Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1757-1146-2-15) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
CPV designed the study, interpreted the results, wrote the paper and prepared the final draft.
JV contributed to the study design, analyzed the data, interpreted the results and approved the final draft.
Application of plane geometry to the study of bunion deformity may represent an interesting and novel approach in the research field of hallux valgus. For the purpose of contributing to development of a different perspective in the assessment of hallux valgus, this study was conducted with three objectives: a) to determine the position on the intersection point of the perpendicular bisectors of the longitudinal axes of the first metatarsal and proximal phalanx (IP), b) to correlate the location of this point with hallux valgus deformity according to angular measurements and according to visual assessment of the severity carried out by three independent observers, and c) to assess whether this IP correlated with the radius of the first metatarsophalangeal arc circumference.
Measurements evaluated were intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), and proximal phalangeal articular angle (PPAA). The Autocad® program computed the location of the IP inside or outside of the foot. Three independent observers rated the severity of hallux valgus in photographs using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
Measurements of all angles except PPAA showed significantly lower values when the IP was located out of the foot more distantly and vice versa, significantly higher values for severe deformities in which the IP was found inside the foot (p < 0.001). The IP correlated significantly with VAS scores and with the length of the radius of the circle that included the first metatarsophalangeal arc circumference (p < 0.001)
The IP is a useful indicator of hallux valgus deformity because correlated significantly with IMA and HVA measurements, VAS scores obtained by visual inspection of the degree of deformity, and location of the center of the first metatarsophalangeal arc circumference.
Authors’ original file for figure 113047_2009_89_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 213047_2009_89_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 313047_2009_89_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 413047_2009_89_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 513047_2009_89_MOESM5_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 613047_2009_89_MOESM6_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 713047_2009_89_MOESM7_ESM.jpeg
Coetzee JC, Resig SG, Kuskowski M, Saleh KJ: The Lapidus procedure as salvage after failed surgical treatment of hallux valgus. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86-A (Suppl 1): 30-36. PubMed
Gould JS, Ali S, Fowler R, Fleisig GS: Anchor enhanced capsulorraphy in bunionectomies using an L-shaped capsulotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2003, 24: 61-66. PubMed
Pique-Vidal C, Maled-Garcia I, Arabi-Moreno J, Vila J: Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program. Foot Ankle Int. 2006, 27: 175-180. PubMed
Nery C, Barroco R, Ressio C: Biplanar chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2002, 23: 792-798. PubMed
Kilmartin TE, Barrington RL, Wallace WA: Metatarsus primus varus. A statistical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991, 73: 937-940. PubMed
Menz HB, Munteanu SE: Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005, 44: 1061-1066. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh687. CrossRef
Panchbhavi VK, Trevino S: Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2004, 25: 708-711. PubMed
Panchbhavi VK, Trevino S: Evaluation of hallux valgus surgery using computer-assisted radiographic measurements and two direct forefoot parameters. Foot Ankle Surg. 2004, 10: 59-63. 10.1016/j.fas.2004.02.001. CrossRef
Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Kumai T, Samoto N, Tamai S: Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus. A two-dimensional coordinate system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995, 77 (2): 205-213. PubMed
Hardy R, Clapham J: Observations on hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951, 33: 376-391. PubMed
Coughlin MJ: Hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996, 78 (6): 932-966. PubMed
Coughlin MJ, Freund E: Roger A. Mann Award. The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2001, 22 (5): 369-379. PubMed
Gottschalk FA, Solomon L, Beighton PH: The prevalence of hallux valgus in South African males. S Afr Med J. 1984, 65 (18): 725-726. PubMed
- A geometric analysis of hallux valgus: correlation with clinical assessment of severity
- BioMed Central