Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
To investigate the systematic differences in the self-reporting and valuation of overall health and, in particular, pain/discomfort between three countries (England/UK, Japan, and Spain) on the EQ-5D.
Existing datasets were used to explore differences in responses on the EQ-5D descriptive system between Japan (3L and 5L), the UK (3L), England (5L), and Spain (5L), particularly on the dimension of pain/discomfort. The role of different EQ dimensions in determining self-reported overall health scores for the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was investigated using ordinary least squares regression. Time trade-off (TTO) results from Japanese and UK respondents for the EQ-5D-3L as well as Japanese and English respondents for the EQ-5D-5L were compared using t tests.
For the EQ-5D-3L, a higher percentage of respondents in Japan than in the UK reported ‘no pain/discomfort’ (81.6 vs 67.0%, respectively); for the EQ-5D-5L, the proportions were 79.2% in Spain, 73.2% in Japan, and 63–64% in England, after adjusting for age differences in samples. The ‘pain/discomfort’ dimension had the largest impact on respondents’ self-reported EQ-VAS only for EQ-5D-3L in Japan. Using the EQ-5D-3L, Japanese respondents were considerably less willing to trade off time to avoid pain/discomfort than the UK respondents; for example, moving from health state, 11121 (some problems with pain/discomfort) to 11131 (extreme pain/discomfort) represented a decrement of 0.65 on the observed TTO value in the UK compared with 0.15 in Japan. Using the EQ-5D-5L, Japanese respondents were also less willing to trade off time to avoid pain/discomfort than respondents in England; however, the difference in values was much smaller than that observed using EQ-5D-3L data.
This study provides evidence of between-country differences in the self-reporting and valuation of health, including pain/discomfort, when using EQ-5D in general population samples. The results suggest a need for caution when comparing or aggregating EQ-5D self-reported data in multi-country studies.
Kind, P., Brooks, R., Rabin, R., & SpringerLink (2005). EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef
Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 23(2), 129–138. PubMed
Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Bottomley, A., Aaronson, N. K., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., Koller, M., Petersen, M. A., Sprangers, M. A., & EORTC and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis, G. (2006). Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses. Quality of Life Research, 15(6), 1103–1115; discussion 1117–1120. CrossRefPubMed
Stewart, A. L., & Napoles-Springer, A. (2000). Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl), II102–I124. PubMed
Konig, H. H., Heider, D., Lehnert, T., Riedel-Heller, S. G., Angermeyer, M. C., Matschinger, H., Vilagut, G., Bruffaerts, R., Haro, J. M., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Kovess, V., Alonso, J., & investigators, E. S. M. (2010). Health status of the advanced elderly in six European countries: Results from a representative survey using EQ-5D and SF-12. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 143. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Szende, A., Devlin, N., Oppe, M., & SpringerLink (2007). EQ-5D value sets inventory, comparative review and user guide, EuroQol group monographs 2. Dordrecht: Springer.
Devlin, N., Shah, K., Feng, Y., Mulhern, B., & van Hout, B. (2016). Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England, London: Office of Health Economics Research Paper 16/01.
Ikeda, S., Shiroiwa, T., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Fukuda, T., Saito, S., & Shimozuma, K. (2015). Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 64(1), 47–55.
Ramos-Goni, J. M., Pinto-Prades, J. L., Oppe, M., Cabases, J. M., Serrano-Aguilar, P., & Rivero-Arias, O. (2014). Valuation and modeling of EQ-5D-5L health states using a hybrid approach. Medical Care, 1–8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000283
Shirado, O., Doi, T., Akai, M., Fujino, K., Hoshino, Y., & Iwaya, T. (2007). An outcome measure for Japanese people with chronic low back pain: An introduction and validation study of Japan Low Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 32(26), 3052–3059. CrossRef
Tsang, A., Von Korff, M., Lee, S., Alonso, J., Karam, E., Angermeyer, M. C., Borges, G. L., Bromet, E. J., Demytteneare, K., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Gureje, O., Lepine, J. P., Haro, J. M., Levinson, D., Oakley Browne, M. A., Posada-Villa, J., Seedat, S., & Watanabe, M. (2008). Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: Gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. The Journal of Pain, 9(10), 883–891. CrossRefPubMed
Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243–266. CrossRef
Stening, B. W., & Everett, J. E. (1984). Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 122(2), 151–156. CrossRef
Sun, S., Chen, J., Kind, P., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., & Burström, K. Experience-based VAS values for EQ-5D-3L health states in a national general population health survey in China (2015). Quality of Life Research, 24(3), 693–703.
- An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D
Floortje van Nooten
Nancy J. Devlin
- Springer International Publishing