Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Sources of support: Data collection was supported by grant R01 CA 60068 (Cella). Support for these analyses for Drs. Crane and Gibbons and Ms. Narasimhalu was provided by grant K08 AG 022232 from the National Institute on Aging (Crane). Dr. Gibbons was also supported by grant P50 AG 05136 from the National Institute on Aging (Murray Raskind). Dr. Teresi was supported by the Columbia University Resource Center for Minority Aging Research (AG 15294) and the Statistical Coordinating Center for the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), NIH Roadmap Project (AR 052177). Dr. Hays was also supported by the UCLA/DREW Project EXPORT, National Institutes of Health, National Center on Health & Health Disparities (P20-MD00148-01), and the UCLA Center for Health Improvement in Minority Elders/Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (AG-02-004).
Several techniques have been developed to detect differential item functioning (DIF), including ordinal logistic regression (OLR). This study compared different criteria for determining whether items have DIF using OLR.
To compare and contrast findings from three different sets of criteria for detecting DIF using OLR. General distress and physical functioning items were evaluated for DIF related to five covariates: age, marital status, gender, race, and Hispanic origin.
1,714 patients with cancer or HIV/AIDS.
A total of 23 items addressing physical functioning and 15 items addressing general distress were selected from a pool of 154 items from four different health-related quality of life questionnaires.
The three sets of criteria produced qualitatively and quantitatively different results. Criteria based on statistical significance alone detected DIF in almost all the items, while alternative criteria based on magnitude detected DIF in far fewer items. Accounting for DIF by using demographic-group specific item parameters had negligible effects on individual scores, except for race.
Specific criteria chosen to determine whether items have DIF have an impact on the findings. Criteria based entirely on statistical significance may detect small differences that are clinically negligible.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Hahn, E. A., Holzner, B., Kemmler, G., Sperner-Unterweger, B., Hudgens, S. A., & Cella, D. (2005). Cross-cultural evaluation of health status using item response theory: FACT-B comparisons between Austrian and U.S. patients with breast cancer. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 28, 233–259. CrossRef
Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 28, 212–232. CrossRef
Roorda, L. D., Jones, C. A., Waltz, M., Lankhorst, G. J., Bouter, L. M., van der Eijken, J. W., Willems, W. J., Heyligers, I. C., Voaklander, D. C., Kelly, K. D., & Suarez-Almazor, M. E. (2004). Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63, 36–42. PubMedCrossRef
Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Millsap, R. E., & Everson, H. T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297–334. CrossRef
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361–370. CrossRef
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
Gelin, M. N., & Zumbo, B. D. (2003). Differential item functioning results may change depending on how an item is scored: An illustration with Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 63, 65–74. CrossRef
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., & de Haes, J. C., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376. PubMedCrossRef
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579. PubMed
Cella, D. F., & Bonomi, A. E. (1995). Measuring quality of life: 1995 update. Oncology (Williston Park), 9, 47–60.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. CrossRef
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Muraki, E., & Bock, D. (2003). PARSCALE for Windows. Chicago: SSI. Version 4.1.
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. NY: Springer.
Samejima F. (1969) Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph No. 17.
StataCorp. (2003). Stata statistical software: release 8.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
McCullagh P., & Nelder, J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.
Maldonado, G., & Greenland, S. (1993). Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138, 923–936. PubMed
Eton, D. T., Cella, D., Yost, K. J., Yount, S. E., Peterman, A. H., Neuberg, D. S., Sledge, G. W., & Wood, W. C. (2004). A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 898–910. PubMedCrossRef
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Shealy, R. T., & Stout, W. F. (1993). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression
Paul K. Crane
Laura E. Gibbons
Ron D. Hays
Jeanne A. Teresi
- Springer Netherlands