Skip to main content
Top

2005 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

4. Orthodontic Bonding to Wet Enamel with Water-Insensitive and Water-Activated Orthodontic Adhesive Resins

Auteurs : T. Eliades, G. Eliades, N. Silikas, D.C. Watts

Gepubliceerd in: Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding

Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The interference of moisture in enamel bonding procedures is of interest mainly for orthodontic applications and to a lesser extent for bonded restorations. The mechanism and interfacial phenomena of enamel bonding from a restorative dentistry perspective are analyzed in Chap. 1.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkman PG, Süssenberger U, Miethke RR. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113:402–407 Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkman PG, Süssenberger U, Miethke RR. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113:402–407
2.
go back to reference Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: Wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1998; 1:29–36PubMed Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: Wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1998; 1:29–36PubMed
3.
go back to reference Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25:51–58PubMed Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25:51–58PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Angelis M de, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:633–640CrossRefPubMed Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Angelis M de, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:633–640CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bishara SE, Wald L von, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:466–469PubMed Bishara SE, Wald L von, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:466–469PubMed
6.
go back to reference Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Eliades G. Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24:35–42CrossRefPubMed Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Eliades G. Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24:35–42CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:13–23CrossRefPubMed Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:13–23CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21:33–43CrossRefPubMed Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21:33–43CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Katona TR, Chen J. Engineering and experimental analyses of the tensile loads applied during strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106:167–174CrossRef Katona TR, Chen J. Engineering and experimental analyses of the tensile loads applied during strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106:167–174CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Katona TR, Moore BK. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets: a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105:543–551CrossRef Katona TR, Moore BK. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets: a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105:543–551CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Buschang PH, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton GS. Quantification of human chewing-cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol 2000 45:461–474CrossRefPubMed Buschang PH, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton GS. Quantification of human chewing-cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol 2000 45:461–474CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Anderson K, Throckmorton GS, Buschang PH, Havasaki H. The effects of bolus hardness on masticatory kinematics. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:689–696CrossRefPubMed Anderson K, Throckmorton GS, Buschang PH, Havasaki H. The effects of bolus hardness on masticatory kinematics. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:689–696CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Braem M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G, van Doren V, Lambrechts P. The relationship between test methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987; 5:1036–1039CrossRef Braem M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G, van Doren V, Lambrechts P. The relationship between test methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987; 5:1036–1039CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of loading rate on bond strength of brackets bonded to enamel. J Orofac Orthop 2004; 65:336–342CrossRefPubMed Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of loading rate on bond strength of brackets bonded to enamel. J Orofac Orthop 2004; 65:336–342CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. Investigation of a hydrophylic primer for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Orthod 2000; 27:181–186CrossRefPubMed Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. Investigation of a hydrophylic primer for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Orthod 2000; 27:181–186CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:294–301CrossRefPubMed Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:294–301CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Monomer leaching from chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:316–321CrossRefPubMed Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Monomer leaching from chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:316–321CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Reynolds. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2:171–178 Reynolds. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2:171–178
20.
go back to reference Moseley HC, Horrocks EN, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Effects of cyclic stressing on attachment bond strength using glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Br J Orthod 1995; 22:23–27CrossRefPubMed Moseley HC, Horrocks EN, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Effects of cyclic stressing on attachment bond strength using glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Br J Orthod 1995; 22:23–27CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:132–141CrossRefPubMed Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:132–141CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. The effect of food simulants on enamel-composite bond strength. J Orthod. 2000; 27:55–59CrossRefPubMed Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. The effect of food simulants on enamel-composite bond strength. J Orthod. 2000; 27:55–59CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Murray SD, Hobson RS. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:2–9CrossRefPubMed Murray SD, Hobson RS. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:2–9CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bishara SE, Wald L von, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:466–469PubMed Bishara SE, Wald L von, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:466–469PubMed
25.
go back to reference Haydar B, Sarikaya S, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1999; 69:457–462PubMed Haydar B, Sarikaya S, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1999; 69:457–462PubMed
26.
go back to reference Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:277–281CrossRefPubMed Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:277–281CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Eliades T, Eliades G. Orthodontic adhesive resins. In: Brantley W A, Eliades T, eds. Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, pp 201–21 Eliades T, Eliades G. Orthodontic adhesive resins. In: Brantley W A, Eliades T, eds. Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, pp 201–21
28.
