Top

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2009 | Wetenschap kritisch bekeken

Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial1)

Beaver K, Tysver-Robinson D, Campbell M, Twomey M, Williamson S, Hindley A, Susnerwala S, Dunn G, Luker K

Auteur: Berry Middel

Gepubliceerd in: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice | Uitgave 2/2009

Samenvatting

In veel landen vormen het klinisch onderzoek, consultatie en routinemammografie de basis van de nazorg voor vrouwen in remissie van borstkanker waarbij het primaire doel is objectief de veranderingen die op recidive kunnen wijzen op tijd te detecteren.2) Deze vorm van herhaalde observaties is net zo effectief, in termen van overlevingskans en kwaliteit van leven, als meer intensieve benaderingen2) en het

vorige artikel Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asympto matic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial

volgende artikel Effects of a multifaceted psychiatric intervention targeted for the complex medically ill: a randomised controlled trial1)

1).

Beaver K, Tysver-Robinson D, Campbell M, Twomey M, Williamson S, Hindley A, et al. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ 2009; Jan 14;338:a3147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3147.

2).

Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R, et al. Follow up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(1):CD001768.

3).

te Boekhorst DS, Peer NG, van der Sluis RF, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ. Periodic follow-up after breast cancer and the effect on survival. Eur J Surg 2001; 167:490–496.

4).

Ashkanani F, Sarkar T, Needham G, Coldwells A, Ah-See AK, Gilbert FJ, et al. What is achieved by mammographic surveillance after breast conservation treatment for breast cancer? Am J Surg 2001; 182:207–210.

5).

Churn M, Kelly V. Outpatient follow-up after treatment for early breast cancer: updated results after 5 years. Clin Oncol 2001; 13:187–94.

6).

Dewar J, Kerr G. Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast. BMJ 1985; 291:1464–1467.

7).

Donnelly J, Mack P, Donaldson LA. Followup of breast cancer: time for a new approach? Int J Clin Pract 2001; 55:431–433.

8).

Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Cole D, Stewart J, et al. Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomized trial. BMJ 1996; 313:665–669.

9).

Snee M. Routine follow-up of breast cancer patients. Clin Oncol 1994; 6:154–156.

10).

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Improving outcomes in breast cancer. London: Nice, 2002.

11).

Beaver K, Luker KA. Follow-up in breast clinics: reassuring for patients rather than detecting recurrence. Psychooncology 2005; 14:94–101.

12).

Grunfeld E, Many D, Vessey MP, Fitzpatrick. Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract 1995; 12:60–65.

13).

Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O'Neil J, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. Jama 1997; 277:1485–1492.

14).

Luker KA, Beaver K, Leinster SJ, Owens RG. The information needs of women with breast cancer: a follow up study. J Adv Nurs 1996; 23:487–495.

15).

McArdle J, George WD, McArdle CS, Smith DC, Moodie AR, Hughson AV, et al. Psychological support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a randomised study. BMJ 1996; 312:813–816.

16).

Baildam A, Keeling F, Noblet M, Thomson L, Bundred N, Hopwood P. Nurse led follow-up clinics for women treated for primary breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38(suppl 3):136.

17).

Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Scholten R. Toolbox deel1: gerandomiseerd klinisch onderzoek. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice 2007; 6:8–12.

18).

Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJW. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomised trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Jama 2006; 295:1152–1160.

Titel: Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial1)
Beaver K, Tysver-Robinson D, Campbell M, Twomey M, Williamson S, Hindley A, Susnerwala S, Dunn G, Luker K
Auteur: Berry Middel
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2009
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice / Uitgave 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1572-2082
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-8806
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080086

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2009

Journal Club, een goed idee voor implementatie van EBP

Oncologie

Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asympto matic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial

Richtlijn Misselijkheid en braken bij palliatieve patiënten met kanker

Verpleegkundig onderwijs in de palliatieve zorg: “Deze zorg raakt de kern van ons beroep”

Begrippenlijst