Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 5/2024

11-12-2023 | Review

Health-related quality of life in patients with extremity bone sarcoma after surgical treatment: a systematic review

Auteurs: Liam Fernando-Canavan, Patrick Abraham, Nancy Devlin, An Tran-Duy

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting on measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with a special focus on the use of the preference-weighted instruments, in patients with extremity bone sarcoma treated with limb-salvage surgery or amputation.

Methods

We searched MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for English-language studies reporting on HRQoL of patients with bone sarcoma from inception to 28 August 2023. All records found were independently reviewed by two reviewers. We used the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the CONSORT 2010 checklist to assess the quality of the cohort and randomised studies, respectively.

Results

The search identified 1225 records, of which 16 studies were included for data extraction. Only one study used a preference-weighted instrument for measuring HRQoL in a small sample of patients (n = 28). Ten studies used the generic SF-36 questionnaire, but no preference-weighted HRQoL based on SF-6D was derived from the SF-36 scores. Most studies comparing HRQoL between amputation and limb-salvage surgery reported no significant differences. Twelve cohort studies scored six or more out of nine points based on the NOS. The only randomised study scored 54% on the CONSORT 2010 checklist.

Conclusions

The approaches used to measure HRQoL were inconsistent and outcome scores varied substantially. Only one study used preference-weighted instruments for HRQoL measurement. Future research into the surgical treatment of extremity bone sarcoma should consider the use of preference-weighted instruments to measure HRQoL, which will therefore enable economic evaluation for the growing orthopaedic armamentarium of novel surgical interventions.

Registration

This systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021282380).
volgende artikel Health-related quality of life of people with heart failure in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Hameed, M., & Dorfman, H. (2011). Primary malignant bone tumors—recent developments. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, 28(1), 86–101.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Luetke, A., Meyers, P. A., Lewis, I., & Juergens, H. (2014). Osteosarcoma treatment–where do we stand? A state of the art review. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 40(4), 523–532.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Bielack, S. S., Kempf-Bielack, B., Gn, D., Exner, G. U., Flege, S., Helmke, K., Kotz, R., Salzer-Kuntschik, M., Werner, M., & Winkelmann, W. (2002). Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: An analysis of 1702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(3), 776–790.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Errani, C., Longhi, A., Rossi, G., Rimondi, E., Biazzo, A., Toscano, A., Alì, N., Ruggieri, P., Alberghini, M., & Picci, P. (2011). Palliative therapy for osteosarcoma. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 11(2), 217–227.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Bielack, S., Jürgens, H., Jundt, G., Kevric, M., Kühne, T., Reichardt, P., Zoubek, A., Werner, M., Winkelmann, W., & Kotz, R. (2009). Osteosarcoma: the COSS experience. Pediatric and adolescent osteosarcoma (pp. 289–308). Springer.CrossRef
7.
Jaffe, N. (2009). Osteosarcoma: review of the past, impact on the future. The American experience. Pediatric and adolescent osteosarcoma (pp. 239–262). Springer.CrossRef
8.
Longhi, A., Errani, C., De Paolis, M., Mercuri, M., & Bacci, G. (2006). Primary bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age: State of the art. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 32(6), 423–436.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Young, P., Bell, S., & Mahendra, A. (2015). The evolving role of computer-assisted navigation in musculoskeletal oncology. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97(2), 258–264.CrossRef
11.
Dong, C., Beglinger, I., & Krieg, A. H. (2022). Personalized 3D-printed guide in malignant bone tumor resection and following reconstruction–17 cases in pelvic and extremities. Surgical Oncology, 42, 101733.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Angelini, A., Trovarelli, G., Berizzi, A., Pala, E., Breda, A., & Ruggieri, P. (2019). Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions: From revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions. International Orthopaedics, 43, 123–132.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wong, R. M. Y., Wong, P. Y., Liu, C., Chung, Y. L., Wong, K. C., Tso, C. Y., Chow, S.K.-H., Cheung, W.-H., Yung, P.S.-H., & Chui, C. S. (2021). 3D printing in orthopaedic surgery: A scoping review of randomized controlled trials. Bone & Joint Research, 10(12), 807–819.CrossRef
14.
Whitehead, S. J., & Ali, S. (2010). Health outcomes in economic evaluation: The QALY and utilities. British Medical Bulletin, 96(1), 5–21.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., & Feeny, D. (2002). Health utility estimation. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2(2), 99–108.CrossRef
16.
Devlin, N. J., & Brooks, R. (2017). EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: Past, present and future. Applied Health economics and Health policy, 15(2), 127–137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Furlong, W. J., Feeny, D. H., Torrance, G. W., & Barr, R. D. (2001). The Health Utilities Index (HUI®) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 375–384.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Tang, M. H., Pan, D. J., Castle, D. J., & Choong, P. F. (2012). A systematic review of the recent quality of life studies in adult extremity sarcoma survivors. Sarcoma, 2012, 171342.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Higgins, J. P. T. T. J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
22.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
24.
Adolescent, Group YAOPR. (2006). Closing the gap: Research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
25.
26.
27.
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & the CG,. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8(1), 18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Aksnes, L. H., Bauer, H. C. F., Jebsen, N. L., Folleras, G., Allert, C., Haugen, G. S., & Hall, K. S. (2008). Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: A Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume, 90(6), 786–794.CrossRef
29.
Bekkering, W. P., Billing, L., Grimer, R. J., Vlieland, T. P. M. V., Koopman, H. M., Nelissen, R. G. H. H., & Taminiau, A. H. M. (2013). Translation and preliminary validation of the English version of the DUX questionnaire for lower extremity bone tumor patients (Bt-DUX): A disease-specific measure for quality of life. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 107(4), 353–359.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Malek, F., Somerson, J. S., Mitchel, S., & Williams, R. P. (2012). Does limb-salvage surgery offer patients better quality of life and functional capacity than amputation? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(7), 2000–2006.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Mason, G. E., Aung, L., Gall, S., Meyers, P. A., Butler, R., Krug, S., Kim, M., Healey, J. H., & Gorlick, R. (2013). Quality of life following amputation or limb preservation in patients with lower extremity bone sarcoma. Frontiers in Oncology, 3, 210.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Robert, R. S., Ottaviani, G., Huh, W. W., Palla, S., & Jaffe, N. (2010). Psychosocial and functional outcomes in long-term survivors of osteosarcoma: A comparison of limb-salvage surgery and amputation. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 54(7), 990–999.CrossRef
33.
Silva, R. S., Tabet, L. P., Batista, K. T., Naves, J. F., Viana, E. D. E. M. B. O., & Guilhem, D. B. (2020). Quality of life in adults with sarcomas under conservative surgery or amputation. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira, 28(5), 236–242.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Solooki, S., Mostafavizadeh Ardestani, S. M., Mahdaviazad, H., & Kardeh, B. (2018). Function and quality of life among primary osteosarcoma survivors in Iran: Amputation versus limb salvage. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 102(2), 147–151.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Yonemoto, T., Ishii, T., Takeuchi, Y., Kimura, K., Hagiwara, Y., Iwata, S., & Tatezaki, S.-i. (2007). Evaluation of quality of life (QOL) in long-term survivors of high-grade osteosarcoma: A Japanese single center experience. Anticancer Research, 27(5B), 3621–3624.PubMed
36.
Avasthi, S., Mahapatra, S., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, V., Aslam, A., Kumar, P., & Mishra. M. (2023). Outcome analysis of en-bloc excision and endoprosthetic replacement among the cases operated for distal femoral and proximal tibial giant cell tumour around the knee: A retrospective study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 17(4), RC05–RC08.
37.
Barrera, M., Teall, T., Barr, R., Silva, M., & Greenberg, M. (2012). Health related quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of lower extremity bone tumors. Pediatric Blood and Cancer, 58(2), 265–273.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Jing, S., Ding, F., Yuan, Y., An, J., & He, Q. (2022). Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus limb-sparing surgery for osteosarcoma and its impact on long-term quality of life. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2022, 1–6.
39.
Bekkering, W. P., Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M., Koopman, H. M., Schaap, G. R., Schreuder, H. W. B., Beishuizen, A., Tissing, W. J. E., Hoogerbrugge, P. M., Anninga, J. K., & Taminiau, A. H. M. (2010). Quality of life in young patients after bone tumor surgery around the knee joint and comparison with healthy controls. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 54(5), 738–745.CrossRef
40.
Fowler, E. G., Eckardt, J. J., Vuong, A., Greenberg, M. B., Yamaguchi, K., Bukata, S. V., & Bernthal, N. (2021). Gait outcomes following proximal tibial tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. Gait & Posture, 88, 167–173.CrossRef
41.
Gradl, G., Postl, L. K., Lenze, U., Stolberg-Stolberg, J., Pohlig, F., Rechl, H., Schmitt-Sody, M., von Eisenhart-Rothe, R., & Kirchhoff, C. (2015). Long-term functional outcome and quality of life following rotationplasty for treatment of malignant tumors. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16, 262.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Suresh Nathan, S., Tan Lay Hua, G., Mei Yoke, C., Mann Hong, T., & Peter Pereira, B. (2021). Outcome satisfaction in long-term survivors of oncologic limb salvage procedures. European Journal of Cancer Care, 30(2), e13377.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.PubMedCrossRef
44.
45.
Stokke, J., Sung, L., Gupta, A., Lindberg, A., & Rosenberg, A. R. (2015). Systematic review and meta-analysis of objective and subjective quality of life among pediatric, adolescent, and young adult bone tumor survivors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(9), 1616–1629.CrossRef
46.
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. JMd., Kaasa, S., Klee, M., Osoba, D., Razavi, D., Rofe, P. B., Schraub, S., Sneeuw, K., Sullivan, M., & Takeda, F. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Bekkering, W. P., Vlieland, T. P. M. V., Koopman, H. M., Schaap, G. R., Schreuder, H. W. B., Beishuizen, A., Tissing, W. J. E., Hoogerbrugge, P. M., Anninga, J. K., & Taminiau, A. H. M. (2009). The Bt-DUX: Development of a subjective measure of health-related quality of life in patients who underwent surgery for lower extremity malignant bone tumor. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 53(3), 348–355.CrossRef
48.
Fekkes, M., Kamphuis, R. P., Ottenkamp, J., Verrips, E., Vogels, T., Kamphuis, M., & Verloove-vanhorick, S. P. (2001). Health-related quality of life in young adults with minor congenital heart disease. Psychology & Health, 16(2), 239–250.CrossRef
49.
Evans. DR., Cope, WE. (1989). Manual for the quality of life questionnaire. Multy-Health Systems.
50.
Ferrell, B. R., Hassey Dow, K., & Grant, M. (1995). Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Quality of Life Research, 4(6), 523–531.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Choong, P. F. M. (2021). Sarcoma : A practical guide to multidisciplinary management. Springer.CrossRef
52.
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Keller, S. (2001). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A user's manual 1994.
53.
Laucis, N. C., Hays, R. D., & Bhattacharyya, T. (2015). Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: A brief guide. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 97(19), 1628.
54.
Thornley, P., Vicente, M., MacDonald, A., Evaniew, N., Ghert, M., & Velez, R. (2019). Causes and frequencies of reoperations after endoprosthetic reconstructions for extremity tumor surgery: A systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 477(4), 894–902.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Lathouwers, E., Díaz, M. A., Maricot, A., Tassignon, B., Cherelle, C., Cherelle, P., Meeusen, R., & De Pauw, K. (2023). Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: A systematic review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 20(1), 4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Chen, A. F., Kazarian, G. S., Jessop, G. W., & Makhdom, A. (2018). Robotic technology in orthopaedic surgery. JBJS, 100(22), 1984–1992.CrossRef
57.
Moschetti, W. E., Konopka, J. F., Rubash, H. E., & Genuario, J. W. (2016). Can robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty be cost-effective? A Markov decision analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 31(4), 759–765.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Khan, F., Pearle, A., Lightcap, C., Boland, P. J., & Healey, J. H. (2013). Haptic robot-assisted surgery improves accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors: A pilot study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(3), 851–859.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Sherman, W. F., & Wu, V. J. (2020). Robotic surgery in total joint arthroplasty: A survey of the AAHKS membership to understand the utilization, motivations, and perceptions of total joint surgeons. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 35(12), 3474-3481.e3472.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Beck, A. C. C., Kieffer, J. M., Retèl, V. P., van Overveld, L. F. J., Takes, R. P., van den Brekel, M. W. M., van Harten, W. H., & Stuiver, M. M. (2019). Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 to the EQ-5D for head and neck cancer: Can disease-specific utilities be obtained? PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0226077.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
Rowen, D., Brazier, J., Young, T., Gaugris, S., Craig, B. M., King, M. T., & Velikova, G. (2011). Deriving a preference-based measure for cancer using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value Health, 14(5), 721–731.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Brazier, J. E., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., & Rowen, D. L. (2010). A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. The European Journal of Health Economics, 11(2), 215–225.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Bray, N., Spencer, L. H., & Edwards, R. T. (2020). Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in congenital mobility impairment: A systematic review of validity and responsiveness. Health Econ Rev, 10(1), 9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
King, M. T., Costa, D. S. J., Aaronson, N. K., Brazier, J. E., Cella, D. F., Fayers, P. M., Grimison, P., Janda, M., Kemmler, G., Norman, R., Pickard, A. S., Rowen, D., Velikova, G., Young, T. A., & Viney, R. (2016). QLU-C10D: A health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 25(3), 625–636.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Gamper, E.-M., King, M. T., Norman, R., Loth, F. L. C., Holzner, B., Kemmler, G., & the EQoLG,. (2022). The EORTC QLU-C10D discrete choice experiment for cancer patients: A first step towards patient utility weights. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6(1), 42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Health-related quality of life in patients with extremity bone sarcoma after surgical treatment: a systematic review
Auteurs
Liam Fernando-Canavan
Patrick Abraham
Nancy Devlin
An Tran-Duy
Publicatiedatum
11-12-2023
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03554-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2024

Quality of Life Research 5/2024 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: a cross-sectional survey

OriginalPaper

Trajectory of health-related quality of life in parents of children treated with epilepsy surgery versus medical therapy

OriginalPaper

Measuring patient activation: the utility of the Patient Activation Measure administered in an interview setting

OriginalPaper

Anchor-based minimal important difference values are often sensitive to the distribution of the change score

OriginalPaper

Scoring the EQ-HWB-S: can we do it without value sets? A non-parametric item response theory analysis

OriginalPaper

Measuring reconceptualization and reprioritization during France’s first COVID-19-related lockdown in women with and without a history of cancer: an adaptation of the SeiQol-DW and PGI