Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

15-11-2023

Physical and occupational therapists' perceptions of sustainability of a knowledge translation intervention to improve the use of outcome measures in inpatient rehabilitation: a qualitative study

Auteurs: Wendy M. Romney, Michelle E. Wormley, Diana Veneri, Andrea Oberlander, Victoria Catizone, Pete Grevelding

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2024

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of sustaining the use of outcome measures of physical and occupational therapists following a three-year knowledge translation intervention.

Methods

A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted at an inpatient rehabilitation hospital on 13 clinicians (6 physical therapists and 7 occupational therapists) participating in the knowledge translation intervention. Data collection used semi-structured interviewing during three focus groups to understand the lived experience of clinicians participating in the knowledge translation project. Data were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) codebook.

Results

Two investigators coded twelve CFIR constructs into barriers and facilitators for outcome measure use. Four key themes emerged as determinants for outcome measures use: (1) Organizational support and clinician engagement; (2) the knowledge translation intervention; (3) the outcome measures themselves; and (4) the patients. Clinicians reported using outcome measures for patient education, treatment planning, and goal setting, while they found other outcome measures lacked functional significance. Facilitators included organizational support, access to knowledge, ongoing training, and clinician engagement. Ongoing barriers included the need for more training and the need to select different tests.

Conclusions

This study found proper selection of outcomes measures is important and attributed the sustainability of the knowledge translation intervention to organizational support, clinician engagement and ongoing training. The clinicians wanted continued training to overcome new barriers. Barriers identified in this study were unique to the typical barriers identified for outcome measure use. Ongoing barrier assessments are needed for continued refinement of knowledge translation interventions to enhance sustainability.

vorige artikel A random item effects generalized partial credit model with a multiple imputation-based scoring procedure

volgende artikel Differences in health-related quality of life between native and foreign-born gynaecological cancer patients in Sweden: a five-year cross-sectional study

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47CrossRefPubMed

Hudon, A., Gervais, M.-J., & Hunt, M. (2015). The contribution of conceptual frameworks to knowledge translation interventions in physical therapy. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130483CrossRefPubMed

Nilsen, P., & Bernhardsson, S. (2019). Context matters in implementation science: A scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moore, J. L., Mbalilaki, J. A., & Graham, I. D. (2022). Knowledge translation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a citation analysis of the knowledge-to-action literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 103(7), S256–S275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.031CrossRefPubMed

Romney, W., Bellows, D. M., Tavernite, J. P., Salbach, N., & Deutsch, J. E. (2022). Knowledge translation research to promote behavior changes in rehabilitation: use of theoretical frameworks and tailored interventions: a scoping review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 103(7), S276–S296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.076CrossRefPubMed

Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., & Graham, I. D. (2013). Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving Evidence into Practice (2nd ed.). NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRef

Jette, D. U., Halbert, J., Iverson, C., Miceli, E., & Shah, P. (2009). Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy, 89(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080234CrossRefPubMed

American Physical Therapy Association. (2014). Guide to Physical Therapy Practice: Measurement and Outcomes. Retrieved January 7, 2020, from http://guidetoptpractice.apta.org/content/1/SEC3.body

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2018). Guidelines for Documentation of Occupational Therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(Supplement_2), 7212410010p1–7212410010p7. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.72S203

10.

Duncan, E. A., & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Briggs, M. S., Rethman, K. K., Crookes, J., Cheek, F., Pottkotter, K., McGrath, S., DeWitt, J., Harmon-Matthews, L. E., & Quatman-Yates, C. C. (2020). Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in outpatient rehabilitation settings: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 101(10), 1796–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.007CrossRefPubMed

12.

Colquhoun, H. L., Lamontagne, M.-E., Duncan, E. A., Fiander, M., Champagne, C., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2017). A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516644309CrossRefPubMed

13.

McDonnell, B., Stillwell, S., Hart, S., & Davis, R. B. (2018). Breaking down barriers to the utilization of standardized tests and outcome measures in acute care physical therapist practice: an observational longitudinal study. Physical Therapy, 98(6), 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Romney, W., Wormley, M., Veneri, D., Oberlander, A., Grevelding, P., Rice, J., & Moore, J. (2022). Knowledge translation intervention increased the use of outcome measures by physical therapists in inpatient rehabilitation. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 83(12), 2019–2028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.1898065CrossRef

15.

Romney, W., Salbach, N., Parrott, J. S., & Deutsch, J. E. (2020). A knowledge translation intervention designed and implemented by a knowledge broker improved documented use of gait speed: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 43(3), E1–E10. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000239CrossRefPubMed

16.

