Max T. Curran
Jeremy Raboff Gordon
ABSTRACT
Digitally sharing our experiences engages a process of empathy shaped by available informational cues. Biosensory data is one informative cue, but the relationship to empathy is underexplored. In this study, we investigate this process by showing a video of a "target'' person's visual perspective watching a virtual reality film to sixty "observers''. We vary information available to observers via three experimental conditions: a baseline unmodified video, video with narrative text, or with a graph of electrodermal activity (EDA) of the target. Compared to baseline, narrative text increased empathic accuracy (EA) while EDA had an opposite, negative effect. Qualitatively, observers describe their empathic processes as using their own feelings supplemented with the information presented depending on the interpretability of that information. Both narration and EDA prompted observers to reconsider assumptions about another's experience. Our findings lead to a discussion of digitally-mediated empathy with implications for associated research and product development.
Supplemental Material
- Sun Joo Ahn, Amanda Minh Tran Le, and Jeremy Bailenson. 2013. The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology 16, 1 (2013), 7--38.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alessio Avenanti, Ilaria Minio Paluello, Ilaria Bufalari, and Salvatore M Aglioti. 2006. Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others' pain. Neuroimage 32, 1 (2006), 316--324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130--1132.Google Scholar
- Kirsten Boehner, Rogério DePaula, Paul Dourish, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 4 (2007), 275--291. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nathan Bos, Judy Olson, Darren Gergle, Gary Olson, and Zach Wright. 2002. Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 135--140. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guillaume Chanel and Christian Mühl. 2015. Connecting brains and bodies: applying physiological computing to support social interaction. Interacting with Computers 27, 5 (2015), 534--550.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yawei Cheng, Ching-Po Lin, Chia-Yen Yang, Chao-Chih Wang, Daisy Hung, OJL Tzeng, Jen-Chuen Hsieh, Jean Decety, et al. 2007. The perception of pain in others modulates somatosensory oscillations. In The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) 2007 annual meeting (Chicago, USA: The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM)).Google Scholar
- Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication 64, 2 (2014), 317--332.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C Randall Colvin, Dawne Vogt, and William Ickes. 1997. Why do friends understand each other better than strangers do? (1997).Google Scholar
- Mark H Davis, Laura Conklin, Amy Smith, and Carol Luce. 1996. Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: a merging of self and other. Journal of personality and social psychology 70, 4 (1996), 713.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hillary C Devlin, Jamil Zaki, Desmond C Ong, and June Gruber. 2014. Not as good as you think? Trait positive emotion is associated with increased self-reported empathy but decreased empathic performance. PloS one 9, 10 (2014), e110470.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William W Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 233--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hunter Gehlbach, Geoff Marietta, Aaron M King, Cody Karutz, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Chris Dede. 2015. Many ways to walk a mile in another's moccasins: Type of social perspective taking and its effect on negotiation outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 523--532. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James J Gross and Oliver P John. 1995. Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and individual differences 19, 4 (1995), 555--568.Google Scholar
- Mariam Hassib, Daniel Buschek, Pawel W Wozniak, and Florian Alt. 2017. HeartChat: Heart Rate Augmented Mobile Chat to Support Empathy and Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2239--2251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noura Howell, Laura Devendorf, Rundong Kevin Tian, Tomás Vega Galvez, NanWei Gong, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. Biosignals as Social Cues: Ambiguity and Emotional Interpretation in Social Displays of Skin Conductance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 865--870. Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Ickes, Paul R Gesn, and Tiffany Graham. 2000. Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships 7, 1 (2000), 95--109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William John Ickes. 1997. Empathic accuracy. Guilford Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joris H Janssen, Jeremy N Bailenson, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, and Joyce HDM Westerink. 2010. Intimate heartbeats: Opportunities for affective communication technology. IEEE Trans. Affective Computing 1, 2 (2010), 72--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara H Konrath, Edward H O'Brien, and Courtney Hsing. 2011. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15, 2 (2011), 180--198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael W Kraus, Stéphane Côté, and Dacher Keltner. 2010. Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological science 21, 11 (2010), 1716--1723.Google Scholar
- Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Can Biosignals be Expressive? How Visualizations Affect Impression Formation from Shared Brain Activity. (2017).Google Scholar
- Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Supporting Social Interactions with an Expressive Heart Rate Sharing Application. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iris B Mauss, Robert W Levenson, Loren McCarter, Frank H Wilhelm, and James J Gross. 2005. The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion 5, 2 (2005), 175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hyeryung Christine Min and Tek-Jin Nam. 2014. Biosignal sharing for affective connectedness. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2191--2196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan W Peirce. 2007. PsychoPy - psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods 162, 1--2 (2007), 8--13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Posner, James A Russell, and Bradley S Peterson. 2005. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology 17, 3 (2005), 715--734.Google Scholar
- Tania Singer, Ben Seymour, John O'doherty, Holger Kaube, Raymond J Dolan, and Chris D Frith. 2004. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 5661 (2004), 1157--1162.Google Scholar
- Petr Slovák, Joris Janssen, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2012. Understanding heart rate sharing: towards unpacking physiosocial space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 859--868. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petr Slovák, Paul Tennent, Stuart Reeves, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2014. Exploring skin conductance synchronisation in everyday interactions. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, 511--520. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sophie Trawalter, Kelly M Hoffman, and Adam Waytz. 2012. Racial bias in perceptions of others' pain. PloS one 7, 11 (2012), e48546.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jamil Zaki. 2014. Empathy: a motivated account. Psychological bulletin 140, 6 (2014), 1608.Google Scholar
- Jamil Zaki, Niall Bolger, and Kevin Ochsner. 2009. Unpacking the informational bases of empathic accuracy. Emotion 9, 4 (2009), 478.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Understanding Digitally-Mediated Empathy: An Exploration of Visual, Narrative, and Biosensory Informational Cues
Recommendations
Effects of (in)accurate empathy and situational valence on attitudes towards robots
HRI '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interactionEmpathy has great potential in human-robot interaction. However, the challenging nature of assessing the user's emotional state points to the importance of also understanding the effects of empathic behaviours incongruent with users' affective ...
Does a Character’s Visual Style Affect Audience Empathy and Sympathy?
Human Interface and the Management of Information. Visual Information and Knowledge ManagementAbstractA believable virtual character is able to interact with the audience emotionally. To achieve believability, every component of the character from its movement to appearance must be designed carefully so that the character will elicit emotional ...
Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions
Empathy is apparent in computer-mediated communication (CMC), yet little is known about the situational predictors of empathic responses when interacting digitally. We used a diary methodology to explore: (1) the degree three types of empathy (cognitive,...
Comments