Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander hoofdstuk

2008 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

5 Kritisch beoordelen van een artikel: secundair onderzoek

Auteurs: Prof. dr. M. Offringa, Prof. dr. W.J.J. Assendelft, Dr. R.J.P.M. Scholten

Gepubliceerd in: Inleiding in evidence-based medicine

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Zoals in hoofdstuk 3 is uitgelegd, is het een goede gewoonte en erg efficiënt bij een nog onbeantwoorde vraag uit de praktijk eerst te zoeken naar geaggregeerde evidence, ofwel systematische reviews (secundair onderzoek).
Voetnoten
1
Voor een goed begrip van deze paragraaf dient paragraaf 4.​4 bestudeerd te zijn.
 
2
Voor een goed begrip van dit hoofdstuk dienen de paragrafen 4.​2 en 5.2 bestudeerd te zijn.
 
3
Voor een goed begrip van deze paragraaf dienen de paragrafen 4.​3, 4.​5 en 5.2 bestudeerd te zijn.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM, Hoving JL, Offringa M, Bouter LM. De praktijk van systematische reviews. VIII. Zoeken en beoordelen van systematische reviews. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145:1625-31. Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM, Hoving JL, Offringa M, Bouter LM. De praktijk van systematische reviews. VIII. Zoeken en beoordelen van systematische reviews. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145:1625-31.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Londen: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Londen: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (red.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 [geraadpleegd op 29 februari 2008]. Beschikbaar op www.​cochrane-handbook.​org. Higgins JPT, Green S (red.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 [geraadpleegd op 29 februari 2008]. Beschikbaar op www.​cochrane-handbook.​org.
go back to reference Kahn KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. Londen: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, 2003. Kahn KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. Londen: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, 2003.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Londen: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Londen: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (red.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 [geraadpleegd op 29 februari 2008]. Beschikbaar op www.​cochrane-handbook.​org.​. Higgins JPT, Green S (red.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 [geraadpleegd op 29 februari 2008]. Beschikbaar op www.​cochrane-handbook.​org.​.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Browman GP. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:1411-6.. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Browman GP. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:1411-6..
go back to reference Kahn KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. Londen: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, 2003.. Kahn KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. Londen: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, 2003..
go back to reference Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 2005;330:68. Epub 2004 Dec 24.. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 2005;330:68. Epub 2004 Dec 24..
go back to reference Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS ONE, 2007;2:e1350.. Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS ONE, 2007;2:e1350..
go back to reference Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10..
go back to reference Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 2001;323:101-5.. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 2001;323:101-5..
go back to reference Tulder M van, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003;28:1290-9. Tulder M van, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003;28:1290-9.
go back to reference Buntinx F, Aertgeerts B, Macaskill P. Guidelines for conducting systematic reviews of studies evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests. In: Knottnerus A, Buntinx F (eds). The evidence base of clinical diagnosis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Publ: in press. Buntinx F, Aertgeerts B, Macaskill P. Guidelines for conducting systematic reviews of studies evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests. In: Knottnerus A, Buntinx F (eds). The evidence base of clinical diagnosis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Publ: in press.
go back to reference Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323:157-62. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323:157-62.
go back to reference Gatsonis C, Paliwal P. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:271-81. Gatsonis C, Paliwal P. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:271-81.
go back to reference Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne JA. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics 2007;8:239-51. Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne JA. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics 2007;8:239-51.
go back to reference Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:119-30. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:119-30.
go back to reference Leeflang M, Reitsma J, Scholten R, Rutjes A, Di Nisio M, Deeks J, Bossuyt P. Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem 2007;53:164-72. Leeflang M, Reitsma J, Scholten R, Rutjes A, Di Nisio M, Deeks J, Bossuyt P. Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem 2007;53:164-72.
go back to reference Leeflang MM, Scholten RJ, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:234-40. Leeflang MM, Scholten RJ, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:234-40.
go back to reference Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, Meulen JHP van der, Bossuyt JMM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, Meulen JHP van der, Bossuyt JMM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.
go back to reference Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiology 2005;58:982-90. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiology 2005;58:982-90.
go back to reference Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003;3:25. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003;3:25.
go back to reference Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Int Med 2004;140:189-202. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Int Med 2004;140:189-202.
go back to reference Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med 2008 Feb 28;27:687-97. Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Stat Med 2008 Feb 28;27:687-97.
go back to reference Altman DG. Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ 2001;323:224-8. Altman DG. Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ 2001;323:224-8.
go back to reference Chou R, Helfand M. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:1090-9. Chou R, Helfand M. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:1090-9.
go back to reference Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 1998;316:410-4. Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 1998;316:410-4.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M. Systematic reviews of observational studies. In Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (red). Systematic reviews in health care, meta-analysis in context. Londen: BMJ Books, 2000:211-27. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M. Systematic reviews of observational studies. In Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (red). Systematic reviews in health care, meta-analysis in context. Londen: BMJ Books, 2000:211-27.
go back to reference Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JPT. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility for bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:666-76. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JPT. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility for bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:666-76.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
go back to reference Windt DAWM van der, Zeegers MPA, Kemper HCG, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM. De praktijk van systematische reviews. VI. Zoeken, selecteren en methodologisch beoordelen van etiologisch onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000;144:1210-4. Windt DAWM van der, Zeegers MPA, Kemper HCG, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM. De praktijk van systematische reviews. VI. Zoeken, selecteren en methodologisch beoordelen van etiologisch onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000;144:1210-4.
go back to reference Zeegers MPA, Heisterkamp SH, Kostense PJ, Windt DAWM van der, Scholten RJPM. De praktijk van systematische reviews VII. Het combineren van resultaten uit observationeel onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000;144:1393-7. Zeegers MPA, Heisterkamp SH, Kostense PJ, Windt DAWM van der, Scholten RJPM. De praktijk van systematische reviews VII. Het combineren van resultaten uit observationeel onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000;144:1393-7.
Metagegevens
Titel
5 Kritisch beoordelen van een artikel: secundair onderzoek
Auteurs
Prof. dr. M. Offringa
Prof. dr. W.J.J. Assendelft
Dr. R.J.P.M. Scholten
Copyright
2008
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6636-1_5