Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The health professions have progressed and evolved considerably over the last few decades in response to demographic, technological, societal and political changes. They continue to do so as the volume and complexity of population health needs steadily increase. Role boundary expansion is among the key changes to the health professions, including podiatry to meet demand. Nonetheless podiatry’s role boundary expansion has not been achieved swiftly or without resistance from neighbouring and dominant professions. This paper seeks to explain the nature of this resistance with respect to the sociology of the professions literature and to shed light on some of the factors and processes at play when role boundary changes arise in health care.
Six of the most contemporaneously relevant sociology of the professions theories are summarised: Taxonomic, Marxian, Bourdieusian, Foucauldian, Boundary Work and Neo-Weberian paradigms.
This review highlights that some paradigms are more relevant than others in the current socio-political landscape. It also illustrates that there is a common theme underlying each approach to defining the professions and their boundaries: competition. This may help health professionals, including podiatrists, to understand and manage the challenges and resistance experienced when professions attempt to expand role boundaries to meet increasing and changing population health needs.
Borthwick AM, et al. Achieving professional status: Australian podiatrists' perceptions. J Foot Ankle Research. 2009;2(1):1. CrossRef
Nancarrow SA. Six principles to enhance health workforce flexibility. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(1):1. CrossRef
Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS. Work, Employ Soc. 2009;23(2):267–84. CrossRef
Bach S, Kessler I, Heron P. Role redesign in a modernised NHS: the case of health care assistants. Hum Resour Manag J. 2008;18(2):171–87. CrossRef
Productivity Commission Australia's Health Workforce Research Report 2005.
Martin, G.P., Interprofessional boundaries . The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society, 2014.
King O, et al. Diabetes educator role boundaries: a documentary analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017;20
MacNaughton K, Chreim S, Bourgeault IL. Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 486–486
King O, et al. Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8(1):1. CrossRef
Brante T. Professional fields and truth regimes: in search of alternative approaches. Comp Sociol. 2010;9(6):843–86. CrossRef
Freidson, E., Professional powers: A study of the institutionalisation of formal knowledge. 1986, Chicago and London: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Larson, M.S., In the matter of experts and professionals, or how impossible it is to leave nothing unsaid. The formation of professions: knowledge, state and strategy, 1990: p. 24–50.
Allsop, J. and M. Saks, Regulating the health professions. 2003: Sage.
Fournier V. Boundary work and the (un) making of the professions. In: I Malin, Nigel (red) Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace. Florence, KY: Routhledge; 2000.
Macdonald, K.M., The Sociology of the Professions: SAGE Publications. 1995: Sage.
Saks M. Defining a profession: the role of knowledge and expertise. Prof Professionalism. 2012;2(1)
Carr -Saunders, S.A.M. and P.A. Wilson, The Professions. 1933.
Larkin, G., Occupational monopoly and modern medicine. 1983: Taylor & Francis.
Parsons, T., The structure of social action; a study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. 1968: Talcott Parsons.
Saks M. Removing the blinkers? A critique of recent contributions to the sociology of professions. Sociol Rev. 1983;31(1):3–21. CrossRef
Saks M. Regulating the English healthcare professions: zoos, circuses or safari parks? J Prof Organ. 2013;
Larson MS. The rise of professionalism. Berkeley. University of California Press. Maister, DM (1986):“the thee Es of the professional life”. J Manag Consult. 1977;3:2–39.
Poulantzas, N.A. and D. Fernbach, Classes in contemporary capitalism. 1975: NLb London.
Johnson, T., The professions in the class structure. 1977.
Braverman H. Labour and monopoly capital: the deregulation of work in the twentieth century. New York & London: Monthly Review Press; 1974.
Bourdieu P. Social space and symbolic power. Sociol Theor. 1989;7(1):14–25. CrossRef
Borthwick A. Occupational imperialism at work: the case of podiatric surgery. Br J Podiatry. 2001;4(3):70–9.
Mackey H. ‘Do not ask me to remain the same’: Foucault and the professional identities of occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2007;54(2):95–102. CrossRef
Foucault, M., Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. 1977: Vintage.
Nettleton, S., Power, pain , and dentistry 1992: Open University.
Armstrong D. Bodies of knowledge: Foucault and the problem of human anatomy. Sociological theory and medical sociology. London: Tavistock; 1987. p. 59–76.
Nettleton S. Protecting a vulnerable margin: towards an analysis of how the mouth came to be separated from the body. Sociol Health Illn. 1988;10(2):156–69. CrossRef
Borthwick A. Perspectives on podiatric biomechanics: Foucault and the professional project. Br J Podiatry. 1999;2(1):21–8.
Vernon W, et al. Issues of podiatry status in the UK. Br J Podiatry. 2005;8(1):6.
Weber M. Econ Soc: An interpretative Sociology. Bedminster: NewYork; 1968.
Jamous H, Peloille B. Changes in the French university-hospital system. Pro Professionalization. 1970:111–52.
Witz A. Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge; 1992. CrossRef
Larson, M.S. and M.S. Larson, The rise of professionalism: a Sociol Anal Vol. 233. 1979b: Univ of California Press.
Harrits GS. Professional closure beyond state authorization. Prof Professionalism. 2014;4(1)
Saks M. Analyzing the professions: the case for the neo-Weberian approach. Comp Sociol. 2010;9(6):887–915. CrossRef
Roth, G. and C. Wittich, eds. Econ Soc : An Outline of Interpretative Sociology :(Vol 1)-2. ed. M. Weber. 1968, Bedminster Press: New York.
Freidson, E., Professional dominance: the social structure of Med Care 1970a: Transaction Publishers.
Freidson, E., The profession of medicine . New York: Dodd, Mead, 1970b. 81.
Freidson, E., The futures of professionalisation . Health and the Division of Labour, 1977: p. 14–38.
Parkin F. Marxism and class theory: a bourgeois critique. London: Tavistock; 1979.
Abbott, A., The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Labor. 1988: University of Chicago Press.
Bach S, Kessler I, Heron P. Nursing a grievance? The role of healthcare assistants in a modernized National Health Service. Gend, Work Organ. 2012;19(2):205–24. CrossRef
Murphy R. The structure of closure: a critique and development of the theories of weber, Collins, and Parkin. Br J Sociol. 1984;35(4):547–67. CrossRef
Willis E. Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociol Rev. 2006;15(5):421–31. CrossRef
The Podiatry Board of Australia Prescribing information for podiatrists endorsed for scheduled medicines. 2011.
- Sociology of the professions: what it means for podiatry
- BioMed Central