skip to main content
article
Free Access

Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality

Published:01 September 1995Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article presents an interactive technique for moving through an immersive virtual environment (or “virtual reality”). The technique is suitable for applications where locomotion is restricted to ground level. The technique is derived from the idea that presence in virtual environments may be enhanced the stronger the match between proprioceptive information from human body movements and sensory feedback from the computer-generated displays. The technique is an attempt to simulate body movements associated with walking. The participant “walks in place” to move through the virtual environment across distances greater than the physical limitations imposed by the electromagnetic tracking devices. A neural network is used to analyze the stream of coordinates from the head-mounted display, to determine whether or not the participant is walking on the spot. Whenever it determines the walking behavior, the participant is moved through virtual space in the direction of his or her gaze. We discuss two experimental studies to assess the impact on presence of this method in comparison to the usual hand-pointing method of navigation in virtual reality. The studies suggest that subjective rating of presence is enhanced by the walking method provided that participants associate subjectively with the virtual body provided in the environment. An application of the technique to climbing steps and ladders is also presented.

References

  1. BARFIELD, W. AND WEGHORST, S. 1993. The sense of presence within virtual environments: A conceptual framework. In Human-Computer Interactmn: Software and Hardware Interfaces, vol. B, G. Salvendy and M. Smith, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 699 704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BROOKS, F. P. ET. AL. 1992. Final technical report: Walkthrough Project, Six generations of bufiding walkthroughs. Tech. Rep. Dept. of Computer Scmnce, Univ of North Carohna, Chapel Hill, N.C. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, D. R. 1970. Analys~s of B,nary Data. Menthuen, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ELLIS, S. R. 1991. Nature and origin of virtual environments' A bibliographic essay. Comput Syst. Eng. 2, 4, 321 347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. FAIRCHILD, K. M., LEE, B tI., LOO, d., NG, H., AND 8ERRA, L. 1993. The heaven and earth virtual reahty: Designing applications for novice users In {EEE Vzrtual Reahty Annual Internatmnal Sympos~ura (VRAIS) (Seattle, Wash., Sept. 18 22). IEEE. New York, 47 53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GIBSON, J. J. 1986. The Ecologmal Approach to V~sual Perceptmn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. GIBSON, E. J. AND WALK, R. D. 1960. The wsual cliff. Scz. Am. 202, 64-71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. HEETER, C. 1992. Being there: The subjective experience of presence, telepresence. Presence: Teleoper. V*rtual Env. 1, 2 (Spring), 262 271. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. HELD, R. M. ANn DURLACH, N. I. 1992. Telepresence. Presence: Teleoper. Vzrtual Env. 1 (Winter), 109-112. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. HERTZ, J., KROGH, A., ANn PALMER, R. G. 1991. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. IWATA, H. AND MATS~DA, K. 1992. Haptic walkthrough simulator: Its design and application to studies on cognitive map. In the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Reality and Tele~existence. ICAT 92. 185-192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. KENDALL, M. 1975. Multivariate Analysis. Charles Griffin & Co. Ltd., London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LOOMIS, J. M. 1992. Presence and distal attribution: Phenomenology, determinants, and assessment. In Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display, vol. 3. SPIE, 590-594.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MCCAULEY, M. E. AND SHARKE~, T. J. 1993. Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Env. 1, 3,311-318. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ROBINETT, W. AND HOLLOWAY, R. 1992. Implementation of flying, scaling and grabbing in virtual worlds. In the ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (Cambridge Mass.). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. SACKS, O. 1985. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat. Picador, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. SHERIDAN, T. B. 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence, telepresence. Presence: Teleoper. V~rtual Env. I (Winter), 120-126. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. SLATER, M. AND USOH, M. 1994. Body centred interaction in immersive virtual environments. In Artificial Life and Virtual Reahty, N. Magnenat Thalmann and D. Thalmann, Eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 125-148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. SLATER, M., STEED, A., AND USOH, M. 1993. The virtual treadmill: A naturalistic metaphor for navigation in immersive virtual environments. In the 1st Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Reality, M. Goebel, Ed. Eurographics Assoc., 71-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. SLATER, M., USOH, M., AND STEED, A. 1994a. Steps and ladders in virtual reality. In ACM Virtual Reality Science and Technology (VRST), G. Singh and D. Thalmann, Eds. ACM, New York, 45-54. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. SLATER, M., USOH, M., AND STEED, A. 1994b. Depth of presence in immersive virtual environ~ ments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Em,. 3, 2, 130-144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. SLATER, M., USOH, M., AND CHRYSANTHOU, Y. 1995. The influence of dynamic shadows on presence in immersive virtual environments. In the 2nd Eurgraphics Workshop on Virtual Environments (Monte Carlo, Jan. 31-Feb. 1). Eurographics Assoc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. SONG, D. AND NORMAN, M. 1993. Nonlinear interactive motion control techniques for virtual space navigation. In the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS) (Seattle, Wash., Sept. 18-22). IEEE, New York, 111-117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. STEUER, J. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42, 4, 73-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. VAANANEN, K. AND BOHM, K. 1993. Gesture driven interaction as a human factor in virtual environments--an approach with neural networks. In Virtual Reality Systems, R. A. Earnshaw and M. A. Gigante, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 93-106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. WARE, C. A~D OSBORNE, S. 1990. Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments. In Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on f, teractive 3D Graphics. ACM, New York, 175-183. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader