ABSTRACT
Productivity tracking tools often determine productivity based on the time interacting with work-related applications. To deconstruct productivity's diverse and nebulous nature, we investigate how knowledge workers conceptualize personal productivity and delimit productive tasks in both work and non-work contexts. We report a 2-week diary study followed by a semi-structured interview with 24 knowledge workers. Participants captured productive activities and provided the rationale for why the activities were assessed to be productive. They reported a wide range of productive activities beyond typical desk-bound work-ranging from having a personal conversation with dad to getting a haircut. We found six themes that characterize the productivity assessment-work product, time management, worker's state, attitude toward work, impact & benefit, and compound task and identified how participants interleaved multiple facets when assessing their productivity. We discuss how these findings could inform the design of a comprehensive productivity tracking system that covers a wide range of productive activities.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Preview video captions
- David Allen. 2001. Getting Things Done : The Art of Stress-free Productivity. Viking, New York.Google Scholar
- Arnold B. Bakker and Matthijs P. Bal. 2010. Weekly Work Engagement and Performance: A Study Among Starting Teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83, 1 (mar 2010), 189--206.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niall Bolger, Angelina Davis, and Eshkol Rafaeli. 2003. Diary Methods: Capturing Life as It Is Lived. Annual Review of Psychology 54, 1 (2003), 579--616.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jelmer P. Borst, Niels A. Taatgen, and Hedderik van Rijn. 2015. What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2971--2980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arthur P. Brief and Ramon J. Aldag. 1975. Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics: A Constructive Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 2 (1975), 182--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Saeed Abdullah, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Edison Thomaz, Daniel A Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Matthew Kay, Gregory D Abowd, Tanzeem Choudhury, James Fogarty, Bongshin Lee, Mark Matthews, and Julie A Kientz. 2017. Semi-Automated Tracking: A Balanced Approach for Self-Monitoring Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (Jan 2017), 74--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Kay, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. SleepTight: Low-burden, Self-monitoring Technology for Capturing and Reflecting on Sleep Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Russell Clayton, Christopher Thomas, and Jack Smothers. 2015. How to do walking meetings right. Harvard Business Review (2015). https: //hbr.org/2015/08/how-to-do-walking-meetings-rightGoogle Scholar
- Derek Clements-Croome and Yamuna Kaluarachchi. 2000. Assessment and measurement of productivity. In Creating the Productive Work Place. E & FN Spon, Chapter 10, 129--166.Google Scholar
- Codealike. 2018. Codealike: Powerful Metrics for High Performance Developers. (2018). https://codealike.com/Google Scholar
- Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '04). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 175--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laura Dabbish, Gloria Mark, and Víctor M. González. 2011. Why Do I Keep Interrupting Myself?: Environment, Habit and Self-interruption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3127--3130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas H Davenport. 2005. Thinking for A Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers. Notes 18, 4 (2005), 599--603.Google Scholar
- DeskTime. 2018. Automatic Business Time-Tracking Software | DeskTime. (2018). https://desktime.comGoogle Scholar
- Nancy G. Dodd and Daniel C. Ganster. 1996. The Interactive Effects of Variety, Autonomy, and Feedback on Attitudes and Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 17, 4 (jul 1996), 329--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter F. Drucker. 1991. The new productivity challenge. Harvard business review 69, 6 (1991), 69--69. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/10114929Google Scholar
- Peter F Drucker. 1999. Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge. California Management Review 41, 2 (jan 1999), 79--94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Richard Hackman and Greg R. Oldham. 1976. Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16, 2 (1976), 250--279. arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barry P. Haynes. 2007. An evaluation of office productivity measurement. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 9, 3 (jul 2007), 144--155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexis Hiniker, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A Kientz. 2016. MyTime: Designing and Evaluating an Intervention for Smartphone Non-Use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 4746--4757. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kevin Holesh. 2018. Moment -- Automatically track your and your family's daily iPhone and iPad use. (2018). https://inthemoment.io/Google Scholar
- Jing Jin and Laura A. Dabbish. 2009. Self-interruption on the Computer: A Typology of Discretionary Task Interleaving. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1799--1808. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tero Jokela, Jarno Ojala, and Thomas Olsson. 2015. A Diary Study on Combining Multiple Information Devices in Everyday Activities and Tasks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 3903--3912. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Inyeop Kim, Gyuwon Jung, Hayoung Jung, Minsam Ko, and Uichin Lee. 2017. Let&Rsquo;s FOCUS: Mitigating Mobile Phone Use in College Classrooms. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 63 (Sept. 2017), 29 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jaejeung Kim, Chiwoo Cho, and Uichin Lee. 2017. Technology Supported Behavior Restriction for Mitigating Self-Interruptions in Multidevice Environments. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 64 (Sept. 2017), 21 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging Framing Effects to Enhance Personal Productivity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 272--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Bongshin Lee, Eun Kyoung Choe, and Jinwook Seo. 2017. OmniTrack: A Flexible Self-Tracking Approach Leveraging Semi-Automated Tracking. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 67 (Sept. 2017), 28 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minsam Ko, Seungwoo Choi, Koji Yatani, and Uichin Lee. 2016. Lock n' LoL: Group-based Limiting Assistance App to Mitigate Smartphone Distractions in Group Activities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 998--1010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minsam Ko, Kyong-Mee Chung, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, Christian Heizmann, Jinyoung Jeong, Uichin Lee, Daehee Shin, Koji Yatani, and Junehwa Song. 2015. NUGU: A Group-based Intervention App for Improving Self-Regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1235--1245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sai Loo. 2017. Creative Working in the Knowledge Economy. Routledge, London, UK. 178 pages.Google Scholar
