Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0360-z.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction is a disabling, chronic, progressive tendon condition that detrimentally affects foot, ankle and lower limb function. Research suggests that posterior tibial tendon dysfunction is poorly recognised and difficult to treat. When posterior tibial tendon dysfunction is diagnosed, the clinician is faced with a weak evidence base and guidelines for the common conservative treatments to guide their management. Moreover, there are no current evidence-based guidelines for the conservative management of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Emerging research suggests that posterior tibial tendon dysfunction not only has a physical impact on the patient, but it also has psychosocial impact on quality of life.
Conservative treatments for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction are generally undertaken during early management. The most common are foot orthoses, exercises, bracing, lifestyle changes and injections. Quantitative evidence supporting conservative treatments for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction in relation to function, pain and patient reported outcome measures are reported in the literature.
There is a paucity of qualitative research investigating the psychosocial impact of the common treatments for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Interpretative phenomenology is concerned with lived experience which is involves the detailed exploration of experience which is embedded within the social and temporal contexts of the lifeworld of the person. The aim of study research is to investigate the lived experience of conservative treatments for patients who have posterior tibial tendon dysfunction using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Five participants with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction were purposively recruited from a private podiatry practice and semi-structured interviews were conducted to examine their lived experiences of treatment for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The data for this study was collected and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
This research identified three superordinate themes which influenced the lived experience of treatment for these patients (i) adverse experience during the patient journey (ii) treatment burden, and (iii) negative self-concept.
This study highlights some of what is anecdotally known about the lived experience of treatment for patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, but has never been studied in a qualitative, methodological manner. This study addresses the gap in the qualitative literature. It reveals novel aspects of the lived experience throughout the patient journey, the detrimental impact of treatment burden, loss and negative self-concept. This evidence is important because it highlights the need for a greater understanding of the psychological and social factors that can influence the lived experience of treatment for this group of patients.
Ingram M, Symmons DPM. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Medicine. 2018;46(3):152–5.
Department of Health. The Musculoskeletal Services Framework,. London, 2006.
Health Education England. Musculoskeletal core capabilities framework for first point of contact practitioners. London: NHS England; 2018.
Speerin R, Slater H, Li L, Moore K, Chan M, Dreinhofer K, et al. Moving from evidence to practice: models of care for the prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014;28(3):479–515. PubMed
Durrant B, Chockalingam N, Hashmi F. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a review. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011;101(2):176–86. PubMed
Kohls-Gatzoulis J, Woods B, Angel JC, Singh D. The prevalence of symptomatic posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction in women over the age of 40 in England. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15(2):75–81. PubMed
Bluman EM, Myerson MS. Stage IV posterior tibial tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12(2):341–62 viii. PubMed
Raikin SM, Winters BS, Daniel JN. The RAM classification: a novel, systematic approach to the adult-acquired flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(2):169–81. PubMed
Johnson KA, Strom DE. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:196–206.
Abousayed MM, Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Dipreta JA. Classifications in brief: Johnson and Strom classification of adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):588–93. PubMed
Durrant B, Chockalingam N, Morriss-Roberts C. Assessment and diagnosis of posterior Tibial tendon dysfunction: do we share the same opinions and beliefs? J am Podiatr med Assoc. 2015.
Durrant B, Chockalingam N, Morriss-Roberts C. Assessment and diagnosis of posterior Tibial tendon dysfunction: do we share the same opinions and beliefs? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016;106(1):27–36. PubMed
Bowring B, Chockalingam N. Conservative treatment of tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction--a review. Foot (Edinb). 2010;20(1):18–26.
Houck J, Neville C, Tome J, Flemister A. Randomized controlled trial comparing Orthosis augmented by either stretching or stretching and strengthening for stage II Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(9):1006–16. PubMed
Neville C, Flemister A, Tome J, Houck J. Comparison of changes in posterior tibialis muscle length between subjects with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and healthy controls during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(11):661–9. PubMed
Hirano T, McCullough MB, Kitaoka HB, Ikoma K, Kaufman KR. Effects of foot orthoses on the work of friction of the posterior tibial tendon. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(9):776–80.
Van de Velde M, Matricali GA, Wuite S, Roels C, Staes F, Deschamps K. Foot segmental motion and coupling in stage II and III tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Biomech. 2017;45:38–42.
Ness ME, Long J, Marks R, Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture. 2008;27(2):331–9. PubMed
Niki H, Ching RP, Kiser P, Sangeorzan BJ. The effect of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction on hindfoot kinematics. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(4):292–300. PubMed
Chao W, Wapner KL, Lee TH, Adams J, Hecht PJ. Nonoperative management of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(12):736–41. PubMed
Jari S, Roberts N, Barrie J. Non-surgical management of tibialis posterior insufficiency. Foot Ankle Surg. 8(3):197–201.
Alvarez RG, Marini A, Schmitt C, Saltzman CL. Stage I and II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction treated by a structured nonoperative management protocol: an orthosis and exercise program. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(1):2–8. PubMed
Lin JL, Balbas J, Richardson EG. Results of non-surgical treatment of stage II posterior Tibial tendon dysfunction: a 7- to 10-year Followup. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(8):781–6. PubMed
Smith J, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretive phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
Shaw RL, Larkin M, Flowers P. Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Evidence Based Med. 2014;19(6):201.
Smith JA. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychol Health. 1996;11(2):261–71.
Tindall LJA, Smith P. Flower and M. Larkin (2009), interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Qual Res Psychol. 2009;6(4):346–7.
Ellen ME, Shach R, Balicer RD. Helping patients help themselves: supporting the healthcare journey. Patient Educ Couns. 2018.
Aujoulat I, Marcolongo R, Bonadiman L, Deccache A. Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: a critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(5):1228–39. PubMed
Hackl F, Hummer M, Pruckner GJ. Old boys’ network in general practitioners’ referral behavior? J Health Econ. 2015;43:56–73. PubMed
Charmaz K. Loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociol Health Illn. 1983;5(2):168–95. PubMed
McPoil TG, Hunt GC. Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21(6):381–8. PubMed
Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable JW, Myers J. An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci. 2013;36(6):661–79. PubMed
McKee PR, Rivard A. Biopsychosocial approach to orthotic intervention. J Hand Ther. 2011;24(2):155–63. PubMed
Chevalier TL, Chockalingam N. Foot orthoses: a review focusing on kinematics. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011;101(4):341–8. PubMed
Arnoldner MA, Gruber M, Syré S, Kristen K-H, Trnka H-J, Kainberger F, et al. Imaging of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction—comparison of high-resolution ultrasound and 3 T MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(9):1777–81. PubMed
Kulig K, Lee SP, Reischl SF, Noceti-DeWit L. Effect of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction on unipedal standing balance test. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(1):83–9. PubMed
Hockey J, Dilley R, Robinson V, Sherlock A. Worn shoes: identity, Memory and Footwear. Socio Res Online. 2013;18(1):20.
Dilley R, Hockey J, Robinson V, Sherlock A. Occasions and non-occasions: identity, femininity and high-heeled shoes. Eur J Women's Stud. 2014;22(2):143–58.
- “I need somebody who knows about feet” a qualitative study investigating the lived experiences of conservative treatment for patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
Rona Frances Campbell
- BioMed Central