Top

Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Gepubliceerd in:

26-02-2024

Cognitive Control and Flexibility to Happiness: Distress Tolerance and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation as Serial Mediators

Auteurs: Seydi Ahmet Satici, Meltem Ozturk, Sinan Okur, M. Engin Deniz

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy | Uitgave 4/2024

Abstract

Happiness is a positive construct that includes individual, interrelated cognitive and emotional components and is the pursuit of human nature. In this study, serial multiple mediation analysis was performed to test the hypothetical model that addresses distress tolerance and difficulties in emotion regulation as serial mediators in the relationship between cognitive control and flexibility, and happiness. The participants were 315 Turkish individuals from 34 cities in Türkiye. The structural equation modeling revealed that both distress tolerance and difficulties in emotion regulation have a full serial mediator role in the relationships between cognitive control and flexibility, and happiness. Limitations and future research suggestions are discussed.

vorige artikel Can REBT Reduce Academic Stress and Increase Adjustment in Rural Students?

volgende artikel Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization

Akbari, M., & Hossaini, S. M. (2018). The relationship of spiritual health with quality of life, mental health, and burnout: The mediating role of emotional regulation. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 13(1), 22–31.PubMedPubMedCentral

Akkuş-Çutuk, Z. (2021). Mediating role of emotion regulation processes in the relationship between cognitive flexibility and intolerance to uncertainty. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 11(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.51865/JESP.2021.2.17.CrossRef

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.CrossRef

Arıcı-Özcan, N. (2019). The mediator role of cognitive flexibility and mindfulness in relationship between perceived stress and distress tolerance among university students. Online Submission, 6(9), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3596983.CrossRef

Arıcı-Özcan, N., Çekici, F., & Arslan, R. (2019). The relationship between resilience and distress tolerance in college students: The mediator role of cognitive flexibility and difficulties in emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.525.CrossRef

Asıcı, E., & İkiz, F. (2015). A pathway to happiness: Cognitive flexibility. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Educational Faculty Journal, 1(35), 191–211.

Bardeen, J. R., Tull, M. T., Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Stevens, E. N., & Gratz, K. L. (2014). Attentional control as a moderator of the relationship between difficulties accessing effective emotion regulation strategies and distress tolerance. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9433-2.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMed

Cañas, J., Quesada, J., Antolí, A., & Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46(5), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000061640.CrossRefPubMed

Cañas, J. J., Fajardo, I., & Salmeron, L. (2006). Cognitive flexibility. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 1(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4439.6326.CrossRef

Demirtaş, A. S. (2019). Cognitive control and cognitive flexibility in the context of stress: A scale adaptation. Studies in Psychology, 39(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0028.CrossRef

Demirtaş, A. S. (2020). Optimism and happiness in undergraduate students: Cognitive flexibility and adjustment to university life as mediators. Anales De Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(2), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.381181.CrossRef

Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. V. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4.CrossRef

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.CrossRefPubMed

Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415.CrossRefPubMed

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.CrossRefPubMed

Dilmaç, B., & Yılmaz, M. (2019). The predictive relationship between cognitive awareness levels subjective happiness distress tolerance in teacher candidates. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 1125–1155. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.520293.CrossRef

Doğan, T., & Çötok, N. A. (2011). Adaptation of the short form of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(36), 165–172.

Ebert, D., & Ebmeier, K. P. (1998). New models for depression. Karger Publishers.

Field, A. (2016). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

Gabrys, R. L., Tabri, N., Anisman, H., & Matheson, K. (2018). Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: The Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02219.CrossRef

Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4.CrossRef

Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00213-6.CrossRef

Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, & applications (pp. 158–176). SAGE.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Jeffries, E. R., McLeish, A. C., Kraemer, K. M., Avallone, K. M., & Fleming, J. B. (2016). The role of distress tolerance in the use of specific emotion regulation strategies. Behavior Modification, 40(3), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515619596.CrossRefPubMed

Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping, and symptomatology in psychotherapy [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Retrieved from https://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/354.

Koster, E. H. W., Hoorelbeke, K., Onraedt, T., Owens, M., & Derakshan, N. (2017). Cognitive control interventions for depression: A systematic review of findings from training studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 53, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.02.002.CrossRefPubMed

Kryza-Lacombe, M., Tanzini, E., Yali, A. M., & O’Neill, S. (2021). Executive functioning and the pursuit of happiness. Learning and Motivation, 76, 101758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101758.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lantrip, C., Isquith, P. K., Koven, N. S., Welsh, K., & Roth, R. M. (2015). Executive function and emotion regulation strategy use in adolescents. Applied Neuropsychology Child, 5(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2014.960567.CrossRefPubMed

Lathabhavan, R., & Lathabhavan, R. (2022). Psychological capital and anxiety: a study among Gen Z job seekers. Journal of Social and Educational Research, 1(1), 21–26. Retrieved from https://www.journalser.com/jser/article/view/10.

