Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2008

Open Access 01-09-2008 | Oral presentation

Use of the Oxford Foot Model in clinical practice

Auteurs: Jennifer McCahill, Julie Stebbins, Tim Theologis

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | bijlage 1/2008

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
insite
ZOEKEN

Introduction

The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) [1] has been used routinely in clinical practice to assess foot deformity during gait in our laboratory since 2004. Over this time, 163 patients with various pathologies have been assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the OFM's clinical relevance in defining dynamic foot deformity thereby assisting management decisions in two populations: idiopathic clubfoot and cerebral palsy/hemiplegia.

Methods

Idiopathic Clubfoot – 24 patients (7 female and 17 male, age range 6 to 24 years) have been seen – 12 bilateral, 7 right and 5 left clubfeet for a total of 36 feet. All patients were surgically treated to correct foot deformity at an early age with a posterior-medial release. Ankle range of motion and weight bearing foot posture were assessed in a standardised clinical examination (CE) and compared with foot model kinematics.
Cerebral Palsy – Hemiplegia – 70 patients (34 male and 36 female, age range 6 to 38 years) have been assessed. Six of these subjects were measured bilaterally.

Results

Idiopathic Clubfoot – The findings from the OFM were used to identify the level of foot deformity in order to specify the type of surgery required, justify the type of casting appropriate to correct foot deformity, clarify the source of foot rotation (ie tibial, hindfoot, forefoot), and to corroborate clinical findings. The OFM influenced future management in 45% of the patients seen (Table 1).
Table 1
Results of CE and OFM data
Hindfoot
 
↑ DF
↓ DF
↓ PF
Inversion
Eversion
IR
ER
CE
0
22
7
8
18
4
0
OFM
6
3
5
9
10
23
4
Forefoot
 
↓ DF
Supn (Tib)
Addn (HF)
Addn (Tib)
Abdn (HF)
Abdn (Tib)
 
CE
0
6
0
25
0
0
 
OFM
11
15
11
22
6
3
 
Key: ↓df-inadequate dorsiflexion; ↑df-excessive dorsiflexion; ↓pf-restricted plantarflexion; IR-internal rotation; ER – external rotation; supn (Tib) – supination related to tibia; addn/abdn (HF)-adduction/abduction related to hindfoot; addn/abdn (Tib) – adduction/abduction related to tibia.
The CE and OFM had best agreement in hindfoot plantarflexion and inversion, and forefoot adduction in relation to the tibia. Arch height was increased in 7 feet (cavus) and reduced in 8 feet (planus); clinically cavus was described in 16 feet and planus in 16 feet. Hindfoot internal rotation was present in 64% of feet post-surgically and was the sole cause of forefoot adduction in relation to the tibia in 33% of feet.

Cerebral Palsy – Hemiplegia

The OFM was used to assess dynamic foot motion to define indications and assess the outcome of surgical or orthotic management, Botulinum Toxin treatment and serial casting. The model was also used to monitor the progression of foot deformity, to clarify controversial findings from conventional lower limb kinematics, to determine the level of foot drop, and to corroborate clinical findings. The OFM directly influenced management in 71% of cases. Figure 1 summarises the findings of the foot model in this population.

Conclusion

Understanding the foot's dynamics during gait adds crucial information compared to the CE alone. The information gained from the OFM has become gradually more influential in the decision-making process. As with conventional gait analysis in its first steps, multi-segment foot kinematics is becoming increasingly important in clinical practice; in planning management and assessing results.
Open AccessThis article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Stebbins , et al: Gait & Posture. 2006, 23 (4): 401-10. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.03.002.CrossRef Stebbins , et al: Gait & Posture. 2006, 23 (4): 401-10. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.03.002.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Use of the Oxford Foot Model in clinical practice
Auteurs
Jennifer McCahill
Julie Stebbins
Tim Theologis
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2008
Uitgeverij
BioMed Central
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Uitgave bijlage 1/2008
Elektronisch ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-1-S1-O28

Andere artikelen bijlage 1/2008

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2008 Naar de uitgave