Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

11. Het inleiden van de baring

Auteurs : F. J. M. E. Roumen, F. K. Lotgering, G. G. M. Essed

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Onder inductie (letterlijk: het opwekken van een proces door een uitwendige prikkel) van de baring wordt verstaan het kunstmatig op gang brengen van het proces van de bevalling. Het is wenselijk om onderscheid te maken tussen:

vorige hoofdstuk Amnio-infusie

volgende hoofdstuk Doppler-flow

Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, le Cessie S, van Hemel OJ. Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 68: 97-103.

Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 164-7.

Rorie DK, Newton M. Histologic and chemical studies of the smooth muscle in the human cervix and uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 99: 466-9.

Breeveld-Dwarkasing VN, te Koppele JM, Bank RA, van der Weijden GC, Taverne MA, van Dissel-Emiliani FM. Changes in water content, collagen degradation, collagen content, and concentration in repeated biopsies of the cervix of pregnant cows. Biol Reprod 2003; 69: 1608-14.

Collins JJ, Usip S, McCarson KE, Papka RE. Sensory nerves and neuropeptides in uterine cervical ripening. Peptides 2002; 23: 167-83.

Valentin L, Bergelin I. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 256-62.

Novakov-Mikic A, Ivanovic L, Dukanac J. Transvaginal ultrasonography of uterine cervix in prediction of the outcome of labour induction. Med Pregl 2000; 53: 569-78.

Van Dessel HJHM, Frijns JHM, Kok FThJGTh, Wallenburg HCS. Ultrasound assessment of cervical dynamics during the first stage of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 53: 123-7.

Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 266-8.

Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, Bracalente G, Fadalti M, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1361-7.

Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1565-72.

Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 235-9.

Vrouenraets FPJM, Roumen FJME, Dehing CJG, van den Akker ESA, Aarts MJB, Scheve EJT. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 690-7.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 9 2001.

Kiss H, Ahner R, Hohlagschwandtner M, Leitich H, Husslein P. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of term labor: a literature review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 3-7.

Howarth GR, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 3: CD003250.

Caldeyro-Barcia R, Poseiro JJ. Oxytocin and contractility of the pregnant human uterus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1959; 75: 813-30.

Kelly AJ, Tan B. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 3: CD003246.

Keirse MJ. Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening: Meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience. J Reprod Med 1993; 38(1 Suppl): 89-100.

Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 1: CD000941.

van Gemund N, Scherjon S, LeCessie S, van Leeuwen JH, van Roosmalen J, Kanhai HH. A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction. BJOG. 2004; 111: 42-9.

Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 1: CD000451.

Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 4: CD001233.

Matonhodze BB, Hofmeyr GJ, Levin J. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone. S Afr Med J 2003; 93: 375-9.

Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004; 329: 19-25.

Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 3-8.

Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 171-6

Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of caesarean delivery with elective induction of labour at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 600-7.

Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 240-4.

Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1511-5.

Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 628-33.

Maslow AS, Sweeney AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 87-22.

Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts DH, Critchlow CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 986-94.

Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15: 131-9.

Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 47-52.

Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 698-704.

Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 287-93.

Ecker JL, Chen kT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 883-7.

Crane SS, Wojtowycz MA, Dye TD, Aubry RH, Artal R. Association between prepregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 213-6.

Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor induction, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 452-6.

Titel: Het inleiden van de baring
Auteurs: F. J. M. E. Roumen
F. K. Lotgering
G. G. M. Essed
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Foetale bewaking
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1642-7

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1643-4

Copyright: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1643-4_11

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen