Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Poster presentation

‘Paging Podiatry!’: an audit of acute inpatient podiatry referrals

Auteurs: Sarah Dallimore, Katrina Richards

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | bijlage 1/2011

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
insite
ZOEKEN

Background

In 2010, the Box Hill Hospital podiatry department increased staffing levels from 0.6 to 1.6 EFT. Historically a limited High Risk Foot outpatient service, this increase meant there was more time available to build the much needed inpatient service. Promotion of the new service has resulted in a substantial increase in podiatry referrals from the acute wards. The Podiatry Department has also established close links with the Vascular Surgery Department and is a part of their Outpatient Clinic. Once received, the podiatry referrals are routinely triaged into prioritisation categories, according to the severity of the described complaint and any reported co-morbidities. Category 1 and 2 referrals essentially revolve around active foot wounds and complications that require an immediate podiatry response. Category 3 and 4 referrals are less medically urgent and not seen as a priority to the service.

Method

All inpatient referrals received from January until October 2010 were recorded on an excel spreadsheet. Included for analysis was referring unit and ward, and the triaged prioritisation category.

Results

A total of 263 referrals were received in this period. The greatest number of referrals came from the Medical and Vascular Units: General Medical B 16.7%; General Medical A 14.8%; Rapid Assessment Medical Unit (RAMU) 14.4%; and Vascular 14.1%.Of these four top referring units, the Vascular Unit had the greatest number of appropriate referrals with 91.9% being either a Category 1 or 2. General Medical A had 44.74%, General Medical B 52.27% and RAMU 47.37%.

Conclusion

The Vascular Unit had the most number of Category 1 and 2 referrals. This is most likely due to the increased number of patients with high-risk feet under this unit and their understanding of podiatry’s role with the High Risk Foot. The Medical Units referred the most to podiatry, however approximately half of the referrals received were classified as non-urgent and not required to be seen by the podiatrist if time did not permit.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
Metagegevens
Titel
‘Paging Podiatry!’: an audit of acute inpatient podiatry referrals
Auteurs
Sarah Dallimore
Katrina Richards
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2011
Uitgeverij
BioMed Central
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Uitgave bijlage 1/2011
Elektronisch ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-S1-P13