skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300377acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing the Accuracy of Point & Teleport Locomotion with Orientation Indication for Virtual Reality using Curved Trajectories

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Room-scale Virtual Reality (VR) systems have arrived in users' homes where tracked environments are set up in limited physical spaces. As most Virtual Environments (VEs) are larger than the tracked physical space, locomotion techniques are used to navigate in VEs. Currently, in recent VR games, point & teleport is the most popular locomotion technique. However, it only allows users to select the position of the teleportation and not the orientation that the user is facing after the teleport. This results in users having to manually correct their orientation after teleporting and possibly getting entangled by the cable of the headset. In this paper, we introduce and evaluate three different point & teleport techniques that enable users to specify the target orientation while teleporting. The results show that, although the three teleportation techniques with orientation indication increase the average teleportation time, they lead to a decreased need for correcting the orientation after teleportation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper147.mp4

mp4

76.2 MB

paper147p.mp4

mp4

4.2 MB

References

  1. Jonas Auda, Max Pascher, and Stefan Schneegass. 2019. Around the (Virtual) World: Infinite Walking in Virtual Reality Using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Haptic retargeting: Dynamic repurposing of passive haptics for enhanced virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1968--1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Niels H Bakker, Peter O Passenier, and Peter J Werkhoven. 2003. Effects of head-slaved navigation and the use of teleports on spatial orientation in virtual environments. Human factors 45, 1 (2003), 160--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Laurenz Berger and Katrin Wolf. 2018. WIM: Fast Locomotion in Virtual Reality with Spatial Orientation Gain & without Motion Sickness. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jiwan Bhandari, Paul MacNeilage, and Eelke Folmer. 2018. Teleportation without Spatial Disorientation Using Optical Flow Cues. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2018 (GI 2018). Canadian HumanComputer Communications Society / Société canadienne du dialogue humain-machine, 162 -- 167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank Biocca, Arthur Tang, Charles Owen, and Fan Xiao. 2006. Attention funnel: omnidirectional 3D cursor for mobile augmented reality platforms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, 1115--1122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Costas Boletsis. 2017. The New Era of Virtual Reality Locomotion: A Systematic Literature Review of Techniques and a Proposed Typology. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1, 4 (2017), 24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Benjamin Bolte, Frank Steinicke, and Gerd Bruder. 2011. The jumper metaphor: an effective navigation technique for immersive display setups. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality International Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Laroussi Bouguila, Florian Evequoz, Michele Courant, and Beat Hirsbrunner. 2004. Walking-pad: a step-in-place locomotion interface for virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfaces. ACM, 77--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Doug A Bowman, David Koller, and Larry F Hodges. 1997. Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1997., IEEE 1997. IEEE, 45--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2016. Point & teleport locomotion technique for virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 205--216. Point & Teleport with Orientation Indication CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Carmine Elvezio, Mengu Sukan, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2017. Travel in large-scale head-worn vr: Pre-oriented teleportation with wims and previews. In 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, 475-- 476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebastian Freitag, Dominik Rausch, and Torsten Kuhlen. 2014. Reorientation in virtual environments using interactive portals. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2014 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 119--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Julian Frommel, Sven Sonntag, and Michael Weber. 2017. Effects of controller-based locomotion on player experience in a virtual reality exploration game. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. ACM, 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASATLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Anuruddha Hettiarachchi and Daniel Wigdor. 2016. Annexing reality: Enabling opportunistic use of everyday objects as tangible proxies in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1957--1967. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. John M Hollerbach. 2002. Locomotion interfaces. Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (2002), 239-- 254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hiroo Iwata. 1999. Walking about virtual environments on an infinite floor. In Virtual Reality, 1999. Proceedings., IEEE. IEEE, 286--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hiroo Iwata, Hiroaki Yano, Hiroyuki Fukushima, and Haruo Noma. 2005. Circulafloor {locomotion interface}. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 1 (2005), 64--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hiroo Iwata, Hiroaki Yano, and Hiroshi Tomioka. 2006. Powered shoes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Emerging technologies. ACM, 28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Beverly K Jaeger and Ronald R Mourant. 2001. Comparison of simulator sickness using static and dynamic walking simulators. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 45. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1896--1900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ji-Sun Kim, Denis Gracanin, Kresimir Matkovic, and Francis Quek. 2008. Finger walking in place (FWIP): A traveling technique in virtual environments. In International Symposium on Smart Graphics. Springer, 58--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Alexandra Kitson, Abraham M Hashemian, Ekaterina R Stepanova, Ernst Kruijff, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2017. Comparing leaning-based motion cueing interfaces for virtual reality locomotion. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 73--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Eike Langbehn, Paul Lubos, Gerd Bruder, and Frank Steinicke. 2017. Bending the curve: Sensitivity to bending of curved paths and application in room-scale vr. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 4 (2017), 1389--1398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32, 1 (2000), 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. James Liu, Hirav Parekh, Majed Al-Zayer, and Eelke Folmer. 2018. Increasing Walking in VR using Redirected Teleportation. In Proceedings of the 31th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '18). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gerard Llorach, Alun Evans, and Josep Blat. 2014. Simulator sickness and presence using HMDs: comparing use of a game controller and a position estimation system. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 137--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Thomas Nescher, Ying-Yin Huang, and Andreas Kunz. 2014. Planning redirection techniques for optimal free walking experience using model predictive control. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2014 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 111--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Niels Christian Nilsson, Tabitha Peck, Gerd Bruder, Eri Hodgson, Stefania Serafin, Mary Whitton, Frank Steinicke, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2018. 15 Years of Research on Redirected Walking in Immersive Virtual Environments. IEEE computer graphics and applications 38, 2 (2018), 44--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Niels C Nilsson, Stefania Serafin, Morten H Laursen, Kasper S Pedersen, Erik Sikstrom, and Rolf Nordahl. 2013. Tapping-in-place: Increasing the naturalness of immersive walking-in-place locomotion through novel gestural input. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sharif Razzaque, Zachariah Kohn, and Mary C Whitton. 2001. Redirected walking. In Proceedings of EUROGRAPHICS, Vol. 9. 105--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Bhuvaneswari Sarupuri, Miriam Luque Chipana, and Robert W Lindeman. 2017. Trigger walking: A low-fatigue travel technique for immersive virtual reality. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 227--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1995. Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2, 3 (1995), 201--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Frank Steinicke, Gerd Bruder, Jason Jerald, Harald Frenz, and Markus Lappe. 2010. Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 16, 1 (2010), 17--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Frank Steinicke, Yon Visell, Jennifer Campos, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2013. Human walking in virtual environments. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Richard Stoakley, Matthew J Conway, and Randy Pausch. 1995. Virtual reality on a WIM: interactive worlds in miniature. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 265--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Evan A Suma, Mahdi Azmandian, Timofey Grechkin, Thai Phan, and Mark Bolas. 2015. Making small spaces feel large: infinite walking in virtual reality. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 Emerging Technologies. ACM, 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Evan A Suma, Zachary Lipps, Samantha Finkelstein, David M Krum, and Mark Bolas. 2012. Impossible spaces: Maximizing natural walking in virtual environments with self-overlapping architecture. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 4 (2012), 555--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. James N Templeman, Patricia S Denbrook, and Linda E Sibert. 1999. Virtual locomotion: Walking in place through virtual environments. Presence 8, 6 (1999), 598--617. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Martin Usoh, Kevin Arthur, Mary C Whitton, Rui Bastos, Anthony Steed, Mel Slater, and Frederick P Brooks Jr. 1999. Walking> walkingin-place> flying, in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 359--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Khrystyna Vasylevska, Hannes Kaufmann, Mark Bolas, and Evan A Suma. 2013. Flexible spaces: Dynamic layout generation for infinite walking in virtual environments. In 3D user interfaces (3DUI), 2013 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 39--42. CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk Funk et al.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Mary C Whitton, Joseph V Cohn, Jeff Feasel, Paul Zimmons, Sharif Razzaque, Sarah J Poulton, Brandi McLeod, and Frederick P Brooks. 2005. Comparing VE locomotion interfaces. In Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE. IEEE, 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Betsy Williams, Gayathri Narasimham, Bjoern Rump, Timothy P McNamara, Thomas H Carr, John Rieser, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2007. Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited. In Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization. ACM, 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Graham Wilson, Mark McGill, Matthew Jamieson, Julie R Williamson, and Stephen A Brewster. 2018. Object Manipulation in Virtual Reality Under Increasing Levels of Translational Gain. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Chadwick A Wingrave, Yonca Haciahmetoglu, and Doug A Bowman. 2006. Overcoming world in miniature limitations by a scaled and scrolling WIM. In 3D User Interfaces, 2006. 3DUI 2006. IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 11--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Mengxin Xu, María Murcia-López, and Anthony Steed. 2017. Object location memory error in virtual and real environments. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2017 IEEE. IEEE, 315--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Zhixin Yan, Robert W Lindeman, and Arindam Dey. 2016. Let your fingers do the walking: A unified approach for efficient short-, medium, and long-distance travel in VR. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2016 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 27--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Run Yu, Wallace S Lages, Mahdi Nabiyouni, Brandon Ray, Navyaram Kondur, Vikram Chandrashekar, and Doug A Bowman. 2017. Bookshelf and Bird: Enabling real walking in large VR spaces. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 116--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the Accuracy of Point & Teleport Locomotion with Orientation Indication for Virtual Reality using Curved Trajectories

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2019
          9077 pages
          ISBN:9781450359702
          DOI:10.1145/3290605

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 May 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format