Russell, D. J., Rivard, L. M., Walter, S. D., Rosenbaum, P. L., Roxborough, L., Cameron, D., Darrah, J., Bartlett, D. J., Hanna, S. E., & Avery, L. M. (2010). Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: A before-after intervention study. Implementation Science: IS, 5, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Schreiber, J., Marchetti, G. F., Racicot, B., & Kaminski, E. (2015). The use of a knowledge translation program to increase use of standardized outcome measures in an outpatient pediatric physical therapy clinic: Administrative case report. Physical Therapy, 95(4), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130434CrossRefPubMed

18.

Sibley, K. M., Bentley, D. C., Salbach, N. M., Gardner, P., McGlynn, M., O’Hoski, S., Shaffer, J., Shing, P., McEwen, S., Beauchamp, M. K., Hossain, S., Straus, S. E., & Jaglal, S. B. (2018). A theory-based multi-component intervention to increase reactive balance measurement by physiotherapists in three rehabilitation hospitals: An uncontrolled single group study. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 724. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3533-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Swinkels, R. A. H. M., Meerhoff, G. M., Custers, J. W. H., van Peppen, R. P. S., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., & Wittink, H. (2015). Using outcome measures in daily practice: development and evaluation of an implementation strategy for physiotherapists in the Netherlands. Physiotherapy Canada, 67(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2014-28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Van Peppen, R. P. S., Maissan, F. J. F., Van Genderen, F. R., Van Dolder, R., & Van Meeteren, N. L. U. (2008). Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: A survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiotherapy Research International, 13(4), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.417CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gaid, D., Ahmed, S., Alhasani, R., Thomas, A., & Bussières, A. (2020). Determinants that influence knowledge brokers’ and opinion leaders’ role to close knowledge practice gaps in rehabilitation: A realist review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13482CrossRefPubMed

22.

Proctor, E., Luke, D., Calhoun, A., McMillen, C., Brownson, R., McCrary, S., & Padek, M. (2015). Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: Research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support. Implementation Science, 10(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0274-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687CrossRefPubMed

25.

Codebook Template. (2019). CFIR Technical Assistance Website. http://www.cfirguide.org/tools.html

26.

Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8CrossRef

29.

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870CrossRefPubMed

30.

Worum, H., Lillekroken, D., Ahlsen, B., Roaldsen, K. S., & Bergland, A. (2020). Otago exercise programme—from evidence to practice: A qualitative study of physiotherapists’ perceptions of the importance of organisational factors of leadership, context and culture for knowledge translation in Norway. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 985. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05853-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Li, S.-A., Jeffs, L., Barwick, M., & Stevens, B. (2018). Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: A systematic integrative review. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Gifford, W. A., Squires, J. E., Angus, D. E., Ashley, L. A., Brosseau, L., Craik, J. M., Domecq, M.-C., Egan, M., Holyoke, P., Juergensen, L., Wallin, L., Wazni, L., & Graham, I. D. (2018). Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0817-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013). Implementation strategies: Recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science, 8(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Romney, W., Salbach, N. M., Parrott, J. S., Ward, I. G., & Deutsch, J. E. (2022). A knowledge broker facilitated intervention to improve the use of standardized assessment tools by physical therapists: A cluster randomized trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 36(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155211046460CrossRefPubMed

35.

Colquhoun, H. L., Squires, J. E., Kolehmainen, N., Fraser, C., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2017). Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 12(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Leeman, J., Calancie, L., Hartman, M. A., Escoffery, C. T., Herrmann, A. K., Tague, L. E., Moore, A. A., Wilson, K. M., Schreiner, M., & Samuel-Hodge, C. (2015). What strategies are used to build practitioners’ capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 10(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0272-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Bazyk, S., Demirjian, L., LaGuardia, T., Thompson-Repas, K., Conway, C., & Michaud, P. (2015). Building capacity of occupational therapy practitioners to address the mental health needs of children and youth: a mixed-methods study of knowledge translation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.019182CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bennett, S., Whitehead, M., Eames, S., Fleming, J., Low, S., & Caldwell, E. (2016). Building capacity for knowledge translation in occupational therapy: Learning through participatory action research. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0771-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8CrossRef

Titel: Physical and occupational therapists' perceptions of sustainability of a knowledge translation intervention to improve the use of outcome measures in inpatient rehabilitation: a qualitative study
Auteurs: Wendy M. Romney
Michelle E. Wormley
Diana Veneri
Andrea Oberlander
Victoria Catizone
Pete Grevelding
Publicatiedatum: 15-11-2023
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03550-7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2024

The impact of endoscopic treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett’s neoplasia: a scoping review

The effects of community-based home health care on the physical and mental health of older adults with chronic diseases

Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system

Sexual quality of life after gynaecological cancer: what young women want

Australian population norms for health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D–5L, and relationships with sociodemographic characteristics

QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment