Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Condition-specific measures may not always have independent items, yet existing techniques of developing health state utility values from these measures are inappropriate when items are not independent. This study develops methods for deriving and valuing health states for a condition-specific preference-based measure where items are not independent.
The analysis has three stages: firstly, Rasch analysis is used to develop a health state classification system from the Flushing Symptoms Questionnaire (FSQ) that is amenable to valuation and to identify a set of health states for valuation. Secondly, a valuation survey of the health states using time-trade-off (TTO) methods is conducted to elicit health state values. Finally, regression models are applied to map the relationship between mean TTO values and Rasch logit values. The model is then used to estimate health state values for all possible health states.
Rasch models were fitted to 1,270 responders to the FSQ and a series of 16 health states were identified for the valuation exercise. An ordinary least squares model best described the relationship between mean TTO values and Rasch logit values (R 2 = 0.958; root mean square error = 0.042).
This study demonstrates how health state utility values can be mapped onto Rasch logit values in order to value all states defined by the FSQ, a condition-specific measure where items are not independent. This should significantly enhance research in this field.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., O’Brien, B. J., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brazier, J. E., Deverill, M., Harper, R., & Booth, A. (1999) A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation . Health Technology Assess 3(9).
Brazier, J. E., Ratcliffe, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Solomon, J. (2007). Measuring and valuing health for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, T., Yang, Y., Brazier, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2007). The use of Rasch analysis as a tool in the construction of a preference-based measure: The case of AQLQ. HEDS Discussion Paper Series No. 07/01 http://www.shef.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/discussion.html.
Mavranezouli, I., Brazier, J. E., Young, T. A., & Barkham, M. (2009). Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-5D utility from CORE-OM in order to elicit preferences for common mental health problems. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper 09/09. ScHARR, University of Sheffield.
Norquist, J., Watson, D. J., QWinfen, Yu., Paolini, J. F., McQuarrie, K., & Santanello, N. C. (2007). Validation of a questionnaire to assess niacin-induced cutaneous flushing. Current Medical research and Opinions, 23(7), 1549–1560. CrossRef
AHFS Consumer Medication Information. American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacists. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=meds&log$=drug_bottom_one&part=a682518 Last visited on 07/10/2009.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Reprinted 1980).
Chatfield, C., & Collins, A. J. (1980). Introduction to multivariate analysis. Cambridge: Chapman and Hall/University Press.
Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122. PubMed
Kubinger, K. D. (2005). Psychological test calibration using the Rasch model—some critical suggestions on traditional approaches. International Journal of Testing, 5(4), 377–394. CrossRef
Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Models (RUMM) 2020 ©. RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd 1997–2004.
SPSS Inc. (2005). Release 14.0.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
StataCorp. (2008). Statistical Software: Release 10.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
Youngblut, J. M., & Casper, G. R. (1993). Single-item indicators in nursing research. Research in Nursing and Health, 16(6), 459–465. PubMed
Kind, P., Hardman, G., & Macran, S. (1999). UK population norms for EQ-5D. Centre for Health Economics Discussion Paper Series, University of York.
- Developing preference-based health measures: using Rasch analysis to generate health state values
Tracey A. Young
John E. Brazier
- Springer Netherlands