief commentary in response to “Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, doi:10.​1007/​s11136-011-0082-6.” The commentary argues that approximate goodness-of-fit indexes cannot be used to salvage confirmatory factor models rejected by the Chi-square test of exact fit. Instead, rigorous diagnostic procedures should be used to identify and resolve the particular sources of model misspecification.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Gundy, C. M., Fayers, P. M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N. W., Sprangers, M. A. J., Velikov, G., & Aaronson, N. K. (2011). Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6. Gundy, C. M., Fayers, P. M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N. W., Sprangers, M. A. J., Velikov, G., & Aaronson, N. K. (2011). Comparing higher order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-011-0082-6.
2.
go back to reference Hayduk, L. A., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! one, two, three testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841–850.CrossRef Hayduk, L. A., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! one, two, three testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841–850.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824.CrossRef Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McIntosh, C. N. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–867.CrossRef McIntosh, C. N. (2007). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 859–867.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
6.
go back to reference Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 561–582.CrossRef Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 561–582.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cox, D. R., & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate dependencies: Models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman & Hall. Cox, D. R., & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate dependencies: Models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman & Hall.
8.
go back to reference Barker, S. F. (1989). The elements of logic (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Barker, S. F. (1989). The elements of logic (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
go back to reference Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 557–595.CrossRef Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 557–595.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sörbom, D. (2001). Karl Jöreskog and LISREL: A personal story. In R. Cudeck, K. G. Jöreskog, S. H. C. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future: A festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog (pp. 1–10). Lincolnville, NE: Scientific Software International. Sörbom, D. (2001). Karl Jöreskog and LISREL: A personal story. In R. Cudeck, K. G. Jöreskog, S. H. C. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future: A festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog (pp. 1–10). Lincolnville, NE: Scientific Software International.
11.
go back to reference Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 737–757.CrossRef Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 737–757.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hancock, G. R. (1999). A sequential Scheffé-type respecification procedure for controlling Type I error in exploratory structural equation model modification. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(2), 158–168.CrossRef Hancock, G. R. (1999). A sequential Scheffé-type respecification procedure for controlling Type I error in exploratory structural equation model modification. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(2), 158–168.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shipley, B. (2003). Testing recursive path models with correlated errors using d-separation. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 214–221.CrossRef Shipley, B. (2003). Testing recursive path models with correlated errors using d-separation. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 214–221.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kirby, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2009). Using instrumental variable (IV) tests to evaluate model specification in latent variable structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 39(1), 327–355.PubMedCrossRef Kirby, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2009). Using instrumental variable (IV) tests to evaluate model specification in latent variable structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 39(1), 327–355.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Accepted for publication in Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x. Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Accepted for publication in Journal of Personality. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1467-6494.​2011.​00739.​x.
16.
go back to reference Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.CrossRef Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., Scheines, R., & Tillman, R. (2010). Automated search for causal relations: Theory and practice. In R. Dechter, H. Geffner, & J. Y. Halpern (Eds.), Heuristics, probability, and causality: A tribute to Judea Pearl (pp. 467–506). London, UK: College Publications. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., Scheines, R., & Tillman, R. (2010). Automated search for causal relations: Theory and practice. In R. Dechter, H. Geffner, & J. Y. Halpern (Eds.), Heuristics, probability, and causality: A tribute to Judea Pearl (pp. 467–506). London, UK: College Publications.
18.
go back to reference Landsheer, J. A. (2010). The specification of causal models with Tetrad IV: A review. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(4), 703–711.CrossRef Landsheer, J. A. (2010). The specification of causal models with Tetrad IV: A review. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(4), 703–711.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xu, L. (2010). Bayesian Ying-Yang system, best harmony learning, and five action circling. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 5(3), 281–328.CrossRef Xu, L. (2010). Bayesian Ying-Yang system, best harmony learning, and five action circling. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 5(3), 281–328.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tu, S., & Xu, L. (2011). Parameterizations make different model selections: Empirical findings from factor analysis. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 6(2), 256–274.CrossRef Tu, S., & Xu, L. (2011). Parameterizations make different model selections: Empirical findings from factor analysis. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 6(2), 256–274.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zheng, Z. E., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research note: Toward a causal interpretation from observational data: A new bayesian networks method for structural models with latent variables. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 365–391.CrossRef Zheng, Z. E., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research note: Toward a causal interpretation from observational data: A new bayesian networks method for structural models with latent variables. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 365–391.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6
Auteur
Cameron N. McIntosh
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0084-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2012

Quality of Life Research 9/2012 Naar de uitgave