Top

Kind en adolescent

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2005 | Artikelen

De gehechtheidstheorie als ‘grand theory’?

Grenzen en vooruitzichten van een theorie over sociale verbondenheid

Auteur: Carlo Schuengel

Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent | Uitgave 1/2005

Samenvatting

Voor onderzoekers en professionals op het terrein van kinderen en gezinnen is de gehechtheidstheorie een onontbeerlijk onderdeel geworden van de wetenschappelijke scholing. Het toepassingsgebied van de gehechtheidstheorie is de laatste jaren verbreed van kinderen naar adolescenten en volwassenen, en van doorsnee gezinnen naar klinische groepen, bijzondere opvoedingssituaties en therapeutische relaties. Ontwikkelt de gehechtheidstheorie zich op deze manier tot een ‘grand theory’ van alles wat met sociale verbondenheid te maken heeft? Aan de hand van deze vraag worden in dit artikel de grenzen van de gehechtheidstheorie verkend, en worden conclusies getrokken ten aanzien van het onderzoek dat nodig is om de theorie in onderzoek en in de hulpverlening op een juiste manier verder te ontwikkelen en toe te passen.

vorige artikel Mogelijke oorzaken en gevolgen van een (on)veilige eerste gehechtheidsrelatie

volgende artikel Risicofactoren in de ontwikkeling

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behavior of one year olds in a strange situation. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior (pp. 113-136). London: Methuen.

Allen, N. B., & Badcock, P. B. T. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 887-913.CrossRefPubMed

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong - desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human-motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.CrossRefPubMed

Belsky, J., & Cassidy, J. (1994). Attachment: Theory and evidence. In M. Rutter, & D. Hay (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians (pp. 373-402). Oxford: Blackwell.

Belsky, J., Jaffee, S. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T., & Silva, P. A. (2003). Intergenerational relationships in young adulthood and their life course, mental health, and personality correlates. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 460-471.CrossRefPubMed

Boris, N. W., Hinshaw-Fuselier, S. S., Smyke, A. T., Scheeringa, M. S., Heller, S. S., & Zeanah, C. H. (2004). Comparing criteria for attachment disorders: Establishing reliability and validity in high-risk samples. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 568-577.CrossRefPubMed

Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 350-373.PubMed

Bowlby, J. (1984). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2 ed.). London: Penguin.

Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. A. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships: A construct revisited. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 89-111). New York: The Guilford Press.

Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 779-818.CrossRefPubMed

Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child's ties. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 3-20). New York: Guilford.

Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.) (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.

Cassidy, J., Kirsh, S. J., Scolton, K. L., & Parke, R. D. (1996). Attachment and representations of peer relationships. Developmental Psychology, 32, 892-904.CrossRef

Cicchetti, D., Toth, S. L., & Lynch, M. (1995). Bowlby's dream comes full circle: The application of attachment theory to risk and psychopathology. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 1-75.

Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in childrens social-adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.CrossRef

De Roos, S. A., Miedema, S., & Iedema, J. (2001). Attachment, working models of self and others, and God concept in kindergarten. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 607-618.CrossRef

Dixon, W. (2002). 20 Studies that revolutionized the study of child development. Developments, 45, 1.

Ferrari, P. F., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., & Fogassi, L. (2003). Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1703-1714.CrossRefPubMed

Hinde, R. A., & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1988). Epilogue.In R. A. Hinde, & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influence (pp. 365-385). Oxford: Clarendon.

Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.CrossRefPubMed

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1999). Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 803-822). New York: Guilford.

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339.CrossRefPubMed

Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145-162.CrossRef

Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research (pp. 66-104). Society for Research in Child Development.

Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure-disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern. In T. B. Brazelton, & M. W. Yogman (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95-124). Norwood, nj: Ablex.

Marris, P. (1991). The social construction of uncertainty. In C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 77-90). London: Routledge Tavistock.

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn-infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702-709.CrossRefPubMed

O’Connor, T. G., & Zeanah, C. H. (2003). Attachment disorders: Assessment strategies and treatment approaches. Attachment and Human Development, 5, 223-244.CrossRefPubMed

Porges, S. W. (2003). Social engagement and attachment: A phylogenetic perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 31-47.CrossRefPubMed

Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A. (1983). Mogelijke oorzaken en gevolgen van een (on)veilige eerste gehechtheidsrelatie. Een overzicht aan de hand van een model. Kind en adolescent, 4, 23-44.

Schuengel, C., De Schipper, J. C., & Sterkenburg, P. M. (2003). Hechtingsstoornissen en verstoorde gehechtheid. In S. Colijn, E. C. A. Collumbien, G. Lietaer, & R. W. Trijsburg (Red.), Handboek integratieve psychotherapie (pp. 8.1-1-8.1-23). Utrecht: Tijdstroom.

Schuengel, C., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2001). Attachment in mental health institutions: A critical review of assumptions, clinical implications, and research strategies. Attachment and Human Development, 3, 304-323.CrossRefPubMed

Spangler, G., & Grossmann, K. E. (1993). Biobehavioral organization in securely and insecurely attached infants. Child Development, 64, 1439-1450.CrossRefPubMed

Sroufe, A. L. (1979). Socioemotional development. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 462-516). New York: John Wiley.

Sroufe, L. A., Carlson, E. A., Levy, A. K., & Egeland, B. (1999). Implications of attachment theory for developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 1-13.CrossRefPubMed

Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387-403.CrossRefPubMed

Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Sagi, A., & Lambermon, M. W. E. (1992). The multiple caretaker paradox: Some data from Holland and Israel. In R. C. Pianta (Ed.), New Directions in Child Development: Relationships between children and non-parental adults (pp. 5-24). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Waters, E. (2000). Notes on attachment as grand theory. Internet: http://www.psychology.sunysb http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/ewaters/552/

Waters, E., Weinfield, N. S., & Hamilton, C. E. (2000). The stability of attachment security from infancy to adolescence and early adulthood: General discussion. Child Development, 71, 703-706.CrossRefPubMed

Zeanah, C. H., Scheeringa, M., Boris, N. W., Heller, S. S., Smyke, A. T., & Trapani, J. (2004). Reactive attachment disorder in maltreated toddlers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 877-888.CrossRefPubMed

Zegers, M. A. M., Schuengel, C., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2004). Attachment representations of institutionalized adolescents and their professional caregivers: Predicting the development of therapeutic relationships. Ongepubliceerd manuscript.

Zeijlmans-van Emmichhoven, I. A., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., De Ruiter, C., & Brosschot, J. F. (2003). Selective processing of threatening information: Effects of attachment representation and anxiety disorder on attention and memory. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 219-237.CrossRef

Zimmermann, P. (1999). Structure and functions of internal working models of attachment and their role for emotion regulation. Attachment and Human Development, 3, 291-306.CrossRef

Ziv, Y., Oppenheim, D., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2004). Social information processing in middle childhood: Relations to infant-mother attachment. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 327-348.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: De gehechtheidstheorie als ‘grand theory’?
Grenzen en vooruitzichten van een theorie over sociale verbondenheid
Auteur: Carlo Schuengel
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2005
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent / Uitgave 1/2005
Print ISSN: 0167-2436
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03060932

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2005

Mogelijke oorzaken en gevolgen van een (on)veilige eerste gehechtheidsrelatie

Toekomstgericht

Risicofactoren in de ontwikkeling

Inzicht in emoties bij kinderen met aan autisme verwante stoornissen

Depressies bij kinderen en adolescenten

De invloed van televisie op fantasiespel: een onderzoeksoverzicht