Laureiro-Martínez, D., & Brusoni, S. (2018). Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision‐making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1031–1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2774.CrossRef

Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37(9), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.37.9.1019.CrossRef

Le, T. P., Iwamoto, D. K., & Burke, L. A. (2021). A longitudinal investigation of racial discrimination, distress intolerance, and psychological well-being in African American college students. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23054.CrossRefPubMed

Lewis, G. J., Kanai, R., Rees, G., & Bates, T. C. (2014). Neural correlates of the ‘good life’: Eudaimonic well-being is associated with insular cortex volume. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst032.CrossRefPubMed

Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRef

Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational process in well-being. American Psychologist, 56(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.239.CrossRefPubMed

Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. Penguin Press.

Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.CrossRef

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Morton, J. B., Ezekiel, F., & Wilk, H. A. (2011). Cognitive control: Easy to identify but hard to define. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01139.x.CrossRefPubMed

Murillo-Deglane, M. G. (2018). Intrinsic happiness: The seed inside each person. Revista De Psicología, 6(1), 121–128.

Nasser-Abu Alhija, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2006). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling strategies on parameter estimates and their standard errors in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_3.CrossRef

Ott, J. (2020). Cognitive happiness, or the cognitive component of happiness. In: Beyond economics: happiness as a standart in our personal life and in politics (pp. 45–60). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56600-5_4.

Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038648.CrossRefPubMed

Sargın, A. E., Özdel, K., Utku, Ç., Kuru, E., Alkar, Ö. Y., & Türkçapar, M. H. (2012). Distress tolerance scale: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 1(3), 152–161.

Satıcı, B., & Deniz, M. E. (2020). Modeling emotion regulation and subjective happiness: Smartphone addiction as a mediator. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 7(3), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.5152/addicta.2020.20035.CrossRef

Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., Uono, S., Kubota, Y., Sawada, R., Yoshimura, S., & Toichi, M. (2015). The structural neural substrate of subjective happiness. Scientific Reports, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16891.

Sheykholeslami, A., Kiani, A. R., Sh, A., & Soleimani, E. (2016). On the prediction of tendency to drug use based on behavioral activation and inhibition systems, cognitive flexibility, and distress tolerance among students. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 10(39), 109–128.

Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005). The distress tolerance scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 29(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-005-7955-3.CrossRef

Talevi, D., & Rossi, A. (2019). The link between happiness and psychopathology. Journal of Psychopathology, 25, 49–50.

Webb, T. L., Lindquist, K. A., Jones, K., Avishai, A., & Sheeran, P. (2018). Situation selection is a particularly effective emotion regulation strategy for people who need help regulating their emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 32(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1295922.CrossRef

Yang, C., Nay, S., & Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Three approaches to using lengthy ordinal scales in structural equation models: Parceling, latent scoring, and shortening scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609338592.CrossRefPubMed

Yiğit, İ., & Guzey Yiğit, M. (2017). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of difficulties in emotion regulation scale-brief form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38, 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9712-7.CrossRef

Zvolensky, M. J., Leyro, T. M., Bernstein, A., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2011). Historical perspectives, theory, and measurement of distress tolerance. In M. J. Zvolensky, A. Bernstein, & A. A. Vujanovic (Eds.), Distress tolerance: Theory, resarch and clinical applications (pp. 3–27). The Guilford Press.

Titel: Cognitive Control and Flexibility to Happiness: Distress Tolerance and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation as Serial Mediators
Auteurs: Seydi Ahmet Satici
Meltem Ozturk
Sinan Okur
M. Engin Deniz
Publicatiedatum: 26-02-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy / Uitgave 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0894-9085
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6563
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-024-00540-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2024

Mediating Effects of Resilience Between Mindfulness, Self-compassion, and Psychological Distress in a Longitudinal Study

Open Access

Metacognitive Awareness as the Predictor of Positive Self-Critical Rumination, Personal Best Goals (PBs), and Language Achievement

The Role of Desire Thinking and Craving in Problematic Smartphone Use

Open Access

Mindfulness and Well-being: A Longitudinal Serial Mediation Model of Psychological Adjustment and COVID-19 Fear

Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization

When the Dark Employee Takes an Irrational Turn: Exploring the Intersection of Dark Personality Traits and Work-Related Beliefs

Open Access