Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-12-2011 | Review | Uitgave 1/2011 Open Access

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2011

Lower limb biomechanics during running in individuals with achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research > Uitgave 1/2011
Auteurs:
Shannon E Munteanu, Christian J Barton
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1757-1146-4-15) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

SEM is a Deputy Editor of Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. It is journal policy that editors are removed from the peer review and editorial decision making processes for papers they have co-authored.

Authors' contributions

SEM conceived the idea and obtained funding for the study. SEM and CJB equally designed the study, acquired the data, performed the analysis and interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Abnormal lower limb biomechanics is speculated to be a risk factor for Achilles tendinopathy. This study systematically reviewed the existing literature to identify, critique and summarise lower limb biomechanical factors associated with Achilles tendinopathy.

Methods

We searched electronic bibliographic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Current contents, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus) in November 2010. All prospective cohort and case-control studies that evaluated biomechanical factors (temporospatial parameters, lower limb kinematics, dynamic plantar pressures, kinetics [ground reaction forces and joint moments] and muscle activity) associated with mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy were included. Quality of included studies was evaluated using the Quality Index. The magnitude of differences (effect sizes) between cases and controls was calculated using Cohen's d (with 95% CIs).

Results

Nine studies were identified; two were prospective and the remaining seven case-control study designs. The quality of 9 identified studies was varied, with Quality Index scores ranging from 4 to 15 out of 17. All studies analysed running biomechanics. Cases displayed increased eversion range of motion of the rearfoot (d = 0.92 and 0.67 in two studies), reduced maximum lower leg abduction (d = -1.16), reduced ankle joint dorsiflexion velocity (d = -0.62) and reduced knee flexion during gait (d = -0.90). Cases also demonstrated a number of differences in dynamic plantar pressures (primarily the distribution of the centre of force), ground reaction forces (large effects for timing variables) and also showed reduced peak tibial external rotation moment (d = -1.29). Cases also displayed differences in the timing and amplitude of a number of lower limb muscles but many differences were equivocal.

Conclusions

There are differences in lower limb biomechanics between those with and without Achilles tendinopathy that may have implications for the prevention and management of the condition. However, the findings need to be interpreted with caution due to the limited quality of a number of the included studies. Future well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Additional file 1: Search strategy and results from each included database. Search strategy and results from each included database (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus). (DOC 66 KB)
13047_2010_342_MOESM1_ESM.DOC
Additional file 2: Checklist for study inclusion and exclusion. Checklist for inclusion and exclusion of studies. (DOC 42 KB)
13047_2010_342_MOESM2_ESM.DOC
Authors’ original file for figure 1
13047_2010_342_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 2
13047_2010_342_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 3
13047_2010_342_MOESM5_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 4
13047_2010_342_MOESM6_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 5
13047_2010_342_MOESM7_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 6
13047_2010_342_MOESM8_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 7
13047_2010_342_MOESM9_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 8
13047_2010_342_MOESM10_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 9
13047_2010_342_MOESM11_ESM.jpeg
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2011

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2011 Naar de uitgave