Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2024 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

4. Concept and use of Virtual Reality simulators and serious gaming

Auteurs : Golsa Shafa, BSc, Dr. Amin Madani, MD, PhD

Gepubliceerd in: The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Virtual reality simulators have been incorporated into surgical education to provide opportunities for deliberate practice. A broad range of immersive experiences with virtual reality stimulators are commercially available that range from low fidelity devices to high fidelity systems equipped with haptic feedback. Studies have demonstrated the validity of these devices and their ability to shorten learning curves. Concurrent with simulators, serious gaming has become increasingly popular in medical education. These artificial intelligence driven technologies provide a safe learning environment with the additional advantages of standardization and automated feedback. Current applications include the development of basic and complex surgical skills, warm-up and training prior to complex surgeries, assessment of skill, and preoperative or intraoperative planning. Factors like cost, system design, and learning objectives should be considered when considering virtual reality simulation in surgical education.
vorige hoofdstuk The resident training curriculum
volgende hoofdstuk Laparoscopy training from global surgery perspective
Literatuur
1.
Berrondo C, Canalichio KL, Lendvay TS. Education and simulation in minimally invasive surgery. In: Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 419–436.
2.
Papanikolaou IG, Haidopoulos D, Paschopoulos M, Chatzipapas I, Loutradis D, Vlahos NF. Changing the way we train surgeons in the 21th century: a narrative comparative review focused on box trainers and virtual reality simulators. Euro J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;235:13–8.CrossRef
3.
Lungu AJ, Swinkels W, Claesen L, Tu P, Egger J, Chen X. A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18(1):47–62.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Papanikolaou IG, Haidopoulos D, Paschopoulos M, Chatzipapas I, Loutradis D, Vlahos NF. Changing the way we train surgeons in the 21th century: a narrative comparative review focused on box trainers and virtual reality simulators. Euro J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;235:13–8.CrossRef
5.
Bergeron B. Developing serious games. Hingham, Massachusetts: Charles River Media. Inc.; 2006.
6.
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SA, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ. 2001;327:1032–7.CrossRef
7.
Satava RM. Historical review of surgical simulation – a personal perspective. World J Surg. 2008;32(2):141–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, et al. An interactive graphics based model of the lower extremity to study orthopedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990;37:757–67.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Beyer-Berjot L, Aggarwal R. Toward technology-supported surgical training: the potential of virtual simulators in laparoscopic surgery. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(4):221–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Dargar S, Kennedy R, Lai W, Arikatla V, De S. Towards immersive virtual reality (iVR): a route to surgical expertise. J Computation Surg. 2015;2(1):1–26.
11.
12.
Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, McManus IC, Darzi A. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST-VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:124–30.PubMed
13.
Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268:70–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Rangarajan K, Davis H, Pucher PH. Systematic review of virtual haptics in surgical simulation: a valid educational tool? J Surg Educ. 2020;77(2):337–47.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Frederiksen JG, Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Svendsen MBS, Nobel-Jørgensen M, Bjerrum F, Andersen SAW. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1244–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Jin C, Dai L, Wang T. The application of virtual reality in the training of laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2021;87: 105859.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Mylonas GP, Darzi A, Zhong Yang G. Gaze-contingent control for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;11(5):256–66.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Mohamadipanah H, Perrone KH, Nathwani J, Parthiban C, Peterson K, Wise B, Pugh C. Screening surgical residents’ laparoscopic skills using virtual reality tasks: who needs more time in the sim lab? Surgery. 2019;166(2):218–22.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Våpenstad C, Buzink SN. Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):364–77.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Han JJ, Brooks AD. How can we be more “deliberate” in training surgeons? Am J Surg. 2017;216(2):359–60.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mohamadipanah H, Perrone KH, Nathwani J, Parthiban C, Peterson K, Wise B, Pugh C. Screening surgical residents’ laparoscopic skills using virtual reality tasks: who needs more time in the sim lab? Surgery. 2019;166(2):218–22.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Greta B. Surgical simulation: the value of individualization. University of Washington Medical Center; 2016.
23.
Impact of laparoscopy simulator training on the technical skills of future surgeons in the operating room: a prospective study; Laura Beyer, Jérémie De Troyer, Julien Mancini, Franck Bladou, Stéphane V. Berdah, Gilles Karsenty, 2011.
24.
Nemani A, Ahn W, Cooper C, Schwaitzberg S, De S. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1265–72.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Bernier GV, Sanchez JE. Surgical simulation: the value of individualization. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3191–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
29.
Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, Kowalewski T, Jonnadula S, Mercer LD, et al. Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(6):1181–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Bhakhri K, Harrison-Phipps K, Harling L, Routledge T. Should robotic surgery simulation be introduced in the core surgical training curriculum? Front Surg. 2021;8:42.CrossRef
31.
Harrington CM, Chaitanya V, Dicker P, Traynor O, Kavanagh DO. Playing to your skills: a randomised controlled trial evaluating a dedicated video game for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3813–21.CrossRefPubMed
32.
IJgosse W, Van Goor H, Rosman C, Luursema JM. Construct validity of a serious game for laparoscopic skills training: validation study. JMIR Serious Games. 2020;8(2):e17222.
33.
IJgosse WM, Van Goor H, Luursema JM. Saving robots improves laparoscopic performance: transfer of skills from a serious game to a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(7):3192–9.
34.
IJgosse WM, Van Goor H, Rosman C, Luursema JM. The fun factor: does serious gaming affect the volume of voluntary laparoscopic skills training? World J Surg. 2021;45(1):66–71.
35.
Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol. 2011;185(4):1191–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P. Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2812–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Augestad KM, Chomutare T, Bellika JG, Budrionis A, Lindsetmo RO, Delaney CP. Clinical and educational benefits of surgical telementoring. In: Patel H, Joseph JV, editors. HRH Patel and Joseph JV. Simulation training in laparoscopy and robotic surgery. London: Springer; 2012. pp. 75–89.
38.
39.
Våpenstad C, Buzink SN. Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):364–77.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Bellman R. An introduction to artificial intelligence: can computers think? Thomson Course Technology; 1978.
41.
Winkler-Schwartz A, Yilmaz R, Mirchi N, Bissonnette V, Ledwos N, Siyar S, Del Maestro R. Machine learning identification of surgical and operative factors associated with surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e198363–e198363.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Mirchi N, Bissonnette V, Yilmaz R, Ledwos N, Winkler-Schwartz A, Del Maestro RF. The virtual operative assistant: an explainable artificial intelligence tool for simulation-based training in surgery and medicine. PLoS One. 2020;15(2): e0229596.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Aoki T, Koizumi T, Mansour DA, Fujimori A, Kusano T, Matsuda K, Murakami M. Virtual reality with three-dimensional image guidance of individual patients’ vessel anatomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405(3):381–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Aoki T, Murakami M, Fujimori A, Koizumi T, Enami Y, Kusano T, Otsuka K. Routes for virtually guided endoscopic liver resection of subdiaphragmatic liver tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401(2):263–73.CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, Hashimoto DA, Rivera AM, Pucher PH, … Alseidi A. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2022.
47.
Hashimoto DA, et al. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270:414–21.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Situating Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Focus on Disease Severity. James R Korndorffer Jr, Mary T Hawn, David A Spain, Lisa M Knowlton, Dan E Azagury, Aussama K Nassar, James N Lau, Katherine D Arnow, Amber W Trickey, Carla M Pugh, 2020, Sept 1.
49.
50.
Winkler-Schwartz A, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education: best practices using machine learning to assess surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:1681–90.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Budrionis, et al. An evaluation framework for defining the contributions of telestration in surgical telementoring. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(2):e14.1.
52.
Jarc, et al. Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:103–9.
53.
Jarc, et al. (2016) Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study. World J Urol. 2017;35:957–65.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Broeders IAMJ, Kalisingh SS. Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2009.
Metagegevens
Titel
Concept and use of Virtual Reality simulators and serious gaming
Auteurs
Golsa Shafa, BSc
Dr. Amin Madani, MD, PhD
Copyright
2024
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
The Technical Principles of Endoscopic Surgery

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2904-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2905-2

Copyright: 2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2905-2_4