Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander hoofdstuk

2008 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

4 Kritisch beoordelen van een artikel

Auteurs: Prof. dr. M. Offringa, Prof. dr. W.J.J. Assendelft, Dr. R.J.P.M. Scholten

Gepubliceerd in: Inleiding in evidence-based medicine

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Na het stellen van een goed geformuleerde klinische vraag en na toepassing van een daarop toegesneden zoekactie hebben we de informatie getraceerd waarin het antwoord op deze vraag mogelijk ligt opgesloten.
Voetnoten
1
Voor een goed begrip van deze paragraaf dienen de paragrafen 4.2 tot en met 4.5 bestudeerd te zijn.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:40-4. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:40-4.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ 2006;332:1089-92. Bossuyt PM, Irwig L, Craig J, Glasziou P. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ 2006;332:1089-92.
go back to reference Bruel A van den, Cleemput I, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Buntinx F. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1116-22. Bruel A van den, Cleemput I, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Buntinx F. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1116-22.
go back to reference Knottnerus JA, ed. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis. Londen: BMJ Publishing Group, 2002. Knottnerus JA, ed. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis. Londen: BMJ Publishing Group, 2002.
go back to reference Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 3. Diagnosis and screening. Third edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 3. Diagnosis and screening. Third edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
go back to reference Users’ Guides to EBP. Centre for Health Evidence [geraadpleegd op 29 februari 2008]. Beschikbaar op website www.cche.net/usersguides/main.asp Users’ Guides to EBP. Centre for Health Evidence [geraadpleegd op 29 februari 2008]. Beschikbaar op website www.cche.net/usersguides/main.asp
go back to reference Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:25. Kosteloos beschikbaar op website www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2288/​3/​25 Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:25. Kosteloos beschikbaar op website www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2288/​3/​25
go back to reference Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP for the STROBE initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-7. Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP for the STROBE initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-7.
go back to reference Hemingway H. Prognosis research: Why is Dr. Lydgate still waiting? J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1229-38. Hemingway H. Prognosis research: Why is Dr. Lydgate still waiting? J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1229-38.
go back to reference Levine MN, Browman GP, Gent M, Roberts R, Goodyear M. When is a prognostic factor useful?: a guide for the perplexed. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:348-56. Levine MN, Browman GP, Gent M, Roberts R, Goodyear M. When is a prognostic factor useful?: a guide for the perplexed. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:348-56.
go back to reference McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM for the statistics subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC working group on cancer diagnostics. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Can 2005;93:387-91. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM for the statistics subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC working group on cancer diagnostics. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Can 2005;93:387-91.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357(9263):1191-4. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357(9263):1191-4.
go back to reference Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:663-94. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:663-94.
go back to reference Elbourne DR, Campbell MK. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. Stat Med 2001;20:489-96. Elbourne DR, Campbell MK. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. Stat Med 2001;20:489-96.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4.
go back to reference Schuling J, Toenders WGM. Evidence-based medicine: betekenis voor de farmacotherapie. Geneesmiddelen Bull 1999;33:71-7. Schuling J, Toenders WGM. Evidence-based medicine: betekenis voor de farmacotherapie. Geneesmiddelen Bull 1999;33:71-7.
go back to reference Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 5 Therapy. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 5 Therapy. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
go back to reference Bijl D, Grobbee DE. Het patiënt-controleonderzoek. Geneesmiddelenbulletin 1999:33:127-34. Bijl D, Grobbee DE. Het patiënt-controleonderzoek. Geneesmiddelenbulletin 1999:33:127-34.
go back to reference Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295-300. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295-300.
go back to reference Kelly WN, et al. Guidelines for submitting adverse event reports for publication. Drug Safety 2007;30 (5):367-73. Kelly WN, et al. Guidelines for submitting adverse event reports for publication. Drug Safety 2007;30 (5):367-73.
go back to reference Stehouwer CDA. Rapportage van observationeel onderzoek: nuttige en welkome aanbevelingen ter verbetering. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:182-4. Stehouwer CDA. Rapportage van observationeel onderzoek: nuttige en welkome aanbevelingen ter verbetering. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:182-4.
go back to reference Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 6 Harm. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 6 Harm. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
go back to reference Talbot JCC, Stephens MDB. Clinical trials; Collection of safety data and establishing the adverse reaction profile. In: Talbot JCC, Waller P (eds). Stephens’ detection of new adverse drug reactions. Chichester: Wiley, 2004:167-233. Talbot JCC, Stephens MDB. Clinical trials; Collection of safety data and establishing the adverse reaction profile. In: Talbot JCC, Waller P (eds). Stephens’ detection of new adverse drug reactions. Chichester: Wiley, 2004:167-233.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP. Het belang van medische casuïstiek te midden van ‘evidence-based’ geneeskunde en moleculaire verklaringen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002;146:1699-703. Vandenbroucke JP. Het belang van medische casuïstiek te midden van ‘evidence-based’ geneeskunde en moleculaire verklaringen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002;146:1699-703.
go back to reference Barratt A, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. JAMA 1999;281:2029-34. Barratt A, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature. XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. JAMA 1999;281:2029-34.
go back to reference Day NE. The theoretical basis for cancer screening. Cancer Treat Res 1996;86:9-24. Day NE. The theoretical basis for cancer screening. Cancer Treat Res 1996;86:9-24.
go back to reference Klaveren RJ van, Oudkerk M, Mali WThM, Koning HJ de. Screenen op longkanker met de multidetector-CT: voorlopig nog af te raden. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:125-8. Klaveren RJ van, Oudkerk M, Mali WThM, Koning HJ de. Screenen op longkanker met de multidetector-CT: voorlopig nog af te raden. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:125-8.
go back to reference Rosser WW, Shaffir MS. Evidence-based family practice. Hamilton: Decker, 1998. Rosser WW, Shaffir MS. Evidence-based family practice. Hamilton: Decker, 1998.
go back to reference Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 3 Diagnosis and screening. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 3 Diagnosis and screening. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
go back to reference Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Paper no 34. Genève: WHO, 1968. Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Paper no 34. Genève: WHO, 1968.
go back to reference Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.
go back to reference Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985;38:27-36. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985;38:27-36.
go back to reference Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 2002;11:193-205. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 2002;11:193-205.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR de, Windt DAWM van der, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, Vet HCW de. Quality criteria for clinimetric studies of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR de, Windt DAWM van der, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, Vet HCW de. Quality criteria for clinimetric studies of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
go back to reference Vet HCW de, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1137-41. Vet HCW de, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1137-41.
go back to reference Vet HCW de, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033-9. Vet HCW de, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033-9.
Metagegevens
Titel
4 Kritisch beoordelen van een artikel
Auteurs
Prof. dr. M. Offringa
Prof. dr. W.J.J. Assendelft
Dr. R.J.P.M. Scholten
Copyright
2008
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6636-1_4