- ManicTime. 2018. Time Tracker Management Tracking Software. (2018). https://www.manictime.com/Google Scholar
- Gloria Mark, Mary Czerwinski, and Shamsi T Iqbal. 2018. Effects of Individual Differences in Blocking Workplace Distractions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gloria Mark, Victor M. Gonzalez, and Justin Harris. 2005. No Task Left Behind?: Examining the Nature of Fragmented Work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, and Paul Johns. 2014. Bored Mondays and Focused Afternoons. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '14). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 3025--3034. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Paul Johns, Akane Sano, and Yuliya Lutchyn. 2016. Email Duration, Batching and Selfinterruption. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1717--1728. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andre N. Meyer, Gail C. Murphy, Thomas Zimmermann, and Thomas Fritz. 2017. Retrospecting on Work and Productivity: A Study on SelfMonitoring Software Developers' Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 79 (Dec. 2017), 24 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viktoria Pammer, Stefan Edler, and Hermann Stern. 2012. Visualising the Fragmentation of Knowledge Work. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 779--780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert D Pritchard. 1995. Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case studies. Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Yuri W. Ramírez and David a. Nembhard. 2004. Measuring knowledge worker productivity. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5, 4 (dec 2004), 602--628. arXiv:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10--2012-0068Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert B Reich. 2002. The Future of Success: Working and Living in the New Economy. Vintage, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Wolfgang Reinhardt, Benedikt Schmidt, Peter Sloep, and Hendrik Drachsler. 2011. Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions-Results of Two Empirical Studies. Knowledge and Process Management 18, 3 (jul 2011), 150--174. arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarCross Ref
- RescueTime. 2018. RescueTime: Time management software for staying productive and happy in the modern workplace. (2018). https://www.rescuetime.comGoogle Scholar
- John Rooksby, Parvin Asadzadeh, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2016. Personal Tracking of Screen Time on Digital Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 284--296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anjeli Singh and Sareeka Malhotra. 2013. A Researcher's Guide to Running Diary Studies. In Proceedings of the 11th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction - APCHI '13. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 296--300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Snyder. 1974. Self-monitoring of Expressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30, 4 (1974), 526--537.Google ScholarCross Ref
- April J. Spivack and Beth A. Rubin. 2011. Spaces to Control Creative Output of the Knowledge Worker: A Managerial Paradox?. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (iConference '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 312--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Toon W Taris and Paul J G Schreurs. 2009. Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happyproductive worker hypothesis. Work & Stress 23, 2 (2009), 120--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- TimeDoctor. 2018. Smart Employee Time Tracking Software with Screenshots | Time Doctor. (2018). https://www.timedoctor.comGoogle Scholar
- Veriato. 2018. Veriato | Insider Threat Detection, Employee Monitoring Software. (2018). https://www.veriato.comGoogle Scholar
- Wakatime. 2018. WakaTime -- Open source plugins, goals, and automatic time tracking for programmers. (2018). https://wakatime.com/Google Scholar
- Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Victoria Hollis, and Andrew Guydish. 2016. 'Don't Waste My Time': Use of Time Information Improves Focus. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1729--1738. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas A. Wright, Russell Cropanzano, and Douglas G. Bonett. 2007. The Moderating Role of Employee Positive Well Being on the Relation Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 12, 2 (2007), 93--104. arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dezhi Wu and Marilyn Tremaine. 2004. Knowledge Worker Adoption of Time Management Tools: Satisfaction and Perceived Effectiveness. In AMCIS 2004 Proceedings. AISeL, New York, NY, USA, 433. https: //aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2004/433Google Scholar
- Despoina Xanthopoulou, Arnold B. Bakker, Evangelia Demerouti, and Wilmar B. Schaufeli. 2009. Work Engagement and Financial Returns: A Diary Study on the Role of Job and Personal Resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82, 1 (mar 2009), 183--200.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Understanding Personal Productivity: How Knowledge Workers Define, Evaluate, and Reflect on Their Productivity
Recommendations
Looking for the unusual: how older adults utilize self-tracking techniques for health management
PervasiveHealth '16: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareSelf-tracking applications for health management have become popular both in industry and in academia. Half of older adults in the U.S. track health indicators, but they rarely use technology for that purpose. We conduct a qualitative study to ...
Design Recommendations for Self-Monitoring in the Workplace: Studies in Software Development
One way to improve the productivity of knowledge workers is to increase their self-awareness about productivity at work through self-monitoring. Yet, little is known about expectations of, the experience with, and the impact of self-monitoring in the ...
Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDigital self-tracking technologies offer many potential benefits over self-tracking with paper notebooks. However, they are often too rigid to support people's practical and emotional needs in everyday settings. To inform the design of more flexible ...
Comments