Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2013

01-04-2013 | Brief Communication

Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 Health Survey

Auteurs: Diane M. Turner-Bowker, Renee N. Saris-Baglama, Michael A. DeRosa

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structure of a computerized electronic version of the SF-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) with items administered one-per-page versus the traditional grid format used in the paper-and-pencil version in a sample of physician-diagnosed headache patients.

Methods

Patients (N = 180) completed the SF-36v2 administered as part of a broader study of health outcomes. Scaling assumptions, reliability, factor structure, and the tool’s ability to discriminate between headache pain severity groups were examined.

Results

Frequency distributions showed notable ceiling effects for the role emotional, social functioning, physical functioning, and role physical scales, but negligible (<1.2%) floor effects for any of the scales. Internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from 0.81 to 0.95 for the eight health domains. Items passed tests of internal consistency and discriminant validity. Principal components’ analyses confirmed the 2-factor structure; the pattern of correlations across scales was consistent with expectations for the physical and mental health components. As expected, patients with severe headache pain had lower mean SF-36v2 scores than those with mild or moderate pain. No significant score differences were observed between mild and moderate pain severity groups.

Conclusions

Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 is reliable and valid for use with headache patients.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef Ware, J. E., Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr, Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 ® health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute. Ware, J. E., Jr, Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 ® health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute.
3.
go back to reference Becker, W. J. (2002). Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with migraine. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 29(Suppl 2), S16–S22.PubMed Becker, W. J. (2002). Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with migraine. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 29(Suppl 2), S16–S22.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr, Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Turner-Bowker, D. M., Gandek, B., & Maruish, M. E. (2007). User’s manual for the SF-36v2™ health survey (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated. Ware, J. E., Jr, Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Turner-Bowker, D. M., Gandek, B., & Maruish, M. E. (2007). User’s manual for the SF-36v2™ health survey (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
5.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr, Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Turner-Bowker, D. M., Gandek, B., & Maruish, M. E. (2008). SF-36v2 ® health survey: Administration guide for clinical trial investigators. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated. Ware, J. E., Jr, Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Turner-Bowker, D. M., Gandek, B., & Maruish, M. E. (2008). SF-36v2 ® health survey: Administration guide for clinical trial investigators. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
6.
go back to reference Turner-Bowker, D. M., DeRosa, M. A., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2007). SF-36® health survey. In S. Boslaugh (Ed.), Encyclopedia of epidemiology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Turner-Bowker, D. M., DeRosa, M. A., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2007). SF-36® health survey. In S. Boslaugh (Ed.), Encyclopedia of epidemiology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
go back to reference Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2007). Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5 Suppl), S90–S96.PubMedCrossRef Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2007). Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5 Suppl), S90–S96.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value in Health, 11(2), 322–333.PubMedCrossRef Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value in Health, 11(2), 322–333.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., Lundy, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value in Health, 12(4), 419–429.PubMedCrossRef Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., Lundy, J. J., Sloan, J. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value in Health, 12(4), 419–429.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Single-item electronic administration of the SF-36v2 Health Survey
Auteurs
Diane M. Turner-Bowker
Renee N. Saris-Baglama
Michael A. DeRosa
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0169-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2013

Quality of Life Research 3/2013 Naar de uitgave