Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the 22-item Social Participation Questionnaire (SPQ).
The SPQ was administered to 789 adult primary care patients with depressive symptoms. As the items were intended to be summed together to provide total score, Rasch analysis (partial credit model) was applied to assess the overall fit of the model, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), targeting of persons, response dependency, unidimensionality and person separation.
To improve the scale’s fit, it was necessary to re-score the response format. Two items demonstrated some DIF for gender and eight items showed DIF for age. To support the assumption of unidimensionality post hoc principal component analysis was performed. The analysis showed two subtests of the residuals with positive and negative loadings, but the person estimates derived from these two subtests were not statistically different to that derived from all items taken together. The response dependence between two items was identified; however, the magnitude of difficulty was very small. Although the questionnaire appeared to have insufficient items to assess the full spectrum of informal social contact, the SPQ was reasonably well targeted.
The SPQ is a promising questionnaire for the measurement of social participation although it could benefit from the inclusion of further items to measure informal social contact. This study found support for the internal validity, internal consistency reliability, and unidimensionality. A future study will investigate whether targeting can be improved when additional items are included.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2004). Measuring Social capital. An Australian Framework and indicator, Cat. No. 1378.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of statistics.
Gunn, J. M., Gilchrist, G. P., Chondros, P., Ramp, M., Hegarty, K. L., Blashki, G. A., et al. (2008). Who is identified when screening for depression is undertaken in general practice? Baseline findings from the diagnosis, management and outcomes of depression in primary care (diamond) longitudinal study. The Medical Journal of Australia, 188, S119–S125. PubMed
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. CrossRef
Thomas, J. L., Jones, G. N., Scarinci, I. C., Mehan, D. J., & Brantley, P. J. (2001). The utility of the CES-D as a depression screening measure among low-income women attending primary care clinics. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 31(1), 25–40. CrossRef
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Andrich, D., Sheridan, B. E., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030: Rasch multidimensional models for measurement. Perth, WA: RUMM Laboratory.
Andrich, D. (2010). Understanding the response structure and process in the polytomous Rasch model. In M. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models: Developments and applications, Chapter 6. New York: Routlege. Taylor & Francis.
Andrich, D. (2010). Educational measurement: Rasch models. In E. Baker, P. Peterson, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573. CrossRef
Andrich, D. (2006). Item discrimination and Rasch-Andrich thresholds revisited. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20, 1055–1057.
Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Wilson, M. (2012). The Rasch rating model and the disordered threshold controversy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 547–573. CrossRef
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal, 310, p170. CrossRef
Broderson, J., Meads, D., Kreiner, S., Thorsen, H., Doward, L., & McKenna, S. (2007). Methodological aspects of differential item functioning in the Rasch model. Journal of Medical Economics, 10, 309–324. CrossRef
Andrich, D. A., & Hagquist, K. (2011). Real and artificial differential item functioning. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 37(9), 387–416.
Smith, E. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205–231. PubMed
Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2006). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 1–18. CrossRef
Andrich, D., & Kreiner, S. (2009). Quantifying response dependence between two dichotomous items using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 181–192. CrossRef
- Evaluation of the Social Participation Questionnaire in adult patients with depressive symptoms using Rasch analysis
Jane M. Gunn
- Springer Netherlands