go back to reference Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentin bonding systems. J Dent 1994; 22:73–81CrossRefPubMed Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentin bonding systems. J Dent 1994; 22:73–81CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Peters WJ, Jackson RW, Smith DC. Studies of the stability and toxicity of zinc polyacrylate (polycarboxylate)cements (PAZ). J Biomed Mater Res 1974; 8:53–60CrossRefPubMed Peters WJ, Jackson RW, Smith DC. Studies of the stability and toxicity of zinc polyacrylate (polycarboxylate)cements (PAZ). J Biomed Mater Res 1974; 8:53–60CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Turner GPA. Introduction to paint chemistry and principles of paint technology, Chapman and Hall, London, 1980CrossRef Turner GPA. Introduction to paint chemistry and principles of paint technology, Chapman and Hall, London, 1980CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Korbmacher H, Klocke A, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Evaluation of a new one-phase orthodontic adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:595 (Abstract) Korbmacher H, Klocke A, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Evaluation of a new one-phase orthodontic adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:595 (Abstract)
32.
go back to reference Brantley WA, Eliades T, Litsky AS. Mechanics and mechanical testing of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, pp 27–49 Brantley WA, Eliades T, Litsky AS. Mechanics and mechanical testing of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, pp 27–49
33.
go back to reference Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:54–58CrossRefPubMed Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:54–58CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Schaneveldt S, Foley TF. Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 12:267–273CrossRef Schaneveldt S, Foley TF. Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 12:267–273CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:251–255CrossRefPubMed Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:251–255CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. In vivo evaluation of two moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial: J Orthod 2003; 30:139–147CrossRefPubMed Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. In vivo evaluation of two moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial: J Orthod 2003; 30:139–147CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Karamouzos A, Mavropoulos A, Athanasiou AE, Kolokithas G. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive: a comparative clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5:170–178CrossRefPubMed Karamouzos A, Mavropoulos A, Athanasiou AE, Kolokithas G. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive: a comparative clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5:170–178CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Cook WD. Polymerization defects in composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Peter Szulc, The Netherlands, 1984 Cook WD. Polymerization defects in composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Peter Szulc, The Netherlands, 1984
39.
40.
go back to reference Söderholm K-J, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1248CrossRefPubMed Söderholm K-J, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1248CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Söderholm K-J. Leaking of fillers in dental composites. J Dent Res 1993; 62:126CrossRef Söderholm K-J. Leaking of fillers in dental composites. J Dent Res 1993; 62:126CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Söderholm, K-J. Filler systems and resin interface. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Peter Szulc, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1984, p 139 Söderholm, K-J. Filler systems and resin interface. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Peter Szulc, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1984, p 139
43.
go back to reference Söderholm K-J. Filler leachability during water storage of six composite materials. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:82PubMed Söderholm K-J. Filler leachability during water storage of six composite materials. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:82PubMed
44.
go back to reference Söderholm K-J, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1692CrossRefPubMed Söderholm K-J, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1692CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Söderholm K-J. In vivo degradation mechanisms of dental resin composites. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC, eds. Dental materials in vivo: aging and related phenomena. Quintessence, Chicago, 2003, pp 99–125 Söderholm K-J. In vivo degradation mechanisms of dental resin composites. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC, eds. Dental materials in vivo: aging and related phenomena. Quintessence, Chicago, 2003, pp 99–125
46.
go back to reference Eliades T, Eliades G, Bradley TG, Watts DC. Degree of cure of orthodontic adhesives with various polymerization initiation modes. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:395–399CrossRefPubMed Eliades T, Eliades G, Bradley TG, Watts DC. Degree of cure of orthodontic adhesives with various polymerization initiation modes. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:395–399CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Papagiannoulis L, Tzoutzas J, Eliades G. Effect of topical fluoride agents on the morphologic characteristics and composition of resin composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:405CrossRefPubMed Papagiannoulis L, Tzoutzas J, Eliades G. Effect of topical fluoride agents on the morphologic characteristics and composition of resin composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:405CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Kula K, McKinney JE, Kula TJ. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin degradation and wear. Dent Mater 1997; 13:305CrossRefPubMed Kula K, McKinney JE, Kula TJ. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin degradation and wear. Dent Mater 1997; 13:305CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Billmeyer FW Jr (ed) Thermosetting resins. In: Textbook of polymer science. Wiley, New York, 1984, pp 436–457 Billmeyer FW Jr (ed) Thermosetting resins. In: Textbook of polymer science. Wiley, New York, 1984, pp 436–457
50.
go back to reference Munksgaard EC, Freud M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (di)methacrylates and their polymers. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:261PubMed Munksgaard EC, Freud M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (di)methacrylates and their polymers. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:261PubMed
51.
go back to reference Freud M, Munksgaard EC. Enzymatic degradation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA polymers causing decreased microhardness and greater wear in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:351–355 Freud M, Munksgaard EC. Enzymatic degradation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA polymers causing decreased microhardness and greater wear in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:351–355
52.
go back to reference de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 1996; 17:1327CrossRefPubMed de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 1996; 17:1327CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Oonsombat C, Bishara SE, Ajlouni R. The effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with the use of a new self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:547–550CrossRefPubMed Oonsombat C, Bishara SE, Ajlouni R. The effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with the use of a new self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:547–550CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Reddy L, Marker VA, Ellis E III. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:206–213CrossRefPubMed Reddy L, Marker VA, Ellis E III. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:206–213CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Orthodontic Bonding to Wet Enamel with Water-Insensitive and Water-Activated Orthodontic Adhesive Resins
Auteurs
T. Eliades
G. Eliades
N. Silikas
D.C. Watts
Copyright
2005
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_4