Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 8/2023

22-03-2023

Urban/rural differences in preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states: a study of a multi-ethnic region in China

Auteurs: Meixia Liao, Nan Luo, Kim Rand, Zhihao Yang

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to compare health preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states between urban and rural populations in China.

Methods

This study used pooled secondary data from two EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. Participants were recruited from Guizhou province and Chongqing municipality, China using quota sampling. Each participant was interviewed face-to-face to value a set of 15 or 16 out of 30 EQ-5D-5L health states using time trade-off (TTO) methods including composite TTO and other two variants. Regression analysis was used to compare health state preferences between urban and rural participants.

Results

A total of 597 participants (urban: 55.44%; rural: 44.56%) completed the valuation interviews. Both univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses showed that rural participants tended to value health states lower than urban participants regardless of severity of health states. The unadjusted and adjusted overall mean differences between the two groups were − 0.041 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.077, − 0.004, p-value = 0.031) and − 0.040 (95% CI − 0.078, − 0.002, p-value = 0.038), respectively. Predictions for the 3125 health states based on rural participants’ health preferences were lower than those based on urban participants’ health preferences.

Conclusion

There were small, yet statistically significant, differences in EQ-5D-5L health states preferences between urban and rural populations in China. Future study aiming at establishing a national value set should pay more attention to the sample representativeness.
vorige artikel Ethical and practical considerations related to data sharing when collecting patient-reported outcomes in care-based child health research
volgende artikel A composite measure for patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care: design principles and validity checks
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Payakachat, N., Murawski, M. M., & Summers, K. H. (2009). Health utility and economic analysis: Theoretical and practical issues. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 9(4), 289–292.CrossRef
2.
Rowen, D., & Brazier, J. (2011). Health Utility Measurement. In S. Glied & P. C. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Pullenayegum, E. M., Sunderland, K. M., Johnson, J. A., Xie, F., Group, C. E.-D.-L. V. S. (2017). Handling regional variation in health state preferences within a country: A methodological framework. Medical Decision Making, 37(3), 252–261.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Al Shabasy, S., Al Sayah, F., Abbassi, M., & Farid, S. (2022). determinants of health preferences using data from the Egyptian EQ-5D-5L valuation study. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 15(5), 589–598.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Jin, X., Liu, G. G., Luo, N., Li, H., Guan, H., & Xie, F. (2016). Is bad living better than good death? Impact of demographic and cultural factors on health state preference. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 979–986.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., Chen, S., Levin, J. R., & Coons, S. J. (2007). Racial/ethnic differences in preferences for the EQ-5D health states: Results from the US valuation study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(5), 479–490.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Jakubczyk, M., Golicki, D., & Niewada, M. (2016). The impact of a belief in life after death on health-state preferences: True difference or artifact? Quality of Life Research, 25(12), 2997–3008.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sayah, F. A., Bansback, N., Bryan, S., Ohinmaa, A., Poissant, L., Pullenayegum, E., Xie, F., & Johnson, J. A. (2016). Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: Data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study. Quality of Life Research, 25(7), 1679–1685.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Gandhi, M., Tan, R. S., Ng, R., Choo, S. P., Chia, W. K., Toh, C. K., Lam, C., Lee, P. T., Latt, N. K. Z., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2017). Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population. Quality of Life Research, 26(12), 3353–3363.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Karimi, M., Brazier, J., & Paisley, S. (2017). How do individuals value health states? A qualitative investigation. Social Science and Medicine, 172, 80–88.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Goodwin, E., Green, C., & Hawton, A. (2020). What difference does it make? A comparison of health state preferences elicited from the general population and from people with multiple sclerosis. Value in Health, 23(2), 242–250.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Devlin, N. J., & Brooks, R. (2017). EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: Past, present and future. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 15(2), 127–137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Tejada, R. A., Gibbons, L., Belizán, M., Gutierrez, E. L., Reyes, N., & Augustovski, F. A. (2021). Comparison of EQ-5D values sets among South American countries. Value in Health Regional Issues, 26, 56–65.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Rowen, D., Mukuria, C., & McDool, E. (2022). A systematic review of the methodologies and modelling approaches used to generate international EQ-5D-5L value sets. PharmacoEconomics, 40(9), 863–882.CrossRefPubMed
15.
van Nooten, F., Busschbach, J., van Agthoven, M., van Exel, J., & Brouwer, W. (2018). What should we know about the person behind a TTO? (Vol. 19, pp. 1207–1211): Springer.
16.
17.
18.
Jiang, H., Burström, B., Chen, J., & Burström, K. (2021). Rural–urban inequalities in poor self-rated health, self-reported functional disabilities, and depression among Chinese older adults: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study 2011 and 2015. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6557.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Sun, J., & Lyu, S. (2020). Social participation and urban-rural disparity in mental health among older adults in China. Journal of Affective Disorders, 274, 399–404.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zou, Y., Leung, R., Lin, S., Yang, M., Lu, T., Li, X., Gu, J., Hao, C., Dong, G., & Hao, Y. (2016). Attitudes towards suicide in urban and rural China: A population based, cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 1–11.CrossRef
21.
Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Pan, T., Liu, X., & Hu, H. (2019). The comparison of healthcare utilization inequity between URRBMI and NCMS in rural China. International journal for equity in health, 18(1), 1–12.CrossRef
22.
Ying, M., Wang, S., Bai, C., & Li, Y. (2020). Rural-urban differences in health outcomes, healthcare use, and expenditures among older adults under universal health insurance in China. PLoS One, 15(10), e0240194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Ren, Y., Zhou, Z., Cao, D., Ma, B. H., Shen, C., Lai, S., & Chen, G. (2022). Did the Integrated urban and rural resident basic medical insurance improve benefit equity in China? Value in Health, 25(9), 1548–1558.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Liu, G. G., Wu, H., Li, M., Gao, C., & Luo, N. (2014). Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Value in health, 17(5), 597–604.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Luo, N., Liu, G., Li, M., Guan, H., Jin, X., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2017). Estimating an EQ-5D-5L value set for China. Value in Health, 20(4), 662–669.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zhuo, L., Xu, L., Ye, J., Sun, S., Zhang, Y., Burstrom, K., & Chen, J. (2018). Time trade-off value set for EQ-5D-3L based on a nationally representative Chinese population survey. Value in Health, 21(11), 1330–1337.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Liu, G. G., Guan, H., Jin, X., Zhang, H., Vortherms, S. A., & Wu, H. (2022). Rural population’s preferences matter: A value set for the EQ-5D-3L health states for China’s rural population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1), 1–12.CrossRef
28.
29.
Lyu, S., Kang, S., & Koo, J.-H. (2022). Social capital inequality According to Hukou in unequal economic environments in China. Sustainability, 14(21), 13748.CrossRef
30.
Oppe, M., Rand-Hendriksen, K., Shah, K., Ramos-Goñi, J. M., & Luo, N. (2016). EuroQol protocols for time trade-off valuation of health outcomes. PharmacoEconomics, 34(10), 993–1004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Oppe, M., Slaap, B., Busschbach, J. J., & Stolk, E. (2017). Quality control process for EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. Value in health, 20(3), 466–473.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Roudijk, B., Donders, A. R. T., & Stalmeier, P. F. (2019). Cultural values: can they explain differences in health utilities between countries? Medical Decision Making, 39(5), 605–616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
McClure, N. S., Al Sayah, F., Xie, F., Luo, N., & Johnson, J. A. (2017). Instrument-defined estimates of the minimally important difference for EQ-5D-5L index scores. Value in Health, 20(4), 644–650.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Tao, W., Zeng, Z., Dang, H., Lu, B., Chuong, L., Yue, D., Wen, J., Zhao, R., Li, W., & Kominski, G. F. (2020). Towards universal health coverage: Lessons from 10 years of healthcare reform in China. BMJ global health, 5(3), e002086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Su, M., Zhou, Z., Si, Y., Wei, X., Xu, Y., Fan, X., & Chen, G. (2018). Comparing the effects of China’s three basic health insurance schemes on the equity of health-related quality of life: Using the method of coarsened exact matching. Health and quality of life outcomes, 16(1), 1–12.CrossRef
36.
Cheng, M., & Duan, C. (2021). The changing trends of internal migration and urbanization in China: New evidence from the seventh national population census. China Population and Development Studies, 5(3), 275–295.CrossRef
37.
Chen, Z., & Liu, K. (2018). Assimilation of China’s rural-to-urban migrants: A multidimensional process. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 4(2), 188–217.CrossRef
38.
Stolk, E., Ludwig, K., Rand, K., van Hout, B., & Ramos-Goñi, J. M. (2019). Overview, update, and lessons learned from the international EQ-5D-5L valuation work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value in Health, 22(1), 23–30.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Oppe, M., Stolk, E., Shah, K., Kreimeier, S., Rivero-Arias, O., & Devlin, N. (2020). International valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. PharmacoEconomics, 38(7), 653–663.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Urban/rural differences in preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states: a study of a multi-ethnic region in China
Auteurs
Meixia Liao
Nan Luo
Kim Rand
Zhihao Yang
Publicatiedatum
22-03-2023
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03394-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2023

Quality of Life Research 8/2023 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

A qualitative study of lived experiences and needs of advanced cancer patients in Malaysia: Gaps and steps forward

OriginalPaper

Sensitivity to change of generic preference-based instruments (EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and HUI3) in the context of treatment for people with prescription-type opioid use disorder in Canada

OriginalPaper

Psychosocial health and quality of life in ICSI and naturally conceived adolescents: a cross-sectional comparison

OriginalPaper

Construct validity and responsiveness of a health-related symptom index for persons either treated or monitored for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL): AMC-A01/-A03

OriginalPaper

Hungarian PROMIS-29+2: psychometric properties and population reference values

OriginalPaper

Measuring Frailty Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Data: A Feasibility Study in Patients with Multiple Myeloma