Skip to main content
Top

20-04-2024

What facets of physical function are most important to adults diagnosed with cancer?

Auteurs: Theresa Coles, Kate Plyler, Alexy Hernandez, Rebecca Fillipo, Debra M. Henke, Cara Arizmendi, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan, C. Rory Goodwin, Thomas W. LeBlanc, Erica G. Horodniceanu, Vishal Bhatnagar, Bryce B. Reeve, Kevin P. Weinfurt

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Successful patient-focused drug development involves selecting and measuring outcomes in clinical trials that are important to patients. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration’s definition of clinical benefit includes how patients feel, function, or survive. Patients are considered the experts in describing how they feel and function. In cancer trials, patient-reported measures of physical function provide insight into how patients function at baseline, benefit from the interventions being studied, and the impact of treatment side effects. We conducted a qualitative study with adults diagnosed with cancer to describe facets of physical function from their perspective and to identify which facets are most important to this patient population.

Methods

Using concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing techniques, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 72 adults ≥ 22 years of age with cancer who received treatment with an anticancer drug or biologic within six months of the interview. We selected participants using purposive sampling with the aim to elicit diverse experiences regarding how they may interpret and respond to questions related to physical function. Participants were presented with patient-reported outcome (PRO) items representative of PRO measures used in cancer and general populations.

Results

Five facets of how physical function relates to activities were defined from the patient perspective: ability, difficulty, limitation, satisfaction, and completion. More than half of the participants indicated that ability was the most important facet of physical function. The next most important were satisfaction (18.3%), limitation (14.1%), difficulty (5.6%), and completion (2.8%).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that we must be more specific about the facets of physical function that we set out to assess when we use PRO measures to describe the patient experience. These results have implications for the specificity of physical function facets when measured in cancer clinical trials.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
4.
go back to reference Kluetz, P. G., Slagle, A., Papadopoulos, E. J., Johnson, L. L., Donoghue, M., Kwitkowski, V. E., Chen, W. H., Sridhara, R., Farrell, A. T., Keegan, P., Kim, G., & Pazdur, R. (2016). Focusing on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: Symptomatic adverse events, physical function, and disease-related symptoms. Clinical Cancer Research : An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 22, 1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2035CrossRefPubMed Kluetz, P. G., Slagle, A., Papadopoulos, E. J., Johnson, L. L., Donoghue, M., Kwitkowski, V. E., Chen, W. H., Sridhara, R., Farrell, A. T., Keegan, P., Kim, G., & Pazdur, R. (2016). Focusing on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: Symptomatic adverse events, physical function, and disease-related symptoms. Clinical Cancer Research : An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 22, 1553–1558. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-15-2035CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., Devellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J. F., Gershon, R., Hahn, E. A., Lai, J. S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., … Hays, R. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., Devellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J. F., Gershon, R., Hahn, E. A., Lai, J. S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., … Hays, R. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2010.​04.​011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Coles, T., Fillipo, R., Plyler, K., Hernandez, A., Henke, D., Arizmendi, C., Cantrell, S., Lagoo-Deenadayalan, S., Goodwin, C. R., LeBlanc, T. W., Horodniceanu, E. G., Bhatnagar, V., Reeve, B. B., & Weinfurt, K. (2024) Facets of Physical Function Assessed by Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology research. Accepted for publication in Quality of Life Research February 2024. Coles, T., Fillipo, R., Plyler, K., Hernandez, A., Henke, D., Arizmendi, C., Cantrell, S., Lagoo-Deenadayalan, S., Goodwin, C. R., LeBlanc, T. W., Horodniceanu, E. G., Bhatnagar, V., Reeve, B. B., & Weinfurt, K. (2024) Facets of Physical Function Assessed by Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology research. Accepted for publication in Quality of Life Research February 2024.
14.
go back to reference Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011). Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011). Content validity—establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1—eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​014CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). SAGE Publications Inc. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). SAGE Publications Inc.
17.
go back to reference Oken, M. M., Creech, R. H., Tormey, D. C., Horton, J., Davis, T. E., McFadden, E. T., & Carbone, P. P. (1982). Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology, 5(6), 649–655.CrossRefPubMed Oken, M. M., Creech, R. H., Tormey, D. C., Horton, J., Davis, T. E., McFadden, E. T., & Carbone, P. P. (1982). Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology, 5(6), 649–655.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRef Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Willis, G. (2015). Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. Oxford University Press. Willis, G. (2015). Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. Oxford University Press.
24.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., de Haes, J. C., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365CrossRefPubMed Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., de Haes, J. C., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​jnci/​85.​5.​365CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.CrossRefPubMed Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jette, A. M., Davies, A. R., Cleary, P. D., Calkins, D. R., Rubenstein, L. V., Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Young, R. T., Brook, R. H., & Delbanco, T. L. (1986). The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02602324CrossRefPubMed Jette, A. M., Davies, A. R., Cleary, P. D., Calkins, D. R., Rubenstein, L. V., Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Young, R. T., Brook, R. H., & Delbanco, T. L. (1986). The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1(3), 143–149. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​bf02602324CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
What facets of physical function are most important to adults diagnosed with cancer?
Auteurs
Theresa Coles
Kate Plyler
Alexy Hernandez
Rebecca Fillipo
Debra M. Henke
Cara Arizmendi
Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan
C. Rory Goodwin
Thomas W. LeBlanc
Erica G. Horodniceanu
Vishal Bhatnagar
Bryce B. Reeve
Kevin P. Weinfurt
Publicatiedatum
20-04-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03654-8