skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675154acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Models and Patterns of Trust

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

As in all collaborative work, trust is a vital ingredient of successful computer supported cooperative work, yet there is little in the way of design principles to help practitioners develop systems that foster trust. To address this gap, we present a set of design patterns, based on our experience designing systems with the explicit intention of increasing trust between stakeholders. We contextualize these patterns by describing our own learning process, from the development, testing and refinement of a trust model, to our realization that the insights we gained along the way were most usefully expressed through design patterns. In addition to a set of patterns for trust, this paper seeks to demonstrate of the value of patterns as a means of communicating the nuances revealed through ethnographic investigation.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C. The Timeless Way of Building, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., and Angel, S. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arvola, M. Interaction design patterns for computers in sociable use. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 25, 2/3 (Feb. 2006), 128--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bannon, L. Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch. Situating workplace studies within the human-computer interaction field.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Borchers, J. O. A pattern approach to interaction design. In Proc. DIS '00, ACM (2000), 369--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cochran, M. The parental empowerment process: Building on family strengths. In Child psychology in action: Linking research and practice, J. Harris, Ed. Croon Helm Publishers, Brookline, MA, 1986, 12--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., and Rodden, T. Pattern-based support for interactive design in domestic settings. In Proc. DIS '02, ACM (2002), 265--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Diggins, T., and Tolmie, P. The "adequate" design of ethnographic outputs for practice: some explorations of the characteristics of design resources. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7, 3-4 (2003), 147--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Erickson, T. Lingua francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages. In Proc. DIS '00, ACM (2000), 357--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Erickson, T., and Kellogg, W. A. Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (Mar. 2000), 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gambetta, D. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. 2000, ch. Can we trust trust?, 213--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J. Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hechter, M., and Kanazawa, S. Group solidarity and social order in japan. Journal of Theoretical Politics 5, 4 (1993), 455--493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Jahnke, I., Kienle, A., Kunau, G., Loser, K.-U., and Menold, N. Concepts for usable patterns of groupware applications. In Proc. GROUP '03, ACM (2003), 349--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hoffman, L. J., Lawson-Jenkins, K., and Blum, J. Trust beyond security: an expanded trust model. Communications of the ACM 49, 7 (2006), 94--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. King, S. F., and Brown, P. Fix my street or else: Using the internet to voice local public service concerns. In Proc. ICEGOV '07, ACM (2007), 72--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Knowles, B., Harding, M., Blair, L., Davies, N., Hannon, J., Rouncefield, M., and Walden, J. Trustworthy by design. In Proc. CSCW '14, ACM (2014), 1060--1071. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lee, M. K., and Turban, E. A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of electronic commerce 6 (2001), 75--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Liang, Z., and Shi, W. PET: A personalized trust model with reputation and risk evaluation for P2P resource sharing. In Proc. HICSS '05, IEEE (2005), 201b--201b. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lord, J., and Hutchison, P. The Process of Empowerment: Implications for Theory and Practice. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 12, 1 (1993), 5--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Martin, D., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I., and Viller, S. Finding patterns in the fieldwork. In Proc. ECSCW '01, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001), 39--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Martin, D., Rouncefield, M., and Sommerville, I. Applying patterns of cooperative interaction to work (re)design: e-government and planning. In Proc. CHI '02, ACM (2002), 235--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 473--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Parker, S. C. State of trust: How to build better relationships between councils and the public. Demos, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Remy, C., Weiss, M., Ziefle, M., and Borchers, J. A pattern language for interactive tabletops in collaborative workspaces. In Proc. EuroPLoP '10, ACM (2010), 9:1--9:48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Waguih, H. A proposed trust model for the semantic web. Enformatika 11 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, Y., and Vassileva, J. Bayesian network-based trust model. In Proc. IEEE/WIC '03, IEEE (2003), 372--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Whitmore, E. Participation, empowerment and welfare. Canadian Review of Social Policy 22 (1988), 51--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Xiong, L., and Liu, L. PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16, 7 (2004), 843--857. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yu, B., and Singh, M. P. A social mechanism of reputation management in electronic communities. In Cooperative Information Agents IV - The Future of Information Agents in Cyberspace. Springer, 2000, 154--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhang, X., and Zhang, Q. Online trust forming mechanism: approaches and an integrated model. In Proc. Electronic Commerce, ACM (2005), 201--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Models and Patterns of Trust

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      1956 pages
      ISBN:9781450329224
      DOI:10.1145/2675133

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 February 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader