Skip to main content
Top

21-02-2024

Utility of Multiple Specifiers for Subtyping Oppositional Defiant Problems: Investigating Multiple Psychopathy Dimensions as Specifiers

Auteur: Mojtaba Elhami Athar

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Past research has speculated that using grandiose-manipulative (GM) and daring-impulsive (DI) traits, rather than solely callous-unemotional (CU) traits, could better inform subtyping youths with behavioral problems. However, this approach remains largely untested. To further enhance our understanding of this matter, the current study utilized self-report (n = 2,381) and parent-report (n = 1,846) data to examine the utility of three psychopathic dimensions as specifiers for oppositional defiant problems (ODP). Findings showed that ODP was a significant predictor of negative outcomes, while the GM, CU, and DI traits emerged as significant predictors of theoretically and clinically relevant external variables (e.g., conduct problems and proactive aggression), independent of ODP (and age, gender, and socioeconomic status), forming the potential foundation for the development of specifiers for ODP. Furthermore, children presenting ODP alongside heightened levels of the three psychopathic traits demonstrated notably higher scores in important external variables compared to other groups, including but not confined to the subgroup of children with ODP and high CU trait levels. Findings provide preliminary support for employing GM and DI traits as specifiers for ODP. However, more comprehensive evaluations of these specifiers' utility would help inform ongoing discussions before definitively concluding they should be included in diagnostic manuals.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
T-scores above 70 were used as a threshold to identify youths in the clinical range for various YRS scores, including CP (n = 109, 4.58%), ODP (n = 88, 3.70%), ADHD (n = 103, 4.32%), Affective (n = 125, 5.24%), Anxiety (n = 119, 5.00%), and Social (n = 98, 4.11%) Problems (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001). While clinically informative, these clinical range scores were not central to the current study's aims and are presented here in a footnote for potential comparability with future research.
 
2
Across both studies, group categorization and z-score conversions were performed separately for genders to address gender-based ODP and psychopathic trait differences. This led to smaller group sizes, potentially affecting the power to detect distinctions. Therefore, the study only discussed total sample results, with gender-based comparisons in the Supplementary Material. Additionally, analyses were duplicated using a stricter 1.00 SD cut-off, with corresponding results in the Supplementary Material.
 
3
Similar to Study 1, CFAs were performed to assess the factor structure of the measures in this study. Detailed results are available in the Supplementary Material. Internal consistency was also evaluated using McDonald's omega, Cronbach's alpha, and mean inter-item correlation, accessible in Table 7.
 
4
As with the YSR in Study 1, T-scores above 70 were used as a threshold to identify youths in the clinical range for CBCL scores, including CP (n = 90, 4.87%), ODP (n = 104, 5.63%), ADHD (n = 66, 3.57%), Affective (n = 75, 4.06%), Anxiety (n = 95, 5.14%), and Social (n = 87, 4.71%) Problems (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001). These clinical range scores were not central to the current study's aims and are presented here in a footnote for potential comparability with future research.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: child behavior checklist for ages 6–18, teacher’s report form, youth self-report: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children Youth & Families. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: child behavior checklist for ages 6–18, teacher’s report form, youth self-report: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children Youth & Families.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publication.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publication.CrossRef
go back to reference Andershed, H., Colins, O. F., Salekin, R. T., Lordos, A., Kyranides, M. N., & Fanti, K. A. (2018). Callous-unemotional traits only versus the multidimensional psychopathy construct as predictors of various antisocial outcomes during early adolescence. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9659-5CrossRef Andershed, H., Colins, O. F., Salekin, R. T., Lordos, A., Kyranides, M. N., & Fanti, K. A. (2018). Callous-unemotional traits only versus the multidimensional psychopathy construct as predictors of various antisocial outcomes during early adolescence. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 16–25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10862-018-9659-5CrossRef
go back to reference Bellamy, N. A., Salekin, R. T., Makol, B. A., Augenstein, T. M., & De Los Reyes, A. (2023). The Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder – Parent (PSCD-P): Convergent validity, incremental validity, and reactions to unfamiliar peer confederates. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 51(8), 1097–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-023-01056-xCrossRefPubMed Bellamy, N. A., Salekin, R. T., Makol, B. A., Augenstein, T. M., & De Los Reyes, A. (2023). The Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder – Parent (PSCD-P): Convergent validity, incremental validity, and reactions to unfamiliar peer confederates. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 51(8), 1097–1113. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10802-023-01056-xCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.CrossRef Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.CrossRef
go back to reference Colins, O. F., Andershed, H., Frogner, L., Lopez-Romero, L., Veen, V., & Andershed, A. K. (2014). A new measure to assess psychopathic personality in children: The Child problematic traits inventory. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 36(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9385-yCrossRef Colins, O. F., Andershed, H., Frogner, L., Lopez-Romero, L., Veen, V., & Andershed, A. K. (2014). A new measure to assess psychopathic personality in children: The Child problematic traits inventory. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 36(1), 4–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10862-013-9385-yCrossRef
go back to reference Colins, O. F., Andershed, H., Salekin, R. T., & Fanti, K. A. (2018). Comparing different approaches for subtyping children with conduct problems: callous-unemotional traits only versus the multidimensional psychopathy construct. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9653-yCrossRef Colins, O. F., Andershed, H., Salekin, R. T., & Fanti, K. A. (2018). Comparing different approaches for subtyping children with conduct problems: callous-unemotional traits only versus the multidimensional psychopathy construct. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 6–15. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10862-018-9653-yCrossRef
go back to reference Elhami Athar, M., Colins, O. F., Salekin, R. T., Kargary Padar, L., & Heydarian, S. (2024). The Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder (PSCD) in Iranian school-attending adolescents: A multi-informant validation study of the PSCD parent- and youth self-report versions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 106(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2212760CrossRefPubMed Elhami Athar, M., Colins, O. F., Salekin, R. T., Kargary Padar, L., & Heydarian, S. (2024). The Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder (PSCD) in Iranian school-attending adolescents: A multi-informant validation study of the PSCD parent- and youth self-report versions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 106(1), 100–115. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​00223891.​2023.​2212760CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fanti, K. A., Kyranides, M. N., Lordos, A., Colins, O. F., & Andershed, H. (2018). Unique and interactive associations of callous-unemotional traits, impulsivity and grandiosity with child and adolescent conduct disorder symptoms. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9655-9CrossRef Fanti, K. A., Kyranides, M. N., Lordos, A., Colins, O. F., & Andershed, H. (2018). Unique and interactive associations of callous-unemotional traits, impulsivity and grandiosity with child and adolescent conduct disorder symptoms. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment, 40(1), 40–49. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10862-018-9655-9CrossRef
go back to reference Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). Antisocial process screening device (APSD): Technical manual. Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). Antisocial process screening device (APSD): Technical manual.
go back to reference Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033076CrossRefPubMed Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1–57. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0033076CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hyde, L. W., Burt, S. A., Shaw, D. S., Donnellan, M. B., & Forbes, E. E. (2015). Early starting, aggressive, and/or callous–unemotional? Examining the overlap and predictive utility of antisocial behavior subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000029CrossRefPubMed Hyde, L. W., Burt, S. A., Shaw, D. S., Donnellan, M. B., & Forbes, E. E. (2015). Early starting, aggressive, and/or callous–unemotional? Examining the overlap and predictive utility of antisocial behavior subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 329–342. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​abn0000029CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Makol, B. A., Youngstrom, E. A., Racz, S. J., Qasmieh, N., Glenn, L. E., & De Los Reyes, A. (2020). Integrating multiple informants’ reports: How conceptual and measurement models may address long-standing problems in clinical decision-making. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(6), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620924439CrossRef Makol, B. A., Youngstrom, E. A., Racz, S. J., Qasmieh, N., Glenn, L. E., & De Los Reyes, A. (2020). Integrating multiple informants’ reports: How conceptual and measurement models may address long-standing problems in clinical decision-making. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(6), 953–970. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2167702620924439​CrossRef
go back to reference Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171.CrossRefPubMed Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Salekin, R., & Hare, R. (2016). Proposed specifiers for conduct disorder (PSCD) scale. Salekin, R., & Hare, R. (2016). Proposed specifiers for conduct disorder (PSCD) scale.
go back to reference Salekin, R. T., Andershed, H., & Clark, A. P. (2018). Psychopathy in children and adolescents: Assessment and critical questions regarding conceptualization. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 479–508). The Guilford Press. Salekin, R. T., Andershed, H., & Clark, A. P. (2018). Psychopathy in children and adolescents: Assessment and critical questions regarding conceptualization. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 479–508). The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Salekin, R. T., Charles, N. E., Barry, C. T., Hare, R. D., Batky, B. D., Mendez, B., & Neumann, C. S. (2022). Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder (PSCD): Factor structure and psychometric properties in a residential school facility. Psychological Assessment, 34, 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001162CrossRefPubMed Salekin, R. T., Charles, N. E., Barry, C. T., Hare, R. D., Batky, B. D., Mendez, B., & Neumann, C. S. (2022). Proposed Specifiers for Conduct Disorder (PSCD): Factor structure and psychometric properties in a residential school facility. Psychological Assessment, 34, 985–992. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​pas0001162CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2005). Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. Springer Publishing Co. Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2005). Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. Springer Publishing Co.
go back to reference World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Revision) (Vol. 1). World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Revision) (Vol. 1). World Health Organization.
Metagegevens
Titel
Utility of Multiple Specifiers for Subtyping Oppositional Defiant Problems: Investigating Multiple Psychopathy Dimensions as Specifiers
Auteur
Mojtaba Elhami Athar
Publicatiedatum
21-02-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01167-z