skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531699acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Trustworthy by design

Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Driven by changes in working practices and technology trends, organizations are increasingly reliant on mobile workers and the data they capture. However, while significant work has been carried out on increasing the usability of mobile devices and applications, little attention has been paid to the quality of data captured by mobile workers. If this data is inaccurate or untrustworthy, serious consequences can ensue. In this paper we study a system targeted at mobile workers in the highways sector that is deliberately designed to increase the accuracy and trustworthiness of the data collected. The resulting Inspections application has been very positively received by workers and we present lessons that we believe can be applied to other applications of this type.

References

  1. B. T. Adler, K. Chatterjee, L. de Alfaro, M. Faella, I. Pye, and V. Raman. Assigning trust to wikipedia content. In Proc. WikiSym'08, pages 26:1--26:12. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Buneman and W.-C. Tan. Provenance in databases. In Proc. SIGMOD'07, pages 1171--1173. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Capra. Engineering human trust in mobile system collaborations. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 29(6):107--116, Oct. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Cassell and T. Bickmore. External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface. Commun. ACM, 43(12):50--56, Dec. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Cavoukian. Privacy by design: The 7 foundational principles. White paper, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. X. Chen, E. Santos-Neto, and M. Ripeanu. Crowdsourcing for on-street smart parking. In Proc. DIVANet'12, pages 1--8. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C.-F. Chiang and T.-S. Hsieh. The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1):180--190, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Cochran. The parental empowerment process: Building on family strengths. In J. Harris, editor, Child psychology in action: Linking research and practice, pages 12--33. Croon Helm Publishers, Brookline, MA, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Cohen and L. Prusak. In Good Company: How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Engström, B. Wadensten, and E. Häggström. Caregivers' job satisfaction and empowerment before and after an intervention focused on caregiver empowerment. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(1):14--23, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Erickson and W. A. Kellogg. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 7(1):59--83, Mar. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Froehlich, M. Y. Chen, S. Consolvo, B. Harrison, and J. A. Landay. MyExperience: a system for in situ tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones. In Proc. MobiSys'07, pages 57--70. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Gambetta. Can we trust trust. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, pages 213--237, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Garfinkel. A conception of and experiments with "trust" as a condition of concerted stable actions. The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction, pages 381--392, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. Garfinkel. Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social problems, 11(3):225--250, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. Harper, R. Procter, D. Randall, and M. Rouncefield. 'Safety in numbers': calculation and document re-use in knowledge work. In GROUP'01, pages 242--251. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Hartson. Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5):315--338, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. Hinds and C. McGrath. Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. In CSCW'06, pages 343--352. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst., 43(2):618--644, Mar. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. S. Kanhere. Participatory sensing: Crowdsourcing data from mobile smartphones in urban spaces. In Proc. MDM'11, pages 3--6, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Legislation.gov.uk. Flood and water management act 2010. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/ 29/contents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. M. Liu, K. Unsworth, R. Fidel, and H. J. J. Scholl. Fully mobile wirelessly connected technology applications: Organizational communication, social, and information challenges. Proc. ASIS&T, 44(1):1--20, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Lord and P. Hutchison. The Process of Empowerment: Implications for Theory and Practice. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 12(1):5--22, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. C. A. Lynch. When documents deceive: Trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1):12--17, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Marsh and J. Meech. Trust in design. In CHI EA'00, pages 45--46, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. I. Medhi, M. Jain, A. Tewari, M. Bhavsar, M. Matheke-Fischer, and E. Cutrell. Combating rural child malnutrition through inexpensive mobile phones. In Proc. NordiCHI'12, pages 635--644. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. A. Norman. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Patnaik, E. Brunskill, and W. Thies. Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: a study of forms, SMS, and voice. In Proc. ICTD'09, pages 74--84. IEEE Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. N. A. Peterson and M. A. Zimmerman. Beyond the individual: Toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1-2):129--145, September 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. M. Power. The Audit Explosion. Demos, London, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. Power. The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Catalogue, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R. Putnam. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. J. Riegelsberger, M. A. Sasse, and J. D. McCarthy. The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(3):381--422, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. E. Rocco. Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. In CHI'98, pages 496--502. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. E. Rocco, T. Finholt, E. C. Hofer, and J. Herbsleb. Designing as if trust mattered. Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work (CREW) Technical Report, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Y. Schwartzman and T. S. Parikh. Establishing relationships for designing rural information systems. In CHI EA'07, pages 1845--1850. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. E. Seibert, G. Wang, and S. H. Courtright. Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5):981--1003, September 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. A. Sellen, R. Eardley, S. Izadi, and R. Harper. The whereabouts clock: early testing of a situated awareness device. In CHI EA'06, pages 1307--1312. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. B. Shneiderman. Designing trust into online experiences. Commun. ACM, 43(12):57--59, Dec. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. M. Strathern. Audit Cultures. Routledge, London, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. D. Tjondronegoro and T.-S. Chua. Transforming mobile personal life log into autobiographical multimedia echronicles. In Proc. MoMM'12, pages 57--63. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. I. O. Ugboro and K. Obeng. Top management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in TQM organizations: an empirical study. Journal of Quality Management, 5(2):247--272, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. L. Viljanen. Towards an ontology of trust. In Proc. TrustBus'05, pages 175--184, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. D. M. Vyas, C. M. Chisalita, and A. J. Dix. Dynamics of affordances and implications for design. Technical Report TR-CTIT-08--36, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology University of Twente, Enschede, May 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. E. Whitmore. Participation, empowerment and welfare. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 22:51--60, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. X. Zhang and Q. Zhang. Online trust forming mechanism: approaches and an integrated model. In Proc. ICEC'05, pages 201--209. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. M. A. Zimmerman. Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport and E. Seidman, editors, Handbook of Community Psychology, pages 43--63. Plenum, New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Trustworthy by design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
      February 2014
      1600 pages
      ISBN:9781450325400
      DOI:10.1145/2531602

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader