Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Atypical parkinsonism (AP) has a considerable impact on the lives not only of patients but also of their carers. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument for assessing the quality of life (QoL) of carers of patients with AP.
A 40-item pool was generated from in-depth interviews with carers of patients with AP, a thorough review of the existing literature and consultation with movement disorder experts. Item refinement and reduction was performed using the results of pilot testing and a survey in 282 carers of multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients and 226 carers of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) patients. A validation study, with responses of 243 carers of MSA and 187 carers of PSP patients, was undertaken to evaluate the psychometric properties of the final 26-item scale.
The validation study results suggest that the scale is unidimensional and has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96). The correlations of scale scores with patients’ health status and QoL measures, such as PDQ-39 summary score and EQ-5D index (Spearman’s ρ = 0.56 and −0.31, respectively, P < 0.001), as well as carers’ measures, such as Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) total and EQ-5D index (Spearman’s ρ = 0.85 and −0.39, respectively, P < 0.001), document the convergent and concurrent validity of the scale. ANOVA results support the discriminant validity of the scale, as evidenced by its capacity to differentiate between carers with varying levels of self-reported health.
The 26-item Parkinsonism Carers QoL (PQoL Carer) is a concise instrument with adequate psychometric qualities that can be used for clinical and research purposes.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Schrag, A., Geser, F., Stampfer-Kountchev, M., et al. (2006). Health-related quality of life in Multiple Systems Atrophy. Movement Disorders, 22, 809–815. CrossRef
The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208. CrossRef
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrica, 35, 401–416. CrossRef
Dziuban, C., & Shirkey, E. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361. CrossRef
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30, 179–185. CrossRef
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402. CrossRef
Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Griffin, B. W. (2001). Exploratory analysis of the structure of scores from the multidimensional scales of perceived self-efficacy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 475–489. CrossRef
Costello, A. B., Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 10. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7. Accessed December 15, 2014.
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. CrossRef
- Development and validation of a carers quality-of-life questionnaire for parkinsonism (PQoL Carers)
Niall P. Quinn
- Springer International Publishing