Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 10/2019

08-06-2019

Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients

Auteurs: Anika Stephan, Jens Mainzer, Danica Kümmel, Franco M. Impellizzeri

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 10/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the measurement properties of the German PROMIS short forms for pain intensity (PAIN), pain interference (PI) and physical function (PF) in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients.

Methods

Patient-rated outcomes were collected from consecutive patients of our foot and ankle registry before and 6 months after surgery. Measurement properties were tested according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). The German Foot Function Index (FFI-D) served as a legacy measure.

Results

748 patients were included in our cross-sectional sample. Longitudinal and test–retest data were available for 202 and 65 patients, respectively. Construct validity of all short forms was good. All Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.7. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was highest for PF (8.9) and lowest for PI (6.5). Minimal important change was 4 to 5 points and thus smaller than SDC for all instruments. We observed a baseline ceiling effect for PF. PI showed insufficiently correlated change scores with FFI-D disability change scores, and therefore failed the responsiveness testing.

Conclusion

Our study showed some adequate psychometric properties, but also certain aspects regarding interpretability and responsiveness that researchers must be aware of when using PROMIS short forms of pain and function in foot and ankle surgery patients.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hung, M., Baumhauer, J. F., Brodsky, J. W., Cheng, C., Ellis, S. J., Franklin, J. D., et al. (2014). Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot and Ankle International, 35(6), 592–599.PubMedCrossRef Hung, M., Baumhauer, J. F., Brodsky, J. W., Cheng, C., Ellis, S. J., Franklin, J. D., et al. (2014). Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot and Ankle International, 35(6), 592–599.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hung, M., Baumhauer, J. F., Latt, L. D., Saltzman, C. L., SooHoo, N. F., Hunt, K. J., et al. (2013). Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(11), 3466–3474.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hung, M., Baumhauer, J. F., Latt, L. D., Saltzman, C. L., SooHoo, N. F., Hunt, K. J., et al. (2013). Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(11), 3466–3474.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Slullitel, G. A. (2017). CORR Insights((R)): PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function scores correlate with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in patients with Hallux Valgus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 475(11), 2781–2782.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Slullitel, G. A. (2017). CORR Insights((R)): PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function scores correlate with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in patients with Hallux Valgus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 475(11), 2781–2782.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, C. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, C. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, C. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., et al. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179.PubMedCrossRef Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, C. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., et al. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensen, M. P., Chen, W. H., Choi, S., Revicki, D., et al. (2010). Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 150(1), 173–182.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensen, M. P., Chen, W. H., Choi, S., Revicki, D., et al. (2010). Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 150(1), 173–182.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Gandek, B., Bruce, B., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2014). The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 516–526.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Gandek, B., Bruce, B., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2014). The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 516–526.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sierevelt, I. N., Zwiers, R., Schats, W., Haverkamp, D., Terwee, C. B., Nolte, P. A., et al. (2018). Measurement properties of the most commonly used foot- and ankle-specific questionnaires: The FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 26(7), 2059–2073.PubMedCrossRef Sierevelt, I. N., Zwiers, R., Schats, W., Haverkamp, D., Terwee, C. B., Nolte, P. A., et al. (2018). Measurement properties of the most commonly used foot- and ankle-specific questionnaires: The FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 26(7), 2059–2073.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Naal, F. D., Impellizzeri, F. M., Huber, M., & Rippstein, P. F. (2008). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints. Foot and Ankle International, 29(12), 1222–1228.PubMedCrossRef Naal, F. D., Impellizzeri, F. M., Huber, M., & Rippstein, P. F. (2008). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints. Foot and Ankle International, 29(12), 1222–1228.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schneider, W., & Jurenitsch, S. (2016). Age- and sex-related normative data for the Foot Function Index in a German-speaking cohort. Foot and Ankle International, 37(11), 1238–1242.PubMedCrossRef Schneider, W., & Jurenitsch, S. (2016). Age- and sex-related normative data for the Foot Function Index in a German-speaking cohort. Foot and Ankle International, 37(11), 1238–1242.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Impellizzeri, F. M., Mannion, A. F., Naal, F. D., Hersche, O., & Leunig, M. (2012). The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: Success depends on how you measure it. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 20(7), 638–645.PubMedCrossRef Impellizzeri, F. M., Mannion, A. F., Naal, F. D., Hersche, O., & Leunig, M. (2012). The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: Success depends on how you measure it. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 20(7), 638–645.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mannion, A. F., Elfering, A., Staerkle, R., Junge, A., Grob, D., Semmer, N. K., et al. (2005). Outcome assessment in low back pain: How low can you go? European Spine Journal, 14(10), 1014–1026.PubMedCrossRef Mannion, A. F., Elfering, A., Staerkle, R., Junge, A., Grob, D., Semmer, N. K., et al. (2005). Outcome assessment in low back pain: How low can you go? European Spine Journal, 14(10), 1014–1026.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
19.
go back to reference Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ho, B., Houck, J. R., Flemister, A. S., Ketz, J., Oh, I., DiGiovanni, B. F., et al. (2016). Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot and Ankle International, 37(9), 911–918.PubMedCrossRef Ho, B., Houck, J. R., Flemister, A. S., Ketz, J., Oh, I., DiGiovanni, B. F., et al. (2016). Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot and Ankle International, 37(9), 911–918.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Anderson, M. R., Houck, J. R., Saltzman, C. L., Hung, M., Nickisch, F., Barg, A., et al. (2018). Validation and generalizability of preoperative PROMIS scores to predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot and Ankle International, 39(7), 763–770.PubMedCrossRef Anderson, M. R., Houck, J. R., Saltzman, C. L., Hung, M., Nickisch, F., Barg, A., et al. (2018). Validation and generalizability of preoperative PROMIS scores to predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot and Ankle International, 39(7), 763–770.PubMedCrossRef
23.
30.
go back to reference Guyatt, G. H., Norman, G. R., Juniper, E. F., & Griffith, L. E. (2002). A critical look at transition ratings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(9), 900–908.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt, G. H., Norman, G. R., Juniper, E. F., & Griffith, L. E. (2002). A critical look at transition ratings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(9), 900–908.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109.PubMedCrossRef Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Jensen, R. E., Potosky, A. L., Reeve, B. B., Hahn, E., Cella, D., Fries, J., et al. (2015). Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2333–2344.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jensen, R. E., Potosky, A. L., Reeve, B. B., Hahn, E., Cella, D., Fries, J., et al. (2015). Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 24(10), 2333–2344.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27–48.PubMedCrossRef Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27–48.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients
Auteurs
Anika Stephan
Jens Mainzer
Danica Kümmel
Franco M. Impellizzeri
Publicatiedatum
08-06-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02221-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2019

Quality of Life Research 10/2019 Naar de uitgave

Responses to “Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift” by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Appraisal as a unifying theory of response shift: continuing the conversation