Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
There is no global definition of well-being. Cultural differences in the perception of well-being and the social and behavioral contexts further limit its measurement. Existing instruments are developed in Western societies that differ in their conceptualization of well-being from Asian populations. Moreover, very few instruments address the multidimensional construct of well-being.
Literature was reviewed to develop a priori conceptual framework of mental health and well-being. Concepts were identified based on specific criteria to guide the qualitative investigations. Finally, focus group discussions were conducted among adults belonging to the three major ethnicities in Singapore to identify salient domains of mental health and well-being.
Mental well-being is a multidimensional construct constituting of positive affect, satisfaction, and psychological functioning. While well-being explains the functional and psychological components, positive mental health is a combination of these and the skills required to achieve them. Although there is an overlap between the concepts identified from the literature and those identified in Singapore, certain differences existed, particularly with the relevance attributed to family interactions and religiosity or spirituality. Similar findings were observed across the three ethnic groups.
Domains identified can be used to develop a culturally relevant instrument in Singapore.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Becker, T., Leese, M., Clarkson, P., et al. (1988). Links between social networks and quality of life: An epidemiologically representative study of psychotic patients in South London. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33(7), 299–304. CrossRef
Bradley, D. E. (1995). Religious involvement and social resources: Evidence from the data set ‘Americans Changing Lives’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(2), 259–267. CrossRef
Dalkey, N. C. (1972). The Delphi method: An experimental application of group opinion. In N. C. Dalkey, D. L. Rourke, R. Lewis, & D. Snyder (Eds.), Studies in the quality of life. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. CrossRef
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 325–337). New York: Guilford.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(5), 1–31. CrossRef
Gilbert, P., & Nicholls, V. (2003). Inspiring hope: Recognising the importance of spirituality in a whole person approach to mental health. London: National Institute for Mental Health in England.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Source book for measuring well-being with Affectometer 2, Dunedin, New Zealand: Why not? Foundation Psychologist, 35, 259–265.
Krause, N. (1995). Religiosity and self-esteem among older adults. The Journals of Gerentology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50(5), 236–246. CrossRef
Lee, E. (2007). Religion and spirituality as predictors of well-being among Chinese American and Korean American older adults. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 19(3), 77–100. CrossRef
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publication.
Maslow, A., Robert, F., & James, F. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Quintiliani, L., Campbell, M., Haines, P., & Webber, K. (2009). The use of the pile sort method in identifying groups of healthful lifestyle behaviors among female community college students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(9), 1503–1507. CrossRef
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. CrossRef
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 482–493. CrossRef
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., et al. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(63), 1477–7525.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. California: Sage Publications.
World Health Organization Promoting Mental Health. (2004). Concepts emerging evidence and practice. Summary report.
World Health Organization. (1998). WHOQOL and spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs: Report on WHO consultation. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2001). Strengthening mental health promotion.
www.healthscotland.com/understanding/population/mental-health-indicators.aspx. Review of scales of positive mental health validated for use with adults in the UK: Technical report. Accessed 13 Nov 2011.
Zhang, L. (2005). Prediction of Chinese life satisfaction; contribution of collective self-esteem. International Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 189–200. CrossRef
- From well-being to positive mental health: conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore
Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar
Yee Wei Lim
Kian Woon Kwok
Maria Orlando Edelen
Siow Ann Chong
- Springer Netherlands